Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[wattsup]

@i_ron

You can't admit that there may be some effects here that you are not familiar with. That even thought we have been putting magnets together for the last 100 years, this particular effect is new, novel and has some rotational properties that we do not fully understand.

When you do tests on something regarding OU, the results of the tests can show both why something does not work or why something does work. The challenge here is to know which of these is being shown.

@RunningBare

Actually I am glad @PMTester and @Sterling have not seen it yet because the next thing that would have happened is you guys dissecting them and tearing down their credibility. Some have already done this to @sterling. You think your talk can just solve things when it is always others that have to pay the price.

I went to see Daniel Pomerleau do his demonstrations. I had and used my DC ammeter while others had their volt meters, etc. We looked and looked and looked for over 2 hours. Came home with nothing but, what the hell is going on here, this guy is real. I had a damn dc motor unconnected in my hand and it was turning. Explain please. Give me the answers. Oh yeh, for sure it's fake. IT HAS TO BE otherwise............. So what did that do for you guys. Wrote a nice report, posted it and that's where it still is. Why. Because nothing will open a closed mind but the closed mind. What you want to learn is why it is fake. I want to learn why it could be real. This is where the payoff is in learning, expanding and re-applying this to other things. If it's fake, keep it fake, forget about it, never think about it again and just lose this potential orientation. Now that's what I call a good plan to Nothingdom. Just what Mr. Big ordered.

[Yucca]

Hmmm, interesting, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBygG9oN9gY.

Great vid RB, i will always remember it. Just a shame the commutator was so noisy otherwise it could have been a very solid proof vid.

It still suprises me how far the flux field reached out to influence the rotor. And part of me can't help thinking that if you filled a spheroid surface space around the transmitter with receiving rotors that maybe, just maybe you'd be getting OU.

Anyway, you've been in this game longer than me, I suspect your truth filters (logical reasoning) are more finely honed than mine. I think you'll agree we both believe OU could be possible, we're just a little dubious about the case in question.

[RunningBare]

I left all the inconsistencies in for a reason.
The distance of the flux field was not really much of a surprise to me since those are neo magnets on the drum and the spinning magnets in the Newman motor were from the deflection coil of an old television, they are quite strong for ferrite magnets.

Great vid RB, i will always remember it. Just a shame the commutator was so noisy otherwise it could have been a very solid proof vid.

It still suprises me how far the flux field reached out to influence the rotor. And part of me can't help thinking that if you filled a spheroid surface space around the transmitter with receiving rotors that maybe, just maybe you'd be getting OU.

Anyway, you've been in this game longer than me, I suspect your truth filters (logical reasoning) are more finely honed than mine. I think you'll agree we both believe OU could be possible, we're just a little dubious about the case in question.

[RunningBare]

You really should get knowledge on the term "closed mind", this forum is full of it, and it does not come from the skeptics, you are a fine example, you refuse to even accept the possibility that Mylow is a fake, why?, that is a closed mind.

[Yucca]

@Yucca

I though I just did give some insight, but I do not have all the answers, mostly questions.

A one rotor segment disk will have rotors on about 15 degrees of the wheel, all in repulsion mode meaning a south fields is repulsively oriented into the disk. You can say this field covers all the disk to some degree but would exponentially decrease as the field gets to the opposite side of the rotor segments. The stator is passing through all these sectors of the wheel, rotor, just out of rotors, 90 degrees to rotors, 180 degrees or opposite the rotors, 270 degrees, re-enter, compression-expansion, and start over.

At the 180 degree point, I would "assume" the field has less energy, hence less drag, hence less resistance to the stator, hence more speed. But coupled all this with the fact that the wheel wobbles, it will be higher when the 180 degrees is under the stator then when the rotors are under the stator, but again here there is the fact that the rotor could be lifted upwards by the stator making for lots of directional forces trying to keep a rotational mode.

Look, I don't really know but I am open to observe and consider whereas measuring, graphing and saying this shows outer forces is totally irresponsible and unscientific to the nth degree.

Wattsup, scientific regime and logical reasoning are what I aspire to... TOTAL OBJECTIVITY. It's an often difficult path to tread, make no mistake! Many of my logical reasonings have led me to conclusions that go against mainstream science and some are even unspeakable in mainstream society.

But the overall sinusoid function of the observed velocity/time graph is so very telling. Plus it has the expected rotor/stator force curve superimposed onto that sinusoid. That rotor/stator curve is one full wave sinusoid in itself as is expected. And that wave gets superimposed on the one revolution sinusouid, It's there to see.

Of course you are entitled to your beliefs my good man, as we all are. I am just saying it how I see it, any rebuttals to this I would like to be explained, I love to learn!