Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 68 Guests are viewing this topic.

nyctuber

Quote from: hansvonlieven on April 23, 2009, 12:11:55 AM
The whole idea of energy from the vacuum is idiotic. Logic dictates that if you can pull something from a vacuum it was not a vacuum in the first place.

So much for Bearden.

Hans von Lieven

'Vacuum' is used non-literally..You clearly have never seen the documentary and have no knowledge of Bearden's theory. Watch the movie or stop wasting my time.

nyctuber

I have the videos and will do a backup page if no one else is.

hansvonlieven

Quote from: nyctuber on April 23, 2009, 12:18:27 AM
Yes, the 'vacuum' in the not meant literally. You clearly have never seen the documentary and have no knowledge of Bearden's theory. Watch the movie or stop wasting my time.

I have read his theories. The first thing a scientist should do is to be specific in his definitions. Malleable definitions are a sloppy way to address an issue, they cannot be pinned down to specifics, that's why lawyers like it so much. But that is only part of it. His theories rank about equal with the phlogiston theory that was very popular amongst scientists a while ago.  Not that Bearden's theories can even ascribe to that kind of popularity.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

wattsup

@LightRider

How do we download from youtube? I can download them and put them on my ftp site.

Or if you can make a CD and send it to me, I could upload it to the ftp plus make sub-directories for each build . It's a no frills place to get alot of OU stuff. It is basically an extension of my hard disk. lol I have hard drives on my computer going from C to Q.

@queue

Ya ya ya.

After watching all your videos, I only noticed now why your name is @queue.
I laughed for at least a good 10 minutes. lol
Next time you start a video you should show you putting a little blue chalk on the tip to get your queue ready. lol

Your HS811n has a 13 lb pull and we can notice that your stator is rather far from the rotors if we compare to Mylows first demo with the weak magnets, then he showed the video with the stronger stator placed about the same distance. So there is some correlation. Ya ya.

This tells me that with the same rotor value and the HS170 that is 3 lb pull, the stator will logically have to be placed closer then yours, hence nearer to Mylows first demo.

The wheel mass. If I remember correctly, Mylow once said it weighed about 15 pounds but i think this was like hand weighed and not with a scale. Can anyone confirm this. Once the wheel inertia kicks in to add just a little more speed, that wheel should turn non stop.

nyctuber

Quote from: hansvonlieven on April 23, 2009, 12:26:43 AM
I have read his theories. The first thing a scientist should do is to be specific in his definitions. Malleable definitions are a sloppy way to address an issue, they cannot be pinned down to specifics, that's why lawyers like it so much. But that is only part of it. His theories rank about equal with the phlogiston theory that was very popular amongst scientists a while ago.  Not that Bearden's theories can even ascribe to that kind of popularity.

Hans von Lieven

Thanks for saying nothing. Feel free not to respond to my posts in the future.