Mylow Motor was a fake

[RunningBare]

So the MiB permits Mylow to make an audio confession that implicates them?, this is so funny and tragic, I do not know whether to laugh or cry.
If this is not the last nail in the coffin, then I would like to know what will be.

[maryyugo]

Sterling, I'm really curious-- if the MIB's are so powerful, how come they aren't after hybrid cars, wind turbine generators, geothermal power, flexfuel and ethanol programs such as the one in Brazil, solar power, LENR/cold fusion research, and all the other technologies that avoid using petroleum, and, as opposed to magnetic motors, actually work!? Can you give me a reason why MIB's go after magnetic motors, none of which has EVER been shown to work but they leave all those working technologies.

PS:  My standing offer (and I'm sure Eric's as well) of $10,000 cash on the spot for ANY working purely magnetic motor still stands.  Where are all those working Bedini motors?  All those working other magnetic motors that Bedini and the others claim to know about?  There's no lack of willing and competent testers.  There does seem to be a scarcity of self-running motors!

[TinselKoala]

But, the train Bedini showed was no fake.

Lab test results by CTEC (Bearden's co) from '99.: http://www.filesavr.com/hjlabmemo1a

Note the mention of the addition of extra track, to facilitate testing. As shown in the video Bedini recently posted.

Test results show a net gain, and make no mention of cogging at the end of the gate, as seemed apparent in the the video.

That's odd.

Also no mention of closing the loop and making it run forever on a circular track.
For an example of the test protocols in Bedini's laboratory, please see their recent video of their "mylow replication."
Odd? Not at all, just poor lab procedure and selective data recording. Happens all the time, more often in some labs than others.

[nyctuber]

Also no mention of closing the loop and making it run forever on a circular track.
For an example of the test protocols in Bedini's laboratory, please see their recent video of their "mylow replication."
Odd? Not at all, just poor lab procedure and selective data recording. Happens all the time, more often in some labs than others.

It doesn't appear that closing the loop was part of the CTEC test. I know you know your stuff but I think it's a bit of a leap to say Bearden's test in 99 was poor procedure based on Bedini not being able to reproduce Mylow's (nonworking) magnet motor.

Had you see that report before?

[RunningBare]

Ok, Bedini seems pretty level headed, but mentioning Bearden does not give any credibility to the whole thing IMHO, having read Bearden's history(I will add not in detail), he has shown his judgment cannot be trusted, this is of course is a personal opinion, I would not let him test my replications.

It doesn't appear that closing the loop was part of the CTEC test. I know you know your stuff but I think it's a bit of a leap to say Bearden's test in 99 was poor procedure based on Bedini not being able to reproduce Mylow's (nonworking) magnet motor.

Had you see that report before?