Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

Started by AquariuZ, April 03, 2009, 01:17:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 53 Guests are viewing this topic.

hansvonlieven

Quote from: Omnibus on May 08, 2009, 03:52:42 PM
One would expect that equilibrium behavior would be when axis of rotation coincides with the center of mass.

That is only one way to have equilibrium. However, an equilibrium state is achieved if the centre of mass is anywhere along a vertical line through the pivot. Unstable equilibrium above the pivot, stable equilibrium below.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

Omnibus

Quote from: hansvonlieven on May 08, 2009, 04:05:47 PM
That is only one way to have equilibrium. However, an equilibrium state is achieved if the centre of mass is anywhere along a vertical line through the pivot. Unstable equilibrium above the pivot, stable equilibrium below.

Hans von Lieven

That's true but in this case it isn't -- center of mass is persistantly to the right of the axis of rotation.

Omnibus

The center of mass vs. axis of rotation calculation may be even a simpler way than @mondrasek's method to determine the workability of the studies devices. Like I said, if that center of mass is indeed always to the left of the pivot then the device is a perpetuum mobile beyond any doubt.

As a matter of fact that discrepancy (non-coincidence of center of mass and axis of rotation) is what attracted my attention to this, not so much seeing the wheel turn. We have to determine is that really the case or is some flaw in the way wm2d calculates center of mass.

hansvonlieven

Quote from: Omnibus on May 08, 2009, 04:07:58 PM
That's true but in this case it isn't -- center of mass is persistantly to the right of the axis of rotation.

That cannot be right because if it were you would have perpetual motion.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

Omnibus

Quote from: hansvonlieven on May 08, 2009, 04:24:08 PM
That cannot be right because if it were you would have perpetual motion.

Hans von Lieven

Correct. That's why I still think we do have a perpetuum mobile.

We already have discontinuous production of excess energy definitively confirmed by the magnetic propulsor. Also, that "squeezed-cherry-pit" concept which Veljko Milkovic seems to utilize as well is likely producing discontinuously excess energy. What remains to be seen is how to make that production of excess energy occur continuously and Abeling's may be one solution.