Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

Started by AquariuZ, April 03, 2009, 01:17:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 53 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

@LarryC,

As was already explained, that additional force could not have come from the centrifugal force (slim slam, static or whatever you wanna call it). In fact, if true that there's such difference, it has nothing to do with the centrifugal force which needs energy to be spent for its appearance rather than energy release. Reading standard sources and sources from net search engines is good but isn't enough. One thing is to read a definition quite another is to actually understand it.

LarryC

Quote from: Omnibus on April 14, 2009, 11:05:47 PM
@LarryC,

As was already explained, that additional force could not have come from the centrifugal force (slim slam, static or whatever you wanna call it). In fact, if true that there's such difference, it has nothing to do with the centrifugal force which needs energy to be spent for its appearance rather than energy release. Reading standard sources and sources from net search engines is good but isn't enough. One thing is to read a definition quite another is to actually understand it.

Let me get this straight. The statements of the main two inventors about CF slam energy should be ignored as it was already explained better by who???

Also, you are saying I don't understand my UNIVERSITY PHYSICS book Sixth edition Fig 5-12 page 98 about centrifugal force. I hope they don't take my degree away based on your flimsy word.

Back to the original question in spite of your obvious missdirection attempts. Can you please give me an answer on my last WM2D question?

Regards, Larry

AquariuZ

Larry may have a point. I just found something which can be replicated in wm2d (hope it is not an error) and may very well be Abelings trick.

Keywords acceleration AND spinning weights which hit a constraint (carrier) at a certain angle of attack generates a "jolt". Model tomorrow, looking promising. I´m off as it is 06:20 and work soon.


Omnibus

@LarryC,

Like I said, wm2d won't prove that energy can be extracted from a centrifugal force, no matter how you prefer to qualify it. Therefore, it's a useless exercise to experiment on that even virtually, using wm2d. Also, the fact that you cite a standard textbook, even if you cite the exact edition and page is no proof that you have actually understood the concept. The fact that you're continuing to ask the centrifugal force to be studied as the source of energy proves that you haven't. The statements of the main two inventors about CF slam energy should also be ignored.

Omnibus

Quote from: AquariuZ on April 15, 2009, 12:21:11 AM
Larry may have a point. I just found something which can be replicated in wm2d (hope it is not an error) and may very well be Abelings trick.

Keywords acceleration AND spinning weights which hit a constraint (carrier) at a certain angle of attack generates a "jolt". Model tomorrow, looking promising. I´m off as it is 06:20 and work soon.



Make no mistake, Larry doesn't have a point.