Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


LTspice IV Computes That Over Unity AC Circuit Works!

Started by D.R.Jackson, April 27, 2009, 12:44:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

D.R.Jackson

The Sonic Resonator Circuit....

  Hello, this is D.R. Jackson and you can call me "Doc" if you want.  I am here with a few Spice simulation circuit diagrams for you to have to Run a simulation of the device I want to introduce you to.  The device demonstrates some principles and views contrieved into the circuit to make it accomplish something unique that in the software analysis some people would think impossible to plot in CAD electrical design and analysis softwares terms.  And that accomplishment is the all desired and sought after thing I know that you folk here at this forum refer to as over unity power output.  And so, the software all of its own without being told one thing about the circuit or its concepts, analyzes and concludes that it works.

  For about three years now we have had our concepts up on the Internet at our technologies group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sfggroup The group was discontinued but it is still up Online and the moderator may have it running again.  But if you join it he may get active with it again.

You can download the files at this post which contains a graphic of the circuit as well as the spice circuit files to run.  I have come back today and updated the files for you so that you get all of the files you need to be innovative and understand the device.

http://www.overunity.com:80/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7366.0;attach=33307

  Please copy and keep this post to read offline as you study the files.

About LTspice: If you do not have this software it is distributed for free to engineers and techs, as well as students and hobbyest by Linear Technologies at www.linear.com.  You can Google for it and read up on all of the use and forums devoted to the software.

  I do not want to make this starter post about this matter into a long discussion.  So I will try and keep it all as short as I can and come back and add things as we go along and I can have time to get away to the Internet and update things as we go.  Of course my time is a question and when I can I will get back here, but you will keep busy with these files I am giving you here and so stay busy a good long while.

  However the circuit and its principles are at this moment well developed and are ready for prototyping and actual on the bench study by you and myself.  By the world if you want too also, so I publish in this world forum.  And so, to give the circuit to you in this forum as a virtual model that actually operates in widely used Spice software is like giving the device to you able to operate, though its operation is a simulation.  But nonetheless you will have a model that runs and so, is like seeing, handling, and fealing as well as getting a look at all of its details and not as some sort of black box device that is all sealed up.  And you can calculate and analyze it as well as design another with another transistor model for higher power.  So you will know how its all done once you get to running the model and analyzing it.

  The circuit does not use some mysterious principle but some concepts and views that although newly developed over some past years here, work in the software.  The software is not told what to do with the circuit.  It just sees the circuit layout and then runs test on it and calculates how it operates and so, if it will do anything, the software then simulates what the circuit does from its point of view.  Which happens to agree with my concepts and principles I developed along for conceiving of the circuit.  I was surprise that this widely used software was able to come to the same conclusion of the circuit's operation as I conceived that it might be able to operate under.  And this software will immediately tell you if the circuit does nothing or if its operation breaks down into nothing.  Since in general design use it is pretty good at telling us when a circuit does not do much or nothing at all.

  Description of the operation of the circuit is as follows.  The transistor amplifier section is driven by a 1 kHz singal input power of 1V peak @ 18.3 mA = 18.3 milliwatt input to the base circuit.  Assuming in this circuit a lossless signal source which is provided by a test singal generator in the circuit diagram that runs in the software.  A real source will have certain device losses and a input matching network loss.  The maximum peak positive circuit current to the power supply filter during operation is around 34mA.  The output in this circuit is loaded with a reactance of -Xc = 0.1uF since at the output section the circuit wants to see a reactance.  I have a model that has a reactance in the form of a step down transformer that is rectified into +12V for use to power any 12V device that does not exceed the circuits power.  C3 then represents the reactive output load.  The voltage that the software computes to exist across our output load is +28V peak @ +/- 33mA (66mA peak to peak) the peak to peak power output is 1.815 watts (0.9075 watts peak).

  The power supply filter section according to LTspice IV's computations, sees a peak DC pulse current of 34mA @ 10V which equates to an input power of 0.34 watts (0.38 watts peak to peak).  Since there is a negative cycle pulse of equal amplitude.  And so lets add up the input power that the software demonstrates versus output power.

