The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[EMdevices]

13thHourR,Ã,   Why don't you start a separate thread where people can list links to electronic parts?

I'm trying to discuss theory over here.

Thanks,

EM

P.S.  Never mind, I started a new thread.

[Grumpy]

Your theory is solid enough to build it and see.

[EMdevices]

Thank you Grumpy, I now opened up the tread for discussion.Ã, 

[z_p_e]

It's somewhat quiet in TPU land, so let me pose something:

Many folks have watched SM's video's and made several comments on clues that were picked up. One comment in particular I must question, as I have never believed it to be so.

That is the notion that the open 100W version SM demonstrates is a "4-pole" device.

Carrying this notion further, many have also speculated and touted that the "poles" must be configured and driven as per Tesla's patent in order to create a RMF.

I suppose these are reasonable conclusions given that SM seemed to be quite heavily influenced by Tesla, but are they in error?

I direct your attention back to the first device shown...the small sprocket-capped unit "put together with bailing wire".

Some observatons about both devices (let's call them TPU1 and TPU2):

1) TPU1 has no apparent coils at all. Not saying there are none, just that they are not visible, and surely not segmented into 4 quadrants as TPU2.

2) TPU2 does not have the characteristic yellow toroid used on TPU1 and others.

3) TPU1 must be composed of at least some wire, and this wire is most likely wound around the centre "core" area of the device. We can not see this area well, but where else could the wire be?

4) The "caps" on TPU1 and TPU2 are not evident on any other TPU versions. Do they serve a purpose? I believe in TPU1 no, but in TPU2, obviously, yes (see below for what).

5) TPU2 appears to have 4 bifilar windings in four sections on the bottom ring, which seem to correspond with 4 "coils"(?) that look similar to the coil-core of TPU1.

Reasons I do not believe TPU2 uses 4 poles:

a) Steven always talked about 3 frequencies, not 4, not 2.

b) TPU1 is the bare-bones basic concept model. Looking back from SM's descriptions, logic leads me to believe that TPU1 has only a single collector coil... one of the reasons for its relatively low power output (about 25W). TPU1 therefore uses 3 or 6 or 9 or 12 coil segments around the core, which is comprised of the lone collector coil. Each segment is driven by its own frequency. 4 frequencies fails to come into play.

c) The most logical next step to increasing output power is to bundle several devices together, and TPU2 is the result....

d) TPU2 is composed essentially of 4 TPU1's. The ferrite or iron ring used in TPU2 facilitates the role of the yellow toroid on TPU1 and others. The bifilar windings are equivalent to the windings found on the yellow toroid, one for each "section".

e) The output power of TPU2 is about 100W. Coincidently, about 4X that of TPU1.

Cheers,
Darren

[Grumpy]

Try it.