One magnet no bearing Bedini motor

[nievesoliveras]

I have just tried Jesus suggestion with the one wire coil technique.
Unfortunately the source battery still runs down.
I first used one coil, the two in which i attached one to the plus and one to the minus of the battery (with diodes directed like he suggested)
In the end i even used 3 coils.
I am not saying that this might not work at all, just a very first attempt to do it.
Maybe Jesus has a suggestion on what to improve to to this succesfully?

I wonder if the battery has to be conditioned for negative charging for this too work?

My suggestion is to use a capacitor and a diode on one of this two ways to see if we can capture that elusive feedback to the source.
This specific two are for the negative pole.

Jesus

[jonnydavro]

Hi Jesus.Thanks for posting the diagram,that makes everything a lot clearer.I will try too but i have no free time till later in the week.Thanks again.Jonny

[xenomorphlabs]

A little update:
I have managed to charge a 3rd battery from the generator coil.
I did it like John Bedini showed it in EftV Part 7 by connecting one end of the coil
into a bridge rectifier and connected then both the output pins of the rectifier to the 3rd battery.
So thats charging without Lenz effect, placing the coil too close to the main rotor will kill its rotation though, but thats due to the metallic attraction and the magnetic field of the coil itself of course.

[xenomorphlabs]

I have made some long-term test now.
The first test was feeding back to the source via the potential charge method.
After 17 hours the source battery lost 0.07 Volt. (@5mA curent draw)
Then the 2nd test was without feedback
and the loss of 0.07 Volt was already occuring after 8.5 hours.
It is hard to actually measure the effect of this feedback thing, but i think
it shows a tendency.
I believe that charging an operating battery with a potential charge does not work as
good as if the battery would not operate and just sit there.
After all i charged a 3rd battery in no time with the same set-up.
The reason might be that moving ions could be be harder to potentialize for the radiant spikes.
Most feedback efforts with magnetic motors were using current-based hot charges back to the battery. Never heard of anyone successfully doing it with a radiant charge.
John Bedini has always neglected this possibility too. (Maybe just to keep his life in peace who knows)
Anyway thats my findings so far.

[nievesoliveras]

I have made some long-term test now.
The first test was feeding back to the source via the potential charge method.
After 17 hours the source battery lost 0.07 Volt. (@5mA curent draw)
Then the 2nd test was without feedback
and the loss of 0.07 Volt was already occuring after 8.5 hours.
It is hard to actually measure the effect of this feedback thing, but i think
it shows a tendency.
I believe that charging an operating battery with a potential charge does not work as
good as if the battery would not operate and just sit there.
After all i charged a 3rd battery in no time with the same set-up.
The reason might be that moving ions could be be harder to potentialize for the radiant spikes.
Most feedback efforts with magnetic motors were using current-based hot charges back to the battery. Never heard of anyone successfully doing it with a radiant charge.
John Bedini has always neglected this possibility too. (Maybe just to keep his life in peace who knows)
Anyway thats my findings so far.

That was the motivation for the creation of the battery switcher.
When the battery is switched to the position of the charging battery for the duration of the charging spike, it does not block the charge received.

It is very difficult to attain the switching of the batteries with the minimal operational losses.

It can be done though.

Jesus