Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[Omnibus]

Here's one site with patents concerning lowering of friction: http://www.freshpatents.com/Solid-anti-friction-devices-materials-therefor-lubricant-or-separant-compositions-for-moving-solid-surfaces-and-miscellaneous-mineral-oil-compositions-dtnewntc508.php

[AquariuZ]

STATEMENT FROM SJACK ABELING:

Beste lezers,

Uit de reakties van vele bezoekers van onze site blijkt dat u zich grote zorgen maakt dat de uitvinding die wij hebben gedaan en alle kennis die inmiddels is vergaard zal verdwijnen door bijvoorbeeld overname, omkoping of machtsmisbruik van de diverse industrieën of landen.

Meer informatie verstrekken?
We krijgen de vraag om meer gedetailleerde informatie te verstrekken, dit als "beveiliging" zodat ook in de meest fantasierijke scenario's de uitvinding behouden blijft. Maar het delen van informatie over een dergelijk revolutionair systeem leidt voor ons uiteindelijk alleen maar tot enorme problemen.

Doelstelling
Wees gerust: niets zal ons er toe kunnen verleiden om het door ons ontwikkelde systeem te laten verdwijnen. We zijn er namelijk van overtuigd dat ons systeem de mogelijkheid heeft om het energie probleem van onze planeet en onze kinderen op verantwoorde wijze op te lossen. Onze doelstelling is daarom duidelijk: uiteindelijk zullen we onze uitvinding inzetten om energie te produceren!

Samenwerking?
We werken er hard aan om binnen drie jaar een commercieel verantwoord systeem of product te produceren. Dat kunnen we niet alleen, maar Mooie Energie zal alléén samenwerken en overeenkomsten aangaan met bedrijven die hetzelfde uitgangspunt hebben!

Sjack Abeling


TRANSLATION:


Newsletter May 27, 2009

Dear readers,

The reactions of many visitors to our site indicates that you are very worried that the invention which we have done and all knowledge that has been collected for example, will disappear over corruption or abuse of the various industries or countries.

We have the demand for more detailed information, as a "security" so that even in the most imaginative scenarios the invention is preserved. But the sharing of information on such a revolutionary system in the end only leads to enormous problems.

Objective
Do not worry: noone will be able to seduce us for the system developed by us to disappear. We are convinced that our system has the possibility of solving the energy problem of our planet and our children in a responsible manner. Our objective is clear: ultimately, we will use our invention to produce energy!

Cooperation?
We work hard to within three years make a commercialy sound system and product to produce.  We cannot do that alone but Mooie energie will only cooperate and enter into agreements with companies that have the same vision!

Sjack Abeling


It looks like our little "campaign" brought a reaction. Still not the one we all hoped (disclosure). Thanks all, you know who you are...

And let me be blunt: WHAT IF SOMEONE DECIDES YOU NEED TO HAVE AN ACCIDENT SJACK? Think about it. You can call all of us crazy but you must take into account the numerous deaths of inventors like Stanley Meyer & Jan Sloot in the last 30 years. Even though this is the Netherlands.

AZ

[Cloxxki]

I've only ever considered teflon for my project when sliding friction was a factor, or slapping of a chain. Trains don't roll on teflon wheels for a reason: elasticity and rebound. We want low elasticity and fast rebound here.
I suggest we all look seriously into Dar's conceptual ideas, and of course general building principles which would be easily fabricated and offer low friction.
Dar introduces a revolutionary swing action as well as an extreme weight path. these are bound to offer differences from Abeling's basic presentation, as crafted by @Dusty.
Based on Dar's clear but rough slot shape and weight path, can we estimate to which extent the various energy and potentials are converted through-out the cycle? Where are we possibly getting gains, and where are the (apart from friction) losses?
Let's understand which movement(s) we're trying to use for establishing overunity. Which differences from other attempts are promising?

[Omnibus]

We work hard to within three years make a commercialy sound system and product to produce.

Oh, now it's within three years. Wasn't it to be in May 2009? Here we go again.

[Omnibus]

@Cloxxki,

It isn't at all clear what that revolutionary proposal is. It should be quantified somewhat and not just be expressed as a murky idea.