The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[orionjf]

Dear Kames,
Your answer to question 1 could be right. Only by two different propagation speeds can be explained this phenomenon: something like a group or phase speed and a ?carrier? speed, using a modulated signal reference. In that case it will be very difficult to tune it, I think.
With regard to question 2, I am not sure. Peaks of current means very large peaks in voltage (remember V depends on di/dt). An inductance ?avoid? peaks of current exactly making peaks of voltage. I don?t say that current peaks can?t be done but if done, then the output is a very high and sharp pulse. If current function is a ?ramp?, voltaje will be a constant (DC) but not viceversa, that is all DC components of current don?t create any output voltage. Only with sin or cos function, v and i follow the ?same? shape because derivative or integral function are the same (with phase corrections). In all other cases, I think only an integration (by capacitors, for instance) can provides DC components.
I agree with you that we need to do a complete reverse engineering.
Best regards

[kames]

A little of mathematics:
The mentioned di/dt will never results to zero. The more correct mathematical expression would be lim (di/dt) with time -> zero. When a short impulse enters a coil with no magnetic flux left in it, the di will be a much higher number than dt and can be represented by a function like ?k + x^2?. As a result the function lim (di/dt) with time -> zero will result to infinity because the dt is always linear.

Regards.

[kames]

Hi Orionjf,

Just posted a message but didn't see your reply, That is why I didn't mention your name at the top. My appology.

Regards.

[rensseak]

Hallo Steve Mark,

i hope that you still read here because this weekend my head was smoking an i would like to ask you something.

In one of the videos you demonstrate your device which ist connected to a measuring instrument. When you turn it top down the voltage decrease and you had no explanation for it. Now my question:  did you try your device already on the earth south site?

I was also thinking about the exploding TV and the wire found in the the wall. The position in the TV of this wire is NOSW at the  CR tube and also the small coils inside at your device. These small coils are enclosed of a big coil like the primary  coil of the tesla transformer. May be  the direction of winding the small coils is also important. Starting the first "kick" comes from the magnets and the kick is a result of the initial inertia of the free electrons is in the cable. About the control, sure there are condensators, but i dont know how to build it. It could be so, that the small coils successively counter clockwise be induced, so that there it a rotating magnetic field.

regards
Norbert K??ner

[kames]

It doesn?t let me sleep quietly the thing that is causing so much confusion. When we are talking about DC and AC components at the same time we are talking about a possibility to convert ?quasi? DC to real DC automatically assuming that a capacitor is required.
I am not working any more as an electronic engineer (but still working in IT, I am not that old  -:)), but if anybody here is, correct me if I am wrong. At the time I was working nobody was saying ?quasi? DC, even it is absolutely correct and even a better term. Everybody was saying DC IMPULSES automatically assuming that you can get a real DC component from it if using a capacitor, for example. As simple as is if not stupid. When people were talking about DC and AC components at the same time it was just a spoken language and nothing else. That is how it seats in my brain and I guess probably for other people as well.

However, for Steven?s device:
1)If vortex is involved, it can generate a real DC component
2)If a moving/rotating magnetic impulse can partially looked at as a ?motional field?, it can also generate a real DC component

Sorry for the confusion about DC and AC.

Regards.