Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 65 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosphere

Quote from: Rosphere on April 18, 2009, 05:39:14 PM
...
I generally have no faith in permanent magnet motors.  This torque of which I speak is most likely mitigated by the sum total of the approach and departure forces to the stator magnet....


Permanent Magnet Motors always seem to have their sticky spots.

Perhaps the aluminum disc and/or the long, overhead, aluminum-stator-mount-beam Mylow uses 'un-mitigate' the approach and departure 'sticky' forces?

Maybe moving the stator magnet to the OD side, (and twist the plate mag's outward; 180 degrees,) will help reduce sticky spot effects?

Maybe adding additional stators will increase any useful power?


This would be fun to play with, secret I the funds and the time.  I would surly appreciate both!  ;)

nyctuber

Quote from: X00013 on April 18, 2009, 08:26:58 PM
TK is one of four people that have taken the time, effort, and money to replicate Mylows claim, and publish his findings. Straight up.

What are his findings with Mylow's setup? I can't cut through the smarmy megalomania.

X00013

The mind F?CK  is to harness linear magnet E, then engineer it rotational E . The event horizon is endless and apparent. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDsWQiG_YTg

B.Lane

You (clearly) see 1;44 into video a electric moter turning the wheel. What a waste of time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYQM8WbCq2Y&feature=channel_page

???  :'(

Bruce_TPU

Quote from: chrisC on April 18, 2009, 04:53:59 PM
Thank you Cat. Apparently TK has confirmed he has replicated myLow's experiment plus a bunch of other improvements according to the replies to the video. I'm excited and hopefully TK can show us what he has done so far.

cheers
chrisC

Hi ChrisC,

Do not be fooled by ANYTHING that TK produces.  He is the same one who hoaxed ALL of us with that self running magnet motor, that Omni, Jdo300 and myself spent all of that time and money replicating.  I figured out long ago he was TK and wrote him a PM and he confirmed his hoax.  Do not trust anything he "replicates" that "works".  It is a lie.

PM LONG AGO from TK in response to me saying he was Al and a hoaxer.
"I think you may have mistaken me for someone else. But in case you haven't, I am really sorry that you lost interest, because there still seems to be active research going on and progress being made. It looks to me like people are learning a lot, I know I certainly am.

When you say "no one got anything to work", that's strange, because I think there are some others who get that silly "AGW" whatever it is, all the time, and it seems to reduce friction and lead to longer rundown times. I'm sorry nobody you know seems to have done this. It's not really that hard, I've done it myself once or twice.

I'm sorry I can't give you any tips, except to have faith in what can be independently proven, and try hard to do the correct control experiments.

(I'm glad you didn't say "wasted time working on...". I don't feel that I am wasting time on Mondrasek's idea, either, even though I know it doesn't stand a chance of working. But if, in a few days, I am the only one who does get one working, well, that would be truly ironic don't you think?

Grin

Cheers all,

Bruce
1.  Lindsay's Stack TPU Posted Picture.  All Wound CCW  Collectors three turns and HORIZONTAL, not vertical.

2.  3 Tube amps, sending three frequency's, each having two signals, one in-phase & one inverted 180 deg, opposing signals in each collector (via control wires). 

3.  Collector is Magnetic Loop Antenna, made of lamp chord wire, wound flat.  Inside loop is antenna, outside loop is for output.  First collector is tuned via tuned tank, to the fundamental.  Second collector is tuned tank to the second harmonic (component).  Third collector is tuned tank to the third harmonic (component)  Frequency is determined by taking the circumference frequency, reducing the size by .88 inches.  Divide this frequency by 1000, and you have your second harmonic.  Divide this by 2 and you have your fundamental.  Multiply that by 3 and you have your third harmonic component.  Tune the collectors to each of these.  Input the fundamental and two modulation frequencies, made to create replicas of the fundamental, second harmonic and the third.

4.  The three frequency's circulating in the collectors, both in phase and inverted, begin to create hundreds of thousands of created frequency's, via intermodulation, that subtract to the fundamental and its harmonics.  This is called "Catalyst".

5.  The three AC PURE sine signals, travel through the amplification stage, Nonlinear, producing the second harmonic and third.  (distortion)

6.  These signals then travel the control coils, are rectified by a full wave bridge, and then sent into the output outer loop as all positive pulsed DC.  This then becomes the output and "collects" the current.

P.S.  The Kicks are harmonic distortion with passive intermodulation.  Can't see it without a spectrum analyzer, normally unless trained to see it on a scope.