Input power = 0.036 w p~p (Ib(Q1)) + 0.38 w p~p = 0.416 watts p~p in

Output power = 1.815 watts p~p

Ratio over unity = 4.36298076923077:1

  (In the circuit files you will also find a 48 watt output version of this device you can run in simulation.  So keep in mind that this file is in the collection also.)

  Believe it or not thats the way the software computed it to be to my surprise.  And so, you can run the software analysis and test the circuit yourself ~ all you want; and come out with the same findings.  Its hard to believe that it all works that way and in one of the worlds most widely used engineering and design softwares too.
 
  Ok I won't try to be too long here with any descriptions and so, just allow you to run the circuit in Spice analysis software fashion to study the workings and operation of and let you check the performance your own way in your own time.

  One thing about software simulations where the software calculates the operation and feasiblity of a circuit.  Is that the virtualla parts list cost nothing to research.  Each person who explores these concepts can try out various transistor versions, as well as types such as FET types.  And can even use vacuum tubes as the amplifier section.  You can find a few vacuum tube spice models for use in LTspice by Googling for them, and so add them to you part library in the software's file section.

  Comments regarding this device should be left up to those who will download, run and analyze the circuits.  And so, be left up to expert technical reviews.  I would not say that comments made without first analyzing the circuits can be valid and hence would only be opinion.  We all need to hear from those who are able to evaluate the models and report back their findings and hence here from a jury of like peers.

  I am working now on a complete discussion text of the concepts and principles of the device.  I can not detail them all here since that would require up to 20 pages of text with many graphics.  And so, the best way to learn about the devices is to run it in the analysis software and analyze it and discover for yourself how it operates and see if you can crack the concepts behind it.

  I will keep you all posted from time to time as I can find time to get back here.

  For now let me say that there is nothing critical about operating the circuit.  But you can not alter it much, it has to stay basically as you see it.  The transformer is phased 180 degrees and you can not change that phasing.  Also, in a real model the coefficient of coupling requirement of the transformer is high.  So, the best transformer design I believe that can be used are the new toroid type power supply transformers used in new computer and stereo power supplies that are magnetically efficient.  So thats about it, nothing really magic to it, just these sorts of parts though a really good conventional type of transformer may work well enough.  Which means that in the current state of the art in maunfacturing we have the kinds of parts to manufacture this and so, there is no barrier to manufacturing that I can envision.  Since there is no unusual or yet to be dsigned part.  We have the kinds of part now that we need.  Being the circuit is based upon conventional parts ideas, though the inductance of the transformer is kind of high at 1 Henry per winding.

  And we can hope that some of these fellows or gals here at this forum with their unusual transformers that they have designed, might come up with one that is even more efficient or somehow might provide us with some kind of boost in power.  That would be even better.

  Oh one other thing that you fellow and gals experienced with LTspice software will like to know is that there are no Spice directive instructions written into the spice circuit files to tell the software how to analyze or treat the circuit.  So there are no special theoretical instructions to alter the way the software analyzes and figures out the circuit.  You can open the file up in a note pad or word document and read its net list and see no instructions.  The software basically just analyzes the circuit using its own original instructions and solutions and comes up with its own conclusions.  And so we do not tell it anything about the circuit nor do we tell it what to do with the circuit it just analyzes ot all the same as it would any circuit.

  I do not know if anyone has ever uploaded on the Internet any circuit file that can be run to demonstrate over unity in operation.  If not well we can not say that anymore.  So this I suppose makes it all a different ball game now.  And so, I am pretty sure that you who know how to operate Spice softwares, especially LTspice will be pretty happy with the circuits.

D.R. "Doc" Jackson

Tip! ...if you decrease L2 to 0.5 H then the current through Dx will increase and increase the power output, but not change the power supply input power.
 

D.R.Jackson

To summarize my models, I have a model of that same circuit that I made a tap change on the secondary to increase the current of Dx by 3 times, without changing the power supply current.  So now the output is even higher.  Which is interesting as compared to the first model.  But tthese two strange models are nothing compared to what happens when I place a higher powered transistor (2N3055) into this circuit.

