The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[gn0stik]

@bob.diroto

I see you added one to the mix. I like A or C.. For some other reasons specified in the letter from steven.

The wording of his emails says not "interleaved", which to me sort of eliminates  B. He says there are two collector coils towards the botoom of his message, To me this seems to indicate A or C.

With A or C, either would work in my estimation. They could also be run in parallel, series, two in series, one parallel to those two, etc. I think the arrangement would be the two collector coils in series, and the "kick" coil, parallel to them in the middle.  Collectors being c1, and c3, and the Kick coil being c2. Going back to look at the old vids and pics it seems that on the smaller one, A is used and C may be used on the larger one.

If I had to pick one, I'd pick A.

I need to find some Litz wire. Diroto was right about that all along it seems. All I have is solid, shielded wire of various gauges.

Radio Shack?

[SMC]

Here is an interesting quote from Tesla, look closely, it's exactly what Steven has been saying about what happens when the frequencies and kicks come together:
"...it became apparent that the fireballs resulted form the interaction of two frequencies, a stray
higher frequency wave imposed on  the lower frequency oscillations of the main circuit....
 
This condition acts as a trigger which may cause the total energy of the powerful longer wave
to be discharged in a infinitesimally small interval of time and the proportionately tremendously
great rate of energy movement which cannot confine itself to the metal circuit and is released
into surrounding space with inconceivable violence.
 
It is but a step, from the learning how a high frequency current can explosively discharge a lower
frequency current, to using the principle to design a system in which these explosions can be
produced by intent."   -N. Tesla


By the way, I printed off EVERYTHING Steven EVER said in this thread and spent 2+ hours reading all 15 pages and underlined everything of importance, even the very subtleties. I suggest everyone look over what Steven has said AGAIN.

Tao you read my mind.....I also cut & pasted ALL SM/Mannix comments into a MS Publisher file....but added a few insightful posts from Tao, Tishang, and several others that Mannix said were on the right track. Oh and Mannix- Thanks for the PM- will be a big help!

[SMC]

How about using 3 microcontrollers to generate frequencies amped by MOSFETs and sent into the 3 coils......you could also then use Hall Effect sensors to monitor EM field outputs from each coil as well. You could then set them to automatically scan thousands of combinations and log any magic combos.....

But it is easier to do non-squarewave with the MAX038. If you're looking for a decent schematic check out:
http://www.web-ee.com/Schematics/Function%20Generator/function%20generator.htm

I found some MAX038's here: http://www.futurlec.com/
They have no phone # to double check stock, but the site accepted my order. Get 'em while you can- this chip is very hard to find.

[crusty]

For the European experimenters:
There is a complete MAX038 experimental board kit available at www.elv.de
If you search for kit Part No.: 60-272-60 on that side you will be lead to the kit- description where you also can download the whole article from their magazine inclusive circuit diagram and circuit board.
But unfortunately written in German.
But Easier to understand for me this time.

Best regards,
Christian

[bob.diroto]

Hi all,

Reading some Tesla material and it says the most pronounced affects occured when the mass in the disrupter circuit equalled the mass in the metal object/coil over which the huge 'electrostatic' like, energy flowed around.

Would the mass in the disrupter circuit be the mass of the wire from where the spark occurs but not including the mass of the wire from the pulse source to where the spark occurs ?

Cheers,
Bob