Is Sterling Allan of Peswiki fame truthful honest person?

[RunningBare]

But, if I come up with a working FE device per any anyone's standards, confirmed and available to all, and THEN I admit I killed an alien for the plans, would you believe me?

In all seriousness, I think you'll be doing this communicty good offering your services and online facilities.

Bring the alien body for autopsy(assuming you have not started an intergalactic war), get independent third party validation that the alien is indeed not of this earth and I might allow you the freedom to use the words reptilian overlords with no risk of a ban.

In all seriousness I agree, the tree could do with a little shaking to see what drops out, I very much enjoy replication even if I do not believe it will work, it's an exercise building and creating, but my creative juices gets badly interrupted when the thread I'm getting ideas from suddenly turns to MiB and other odd conspiracies.

I know there are plenty of bad dudes out there with vested interest, but if I was one of them looking at this community I would not feel the least bit threatened, for the simple reason no one has yet proved over unity(with the exception of nuclear energy)

Oh, one other thing, I'd ban people selling kits claiming to be over unity, instead I'd have advertisements that point to legitimate firms for the components needed, Magniworks is a good example of why this is needed.     

[0c]

I had considered the same, unfortunately if I went by say wattsup's rules the site would be deserted, I'd allow all the crazy inventions and discussions about them, but, the first mention of a vision from God, BAN!, the first mention of MiB, BAN!, the first mention of aliens giving them the secret, BAN!

Now with all that in mind and looking around the FE community, I can see my site would be extremely unpopular.

C'mon RB. You could have the MOST popular site on the internet if you go about it right.

Imagine a VR environment which has:

1) A museum of photos and videos of actual devices (working or not)

2) A gallery of drawings and designs

3) A library of documents

4) An asylum for discussing wacko ideas

5) A lab for experimental procedures and results

6) A think tank for rational discussion of fringe topics

7) A school to learn about mainstream ideas

Area 51 for alien technology

9) A mountain for divine enlightenment (Sinai, Olympus, Kailash, etc.)

10) A soapbox for budding preachers and prophets

11) A sensory deprivation chamber for deep introspection

12) A forum for active debates

13) A jail for those who violate the TOS

14) A rumor mill

15) Illuminati enclave for MiBs and disinformation

16) And, of course, the news desk with the latest headlines

Everything would need to be hyperlinked. If you saw an interesting device in the museum, you would want to review any patents and documentation for the device from the library, examine any experimental evidence, and participate in any discussions.

Anyone serving time in jail would have read-only priveleges, except with the other inmates.


Did I forget anything?

[RunningBare]

Did I forget anything?

Yeah, time and resources, I do not know if you remember but I did attempt this kind of thing in VR using Steorn as the basis, it had several visitors over the course of a month, not worth my time and effort.

[RunningBare]

http://www.99polls.com/poll_66574

Yes, I believe Sterling Allan is a sincere truthful honest person but misguided.
25 Votes (28%)
No, Sterling Allan is well aware that he continues to perpetuate a fraud bringing shame on the free energy community
63 Votes (72%)

[RunningBare]

http://www.99polls.com/poll_66574

Yes, I believe Sterling Allan is a sincere truthful honest person but misguided.
25 Votes (28%)
No, Sterling Allan is well aware that he continues to perpetuate a fraud bringing shame on the free energy community
64 Votes (72%)