In the 2N3055 model the power supply current at 10V is still 60mA peak to peak.  And so, is the same as the low powered model.

The rectified current through Dx from L2 is 885mA.

The current in C3 is 1.8A peak to peak @ 25.3V (pulsed DC peaks).

If LTspice is only half right about the output of this circuit, I think I would accept that and go with it.

One thing about this circuit is that it appears that I am reaching the limit at which it can draw current through L2 by the power ~ supplied by V1 of 10V or our circuit working volts.  Since any adjustment to the inductance of L2 in terms of taps, does not effect I(L2).  However when you crank up the power supply voltage you can then crank up the current.

When V1 is 24V DC, then V(C3) = 60V and I(C3) = 2.72A p~p

This model is extreme over unity according to the software analysis.

In this model the ratio of onput power from the power supply and the 1 kHz signal input, to the output is way too higher to ignore.  Providing that LTspice is interpreting the circuit correctly.

I was thinking of ways to test these ideas on the test bench knowing that its kind of hard to find a transformer with 1 Henry windings.  So I thought that perhaps an alternative would be something like a 120V to 120V test bench isolation transformer, and one with an adjustable secondary sounds even better.  And since the low powered model allow for changing secondary taps, I thought that maybe some power supply transformers with a secondary for 60V to 70V AC might work.  Which is not impossible to find.

And we have vacuum tube plate transformers for home stereo than you can order.  With certain winding impedances a 1 kHz which tells you something about what the inductance of the windings might be.  So they seem like good choices.  Some ham radio operators in the group might have a junk box of old plate modulation transformers.  And so, might try something.

In conclusion, those of this forum with the interest and the electrical skills as well as some prior knowledge of LTspice and being skilled with its use.  May run the circuits, analyze their workings as well as peculair quirks.  And help to develope a base of information from numerous studies.  The LTspice files then are our quide and helps and the make it possible to investigate the device without having to buy allot of research parts.  And once we have things pretty well defined we can make a few test bench models.  So, I hope you will be inspired to innovate.

vasik041

Hi Doc,

Have you checked power in LTSpice ?

Thanks,
-V.

D.R.Jackson

vasik041

  Glad to see you got LTspice...

  I was looking at the output computed by LTspice and it looks to me to be more of what I would calculate for the RMS power.  Using the manual method.

  If you want to see a great increase of power over input power.  (~See the circuit diagram beneath this here reply) Run the 2N3055 model in the extra models folder.  Also, in that model run the power supply in one simulation at 24 volts and then compute the power.  I hope that will look pretty good to you.  And interest you. (Check out its LTspice watts plot graphic below this reply also!)

  To encourage you and others I have done a similar plot in LTspice such as you have done of the inputs versus output power of the 2N3055 model and have it for you to see below this reply.  I tend to be guilty of adding my voltages and currents up in a visual manner from the waveform plots and so measure things in peak to peak terms.  But from now on I will use your method and let LTspice express its math and science in the matter.

  I will try the spice directive you used in all my models and see how that all computes.

*The standard model is used to show mainly how I can balance the currents in L1 and L2 as well as C3 based on the same current levels.  And so, the power input to output is compeditive in this model.  Its more or less what I intend as a concepts and principles model in my text I am working on.

  In the 2N3055 model you have the same peak to peak current in V1 as in the standard model but I(L2) is up at 885mA (see) and check the input power on the Q1 base which is higher with this transistor.  Then crank up the voltage of V1 as I mentioned to 24V and then compute that.  I think that you will see that the 885mA current in Dx makes this model a different ball game.

  And the equation will change even more when I give you a model of one of these circuits powering another so that the power from the second comes only from the first one and not a power supply.  So ponder that equation too.

  So try the 2N3055 model!

