Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Started by Mannix, January 30, 2006, 06:18:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

jacob

Quote from: supersam on October 01, 2006, 12:59:05 AM
jacob,
where in the hell did you come up with that?  what in the hell did you think that made it pertinant?

sam

Sam,

First of all, this technology originates from heaven not hell, just as anything else that is good on this planet. And questionning the pertinence of it is not understandable to me. This is just common sense! We know that tv sets contain a component that in the past created incidents based on the fact that it behaved like an uncontrolled TPU. And anyone who is remotely familiar with television technology knows that the deflection yoke must have been that component. I didn't come up with these facts: they are history. Now based on those facts, I simply explained how a deflection yoke would rotate a magnetic field. That's it! So this is very pertinent. Where is the problem with that?

Regards,

Jacob

jacob

Quote from: giantkiller on October 01, 2006, 01:43:33 AM
... Thanks for documenting one possible configuration for me. ..

You're welcome. Glad if it helps.

Regards,

Jacob

supersam

JACO0B,

THANKS FOR CLARIFYING, AND SORRY IF I CAME ACROSS AS THE DEVIL I JUST DIDN'T GET IT. :o  YOU DO BRING SOME PERTINENCE TO ALL OF THIS I JUST DIDN'T SEE IT AT THE TIME. THAT IS WHY I WENT TO BED.

LOL SAM

jacob

Quote from: gn0stik on October 01, 2006, 01:57:53 AM
He's actually got a pretty decent Idea for rotating the fields.
Thanks, Rich, but it's not my idea. It's just an obvious observation.

Quote
How much of what you post is pertinent?

This is for you to decide. As of now, everything that I have posted is very straighforward and as Tao would say: "100% in line with what SM has said'.  :D  I only made of few points, namely:

1. This things operates with naturally occurring waveforms. We're not talking about noise or irregular signals. Therefore, this energy wave must be sinusoidal.

2. It has to self start. Therefore, there is no room here for circuitry that would produce elaborate waveforms, spark gaps or anything of that nature. The only know circuit that can achieve that is a resonant LC circuit. If you know of any other way, please bring it forward as it will undoubtedly be very useful in the context of this thread.

3. It operates very much like a television deflection yoke. And if you feed two different frequencies into 2 LC circuits made in a similar manner as a deflection yoke, you get a rotating field plus you combine 2 different signals into a transformer like device that, according to SM, will produce the result we are looking for.

4. I have also stated that while the kicks can be observed in a circuit when applying a square wave (enabling or interrupting current flow is like a square wave), these kicks are in my OPINION the result of a transfert of energy between the energy wave we're trying to tap into and the conductor as it passes by the frequency associated with the phenomena, a square wave containing a multitude of frequency. Once again this is only a theory on my part. However I think it makes a lot of sense.  

5. I have no idea for now what frequencies should be used. But whatever they are, they have to be consistent with what SM has said, that they are directly related to the diameter of the device.

Quote
Also, just so you know jacob, the magnetic fields tao talked about would NOT be perpendicular to the collector. It would be parallel to it, if the control wiring were perpendicular to the collector as magnetic fields expand off of a wire radially at right angles, which would line them up parallel with an inner coil that is run perpendicular to the wire being excited.

Yes, I realize that. This is why I posted these drawings. But once again, if the field was parallel, it would be entirely enclosed within the torroid and would not serve much of a purpose. Plus, it would be completely inconsistent with how a deflection yoke operates. I am sorry, but the deflection yoke is pivotal here. It has to be. Once again if you have an other theory to bring forward as to why these tv sets imploded, please do so.

Regards,

Jacob

jacob

Hello Marco,

Quote from: -[marco]- on October 01, 2006, 07:31:09 AM
hi :)

so how come you talk like you know 4 sure how it works?

I don 't know all about it. I am just transposing in practical form what SM has said about the rotating field.

Quote
maybe you can post a diagram of the real thing.

Just did. Connect capacitors to the coils shown, make this circuit resonant at the correct frequencies (no idea what they are for now), feed back the output from the collector to these tuned circuits, then add some sort of control circuit to prevent the device from tuning in too precisely, and you're in business.

Quote
im a bit diffrent..... im just TESTING ALL possabillities to see what comes out cause when you know almost nothing you can do two things....
talk about what might happen in the device or go one and build stuff so you can actually see what happens.
that for me is the way to go.
sure there will be much failure but then again i learnd in a week more than ive learnd all those years on scool.

I agree entirely with your philosophy Marco. This is how discoveries are done. Keep it up!

Quote
you seem to have a good idea to the device so build it and bring it on.

I will, Marco. But it's not possible for now because of reasons you could not possibly imagine. In the meantime, I am just trying to contribute as best as I can

Regards,

Jacob