Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[Pirate88179]

Clanzer:

I agree!  And I posted a youtube response to the effect that if Mylow had produced this video in the beginning, things would have been much different.  He does need to have Sterling come out there, or, at least, send that motor to Sterling before he takes it apart.  If/when that is done and Sterling confirms this, I will retract every negative thing I have ever posted here.  I am not there yet but, this last step needs to happen or, we are back where we started.

We are all in this together for better or worse, and I would like to see a good conclusion to this saga.

Bill

[chrisC]

Clanzer:

I agree!  And I posted a youtube response to the effect that if Mylow had produced this video in the beginning, things would have been much different.  He does need to have Sterling come out there, or, at least, send that motor to Sterling before he takes it apart.  If/when that is done and Sterling confirms this, I will retract every negative thing I have ever posted here.  I am not there yet but, this last step needs to happen or, we are back where we started.

We are all in this together for better or worse, and I would like to see a good conclusion to this saga.

Bill

Yes indeed. I actually sent TK a PM to see if he will pay Sterlinga to go check it out! After all, he has posted his $1K bet on youTube.

I got to go to bed. It's 1.10 am. Sure was a topsy turvey day!

cheers
chrisC

[nyctuber]

You know me I try to stay open minded on all claims I see and try to replicate most designs I come across, not because I believe every claim I see, but because I want to see proof for myself and the only way in my mind is to try it.

The Mylow Saga, has been one of those claims that has followed a weird path to say the least and I really do hope this last video is real.

What worries me at the moment is that we were shown a couple of days ago in one of Mylows videos was a small battery operated motor and I still do not see why?

Mylow did everything right in the last video, apart from at the end to simply move the Cross bar out the way and lift the Rotor off the bearing mount. If this had happened I would be also shouting from the roof tops and be straight back into the workshop.

As usual staying open minded and all good fun

Cheers

Sean.

The thing in the photo is out of a supermarket scanner or something similar. Not a battery powered device at all as far as I can tell. Somewhat similar to the VCR motor Queue uses for a bearing.

[Digjam]

Are you completely unaware that the rotor is spinning on a bearing assembly? Do you have the slightest clue as to how that differs from trying to move a stationary object on a non-bearing surface?

The stators are mounted on the adjustment device. It flexes. As it is  NOT CONNECTED on it's sides to the stator support bar, do you get why the support bar would have essentially no relevant flex torsion?

Of all the times to be dealing with a silly argument this really isn't one I'd prefer.

It doesn't matter that it has bearings .
Watch the video again.. watch when he stops it,
and then lets it restart. The stator mags move
up and down, but have NO radial flex .. the
assembly has enough freedom to flex sideways
also, but doesn't. If the stator were driving the
rotor, it would also flex sideways as it pushed
OR pulled the rotor.

[nyctuber]

It doesn't matter that it has bearings .
Watch the video again.. watch when he stops it,
and then lets it restart. The stator mags move
up and down, but have NO radial flex .. the
assembly has enough freedom to flex sideways
also, but doesn't. If the stator were driving the
rotor, it would also flex sideways as it pushed
OR pulled the rotor.

That is completely wrong. All of the force vectors are being absorbed and dissipated by the flex of the adjustment device. Please stop wasting my time with this silly argument.