Dan

Thank You and I am glad you are running LTspice! ;D

Dan

D.R.Jackson

"Everything You Need To Know About These Over Unity Spice Simulations"

I will offer you a description of the circuits here in this post that you can download in LTspice circuit simulations files: so that you can decide if you are curious and wish to inquire further into these matters?  And so, I offer up a public description which we will Archive here in this Public Domain forum for the world to ponder and use.  And to document the concepts and principles by the father of the invention himself. ~ 04/28/09

This discussion will use the Standard Model in the above graphic for our discussion, and then we will mention the Virtual Power Supply Concept and then the higher powered model.

The circuit looks allot like a audio amplifier since it is after all a AC circuit.  It is driven by a 1 kHz input signal.  And the unique thing about the device is that it uses the transformer to 180 degree phase the induced current so that a separate branch current for the transistor exist that rectifies and pulls the current through the collector in a branch that is away from the power supply.  In this branch the rectified current through the diode, makes the DC current of the rectified half cycle move in the direction of the diode.  And so, the transistor current sees what appears to be another power supply via the the induced force of L2 and the rectification of the current by the diode at the end of L2.  Since the current through L2 that is rectified by Dx is in the in forward direction.  Which draw this branch current up from the ground, through the emitter and collector on up into L2 and through Dx back to ground to recirculate around again and again.  And have to be circulated around by the power supply.

So this extra induced current does not have to be carried by the power supply.  And the electromotive force for moving this extra current is induced in L2 by L1.  Thanks to our 1 kHz drive on the base input of Q1.

Now the added benefit of the transformer is that in addition to an extra powering current added to the transistor, is that the transformer coil winding induces a transistor collector voltage on the transistor of +27.5V and so, the voltage now is way higher than the +10V power supply voltage.

The transistor (Q1) collector current is now = to I(L1)+I(Dx)+I(C3) so you can see that we can analyze and quantify the currents and voltages and so, are not dealing with some exotic and unquantifiable energy that never can be computed.  All of this is computable.

  The transistor powering current is now doubled by the secondary winding and the voltage is stepped up.  And so, adding in the load current to the collector current I(C3).  The final collector current is now three times what the power supply delivers, and the voltage is nearly 3 times that of the power supply.  The output load C3 now has 1/3rd the transistor current which is equal to the power supply current at +27.5V rather than the +10V of the power supply.

Once you get a look at it all, its easily understood.  And reduces down to simple views.

  In this low powered model I deliberately set the currents of L2 and C3 to match that of the input current from V1 to demonstrate something in another LTspice simulation model.  By tapping L2 at 0.5H we can increase the current of this branch of the circuit through Dx by a little over three times and the current of the power supply I(V1) does not change in the simulation since I have better matched the loading of L2.  And so, when this is done the over unity computation of the circuit is even greater.

  And so the description of its operation is pretty easy to explain and follow, if you will analyze it in LTspice.

The Virtual Power supply Concept:

  Further comments about T1 and its secondary winding L2 are as follows. 

  What the transistor current sees through L2 is a rectified DC current direction up through L2 to Dx.  And so, the conceptual definition of Dx is that the forward moving force of L2 to pull current forwards to Dx and rectify it into DC, makes Dx appear to be a positive power supply terminal with respect to Q1, to attract forward current from the transistor.  And, appears to Q1 to be another power supply branch.  And so, provides for another power supply branch of current; so that this current can be added back into the summed power equation of the transistor currents.

  If we were relying on a single choke coil for L1 and did not have L2.  Then we would have an induced voltage to use on the collector of Q1.  However, L1 radiates electromagnetic energy and so, this radiated energy would not be used for anything.  And would not be efficient in that we are not make the most of the available energy and conserving it.  By adding L2 as a secondary winding to make a transformer out of our choke L1.  We now have a means to capture the radiated electromagnetic energy and use it to do some work for us.  And so, conserve our available energy.  Where L1 alone would merely mean that we are not using all of the energy that the circuit has available.  So T1 is that means to make use of the magnetic energy of L1 which can induce another current into the circuit by L2.

