The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[jacob]

Guys a question.  We know there are two frequencys and we know there is a rotating field, these two things are for sure...

Question, is the field rotating in one direction, or is it two counter rotating fields?  If you have counter rotating field of two different frequencys to create a difference frequency, will this signal be rotating and in what direction?  I think its more likely we have two signals like I said in the other post and like marcos image, a new signal is created which grows higher in frequency and rotates in one direction.  If you are to get gyroscopic feeling in the coil, surely one direction is needed.  If you have two gyroscopes on a common shaft and spin one in one direction and one in the other, the force cancels, no?



Regards,

Dave.

Dave,

I think both waves have to go in the same direction. The fact that they're slightly different will produce the desired effect anyway. SM said that he was getting unexpected results when both signals were opposite OR different in phase. Since the frequencies of both signals are probably very close to one another, moving them in opposite direction would create two counter rotating fields. This would invalidate the "garden hose" allegory used by SM. Plus, there is the magnet which, in my opinion, is used to polarize the direction of the rotating flux within the torroid.

But then, I could be wrong...

Regards,

Jacob

[Mr_Video]

well, post the link to the story, I would like to read it,
I have an open mind, and maybe it would change my mind

The whole account of this is in the post you quoted from

Jacob

ok, sorry
I thought you were referring to another story from somewhere else.

I did read the story that was posted here, I'm just saying that lightning shouldn't be ruled out because it didn't behave like the way you or me or the Chicago Fire Dept. would expect lightning to behave, lightning can & does do some very strange things .

that post did mention that a CRT "explosion" can kill people, and it no doubt can,
I have seen the result of a CRT implosion in a TV from the 1950s (before they used implosion protection) & the pieces were thrown out to 20 feet away (big pieces) !

my point is that I don't know how they determined if the whole TV EXploded or IMploded .

[giantkiller]

I am still on a high from Marco's 'kicker' post yesterday...

Lets go on a parallel tangent here of reality to possibilties:

First: The 90 angle coil allows the  lines of flux to crisscross through the other field's harmonic kick lines.
This greatly increases the interference by a level of magnitude, eq. more power. Very much like Moire pattern when looking through two screens held together and shifting each one, ie. changing frequencies. So the two parallel coils counter rotating create a squeezed harmonic between them and the colletor simply pushes a field through the 'KICK' freq. thereby extracting the power. As we have called it an antenna... No?

Second: With the 2 counterrotating base fields, the 2 freqs have to be such the the phase shifts goes clockwise looking down on the device. Why? Some could call this a stretch but here goes. Show me any spinning UFO that you have ever seen that counterclockwise rotated. In my recollection I have seen posts that talk about the difference in power when going clockwise or clockwise? This could be utterly foolish, but avenues have to be thought out.

Third:  I did watch the Freak wave video and the SM devices are Freak wave creators, the kicks. The study of harmonic frequecies show that the output wave can be larger than the sum of all its components, frequency wise. We have examples of this in earth quakes and tsunamis. The SM device is a small waves to freak wave generator then collecting.

Fourth: The hutchison effect comes from the freak wave anomaly directed at an object, focused or otherwise. It is in the videos of his experiments. A Tesla coil and an injected freq. into that field. With better control than just waving 2 freqs at each other, a continuous repeatablility can be gained. I'll bet that by where the field focus is on the target object results in better control. For instance closer to the target objects center results in leviatation with the right amount of power. Where with some other combination of harmonic focus and power the target object exhibits changes and in its atomic properties. In his videos, things made of different non metallic compounds like wood, ice cream levitate, whereas metallic things seem to have the most pronounced effect.

Fifth: And most important! Postpage 1 = 2006-01-30 , postpage 148 = 2006-09-04 = 148 pages in 7 mos. This is 1 1/2 pages a day.
Well, postpage 149 2006-09-4 to postpage 264 2006-09-30 = 116 pages in 30 days. This equals 4 1/2 pages a day.
Now isn't that impressive. Our speed is tripled! Are we our own freak wave?

Next time...  

[HMM]

maby he is using conditioned magnets as oscillators

Floyd Sweet's VTA or SQM "The Space Quantum Modulator".

http://www.hyiq.org/Library/Floyd_Sweet.html

Mike

[Dingus Mungus]

The middle waveform seems pretty regular. Can you figure out its frequency?


@Dingus:

If anyone wants me to generate a custom set of frequencies PLEASE REQUEST!

I wonder: what happens if you replicate this experiment in your program?

Well something lost in this example is square wave format, the example is sine.

I have replicated it in a square format and do not observe the growing feedback in the wafeform.
(but I do think hes on to something)

I must go now but when I return tonight I WILL investigate further.

(What program are you using to simulate this waveform???)

I have been trying to simulate this (reverb) stacking effect shown in your simulations for two days now, and have missed the last 25+ pages of posts. My results have been inconclusive so far, so I would still like to know the name of the application you used to plot this waveform...

Were all frequencies pure sine (+/-) or was one absoulte sine (0/+)?
Can you explain the exact proccess you used to simulate this waveform?
Can you PLEASE tell me the name of this app?