Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mylow Motor was a fake

Started by hartiberlin, May 20, 2009, 07:43:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

wattsup

@TK

I am glad the observation of the Potential String (PS) in the Video 6 if entering the left bridge hole would have been directly aligned with the shaft flats came from you and not me since this would have been construed as another reason for an excuse.

So let's do it again. Let's analyze this one to hell and back and see what we get.

1) PS on shaft flats would mean there are two disadvantaged positions per full rotation for the PS to turn the shaft. One when the flat is perpendicular to the bridge hole and two when the flat is horizontal to the bridge hole. No I do not think there is an absolute need to replicate  a PS over the flats. (Gee, did I saaaaaaaaay that?). I do however consider that such a condition would render the potentially for the PS to turn the wheel is a steady fashion to be very hard to accept. Especially if one would then consider that the stator to rotor relationship would have been an additional hindrance from mutual drag being exerted on the outer rim of the wheel meaning any exertion there would be felt in multiples near the shaft.

2) Again when Mylow lifted the stator bridge to show the stator close up, this would have extended the PS. I know you touched upon this as I had mentioned once before. But then again I am not convinced that the movement was that negligible. He lifted the bridge a good 2-3 feet from the rotor as can be seen in the first photo vid6-bridge1.jpg. This would equal a 6 foot extension of the PS being 3 feet one way and 3 feet the other way. Again, the advent of being able to tighten up all the foreseeable slack is not possible in my view and cannot be shown to have taken place during the video.

3) If in the event that he had managed to take up all the PS slack within the 4-5 seconds it took him to put the bridge back in place by 1:17, and this while holding the bridge in his left hand and the camera in his right hand explaining why the camera was erratic since he was concentrating on putting the bridge back in place and not on filming, there is the another inconsistency here. While the bridge was then placed back he made sure it was pushed to the right to keep the stator away from the rotors and to hold the wheel blocked. He was not ready to start the wheel yet and he knew the stator would make the rotors turn if it was not positioned where it was.

4) Now if there was a PS active and turning while he moved the bridge in item 2 on in item 3, the wheel should have been turning all this time and it was not so if there was a PS, it was not turning. If it was not turning, and if Mylow knew his wheel did not work, then why did he push the bride to the right to block the wheel? Either because he was worried it would turn on its own before the camera was ready or because he knew that when he turned on the motor, the PS would start the wheel before he could show some positioning of the stator activity.

5) At 1:28 I have grabbed a photo vid6-bridge2.jpg showing the bridge and the shaft. There is noting there in terms of a PS. not even when close ups are seen.

6) At 1:44 he brings his left hand to the left bridge for the first time to pull it away from the wheel and to bring the stator closer to the rotors. His left hand is on the bridge, his right hand is holding the camera so no chance to pass a string through the hole, lift up the wheel to loop the PS into place. This DID NOT HAPPEN. He just pulled on the bridge and positioned the stator.

7) At 2:22 the stator was at it's closest position to the rotor and we can see the rotors react to the stator. Again left hand on bridge and right hand with camera. Now PS can be manoeuvred as one would expect nor any slack taken up.

8) At 2:30 he moves the wheel so the rotors exit momentum is at the stator alignment and he JUST LET IT GO, no pushing, no nothing. The wheel stated to push through the first 3 set, then the next and by that time the wheel was up and turning AS I WOULD EXPECT IT TOO TURN LOOKING AT MY MANY EXPERIMENTS OF MY OWN WHEEL. Except that Mylwos kept on turning and turning. During this time, his left hand was free but his right hand still had the camera. So, it is impossible for him to keep filming from where he was shown in photo vid6-bridge3.jpg when he zoomed out showing the distance he actually was from the wheel at 3:18 while the wheel was still turning.

9) At 4.54 he stops the wheel by pushing the bridge to the right. This was the only time he came close enough to the wheel once it was started since all the closeups he did was with the camera zoom while he was standing a good few feet away. The way the wheel stopped again is exactly how one would expect it to stop with a magnet to magnet wheel and the built up momentum coming to a stop. No exaggerated dragging against the wheel indicating the wheel wanted to continue turning with the aid of a PS.

10) At 5:09 I grabbed this photo vid6-bridge4.jpg showing under wheel at the left bridge. There is no PS. Not even an inkling of one. I know you saw something but given all these facts of no way being able to have a PS on the wheel before the demo, the proper start up and acceleration, the fact that has was a few feet away from the wheel after start-up all point to only one conclusion in my mind. This is real.

OH, I did not continue to the end for the video since this first start-up is good enough to show if it should be fake or not, but in my book, THIS VIDEO IS REAL.

OK. The ball is in your court. Take it away @TK.

11) Last observation or better still quandary is why would Mylow send High Res videos to Sterling of videos of the bar magnet demos and not the first demos. If he wanted to show they were all fake, why not send all or at least one of each. I am thinking either he wanted Sterling to find the second ones fake or he was pressured to send the faked High Res ones by other forces beyond his control. The only thing that is protecting Mylow right now from any potential outer forces, call them what you will, is the fact that Mylow is now in the public eye. Trying to subvert second demos would have been the only option they had left if they were not able to remove Mylow because of all this attention and actually Sterlings involvement in publicizing all this may have helped Mylow's situation in that regard. So we may have to thank Sterling for building up the Mylow name. Sound not to appealing for some but only time will tell.

wattsup


wattsup


wattsup


Bobbotov

I am sure all of this deconstruction is taking time away from your own replication which would settle the veracity of Mylow far more than this.