  In summary of the previous view we have to find a way to added that energy back into the circuit in a way that adds up in a positive way.  So we have to phase it for the right moment to conduct in the right direction, and rectify it into DC current that can be used to up the sum of the input power into the transistor.  Though the sum of this input power is induced into the circuit by the transistor itself via the 1 kHz drive input.

  Always remember that the conceptual definition of L2 and its rectifier Dx is that with respect to the collector current I(Q1) this appears to be another positive power supply terminal.  And so, is a virtual power supply built into the circuit that makes use of energy captured from and out of the 1 Henry collector choke L1 ~ that would ordinarily be lost to radiation if L1 were a mere choke and not a transformer.

The High Powered Model

  The high powered model in the above graphic that uses the 2N3055 transistor.  Is unique in that the same power supply current that is drawn by the Standard Model that uses the 2N5550 transistor is the same in this model.  The only difference is that the 1 kHz drive signal power input to this transistor is higher.  The current through Dx in this model is 885mA.  The induced voltage on the collector and across C3 is 25.3V.  the current induced into Ce by both the transistor and the un rectified half cycle of L2 is 1.78A peak to peak.  And so, LTspice calculates that in this model the ratio of over unity is greater than the previous models.  and so, you can do the math here and add up the power output of this later model.

  As mentioned in the previous post here I made.  In this model we are maxing out our force in L1 and L2 with the currents we are running and the different loading that the 2N3055 transistor offers as compared to the lower powered model.  And so, the idea of changing the L2 tap point to anything less than 1 Henry in this model will not work to produce a further current increase in Dx and Q1.  So we are maxed out in this model.

  However to get further power increases all we have to do is increase the power supply voltage to 12 or 24 volts.  Which will give us allot of power output.  However if we move the voltage up to around 50 volts the induced voltages of L1 and L2 etc, will cause the performance of the circuit to break down.  So, we need to keep the power supply voltage within a certain maximum level.  24 volts is fine as a power supply input to this circuit.

  If anyone of you at any time become concerned for the base to emitter current rating of a transistor used in the models.  And find that from the transistor data sheets that the base current is near to or being exceeded.  The thing to do then is to use Motorola RF power transistors in the same power output range as the transistor you modeled, since the RF transistor is made to handle more base to emitter dissipation than other kinds of transistors.  Also, the use of higher powered FET transistors will enable you to reduce the 1 kHz input power since they have gate input impedances and resistance that are high and so similar to vacuum tubes.  Which is a way to reduce the 1 kHz driver power input.

  In closing for now, it appears that from my analysis of both L1 and L2 in terms of current.  We do not need allot of current in either L1 or L2 according to the high powered model.  So long as we have current in L2 comparable to that of L1 or higher, and a little higher seems to be better.  We can have an over unity energy equation in the circuit.  And true all of the impedance calculations and plotting of performance with different transistor types and currents, etc, as well as maybe different input signal frequencies are yet to be studied by who knows how many of us.

  One thing I will tell you not to attempt to do is to make the circuit resonate strictly at 1 kHz.  This circuit generates allot of harmonics naturally.  In fact a FFT analysis reveals it is rich in harmonic energy and this is the way it naturally runs.  If you try to filter all of the byproducts out of the circuit and try to tune it all strictly to 1 kHz.  Then you are not conserving all of the available energy types that this circuit generates.  And so, would only be filtering out the energy that naturally resonates through the circuit in terms of all the various frequency energy that is generated.  So, leave well enough alone.  Do not filter out and hence destroy all of the energy.  After the output signal is stepped down in a step down transformer (as I am doing in a Spice model I have here ~ I will upload when I can) and then the stepped down voltage is rectified.  Then we can slap a power supply filter capacitor on the DC output and then use the voltage and current.

  Further explanations of the performance of these devices are forth coming in the future.  And at the moment would take up a few pages of text and so are better left for compiling into a PDF document that we will upload in the future here in these post for you to use.

  I hope all who run and analyze these circuits will enjoy them and be inspired and will think of ways that we all can work together in the future.  So I give everyone a working model though its a virtual circuit model.  And I hope that all runs well!