Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stan Meyer Energy is Stolen from The Sun

Started by L505, May 29, 2009, 02:49:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

quarktoo

Quote from: L505 on May 29, 2009, 02:49:59 AM
Actually, I found some information stating that Stan Meyer actually steals energy from the Sun. This is new to me since before I found him in videos stating that the energy was from the vacuum or from "God" (sigh).

If it comes from the Sun, it would explain where it comes from without it being from Magical sources.

Some quotes below:

http://www.automorrow.com/articles/meyers2.html

"Nitrous oxide formation is held to a minimum." (end quote)

Ahh, but is it in YOUR cells? Lightening causes fertilizer...

(begin quote) "When you ignite gases from water, the by-product is a de-energized water mist which goes out the exhaust," Meyer explained. "It's an open energy system. The water mist is then re-energized by absorbing photon energy from the sun and then returning to the earth's water supply in the form of rain for energy re-use. We can also use a dosed, transparent recycling system to keep the vapors from going out into the atmosphere, yet still allow the photon energy absorption process to take place. This is now being looked at for possible future use"...

..."The Water Fuel Cell only uses natural energy present in our environment," said Meyer. "It doesn't add to or subtract from universal energy that is already present in the combustible gas atoms of water. All we have done is tap into this universal energy safely."  (end quote)

Hmmm.... at one point Stan was saying it was from the Vacuum. From this source in 1993/1994 he says it is from the sun? Is the energy from both the sun and the vacuum, or just the Sun alone? or does the Sun recharge the vacuum?  These questions are not necessarily meant for you to answer right now, because you probably can't - they are just to ponder.

http://www.automorrow.com/articles/meyers2.html

Warning: anyone working on the Stan Meyer device better be pretty careful about what they are doing to our environment and water supply. (if  the stan meyer system is even legitimate; I have small faith that it is.)

This could also mean something happened to Water when earth was formed.. and it absorbed energy through photons. Could even tie into evolution and/or Big Bang theories. Is it pseudoscience though? I do not know.


Meyer is referring to the oxygen ozone cycle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone-oxygen_cycle

He produced a powerful form of ozone O4 in the air gas processor. The Ozone and water mist were injected at 120 PSI into the injector and a "high voltage high frequency arc" bond cleaved the covalent electron off the excited H2O molecule using the stronger attraction force of the O4 atom which instantly cleaved (common chemistry term) "fractured" Meyer's term or "shattered" Puharich's term the H2O molecule.

Meyer did not use DC current so Faraday's law does not apply. "restrict the flow of amps allowing voltage to take over"

The H2o molecule will cleave into HHO is superheated and allowed to vent. It is called a superheated steam explosion.

In the early version of Meyer (tube cell) it was a very different process - still not DC electrolysis but close as Meyer referred to it as "rippled DC current" and resonant VIC.

I could go into more detail but it would be speculative in places so I will decline and stick to the facts that are well documented.

It is worth noting that ozone has been taken all the way out to O8 and is referred to as red oxygen. The magnetic particles that Meyer used in his motionless generator "magnecules" as Santilli calls them, and sells them as were most likely O4 and not O3.

I think Farrah Day has a chemistry background, perhaps she could expand on which forms of ozone are magnetic if it is.

Odd that Dr. Santilli in Florida seems to have wound up with some of Meyer's technology.

newbie123

Quote from: quarktoo on June 12, 2009, 03:09:02 AM

Meyer is referring to the oxygen ozone cycle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone-oxygen_cycle

He produced a powerful form of ozone O4 in the air gas processor. The Ozone and water mist were injected at 120 PSI into the injector and a "high voltage high frequency arc" bond cleaved the covalent electron off the excited H2O molecule using the stronger attraction force of the O4 atom which instantly cleaved (common chemistry term) "fractured" Meyer's term or "shattered" Puharich's term the H2O molecule.


Really?   Where does Stan Meyer explain this?
Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

quarktoo

Quote from: newbie123 on June 12, 2009, 10:35:35 AM

Really?   Where does Stan Meyer explain this?

His Colorado lectures, his notes, his air gas processor sitting on the back of the dune buggy.

newbie123

Quote from: quarktoo on June 12, 2009, 03:12:34 PM
His Colorado lectures, his notes, his air gas processor sitting on the back of the dune buggy.
Can you give me a specific reference?  I've read most of S. Meyer's papers (a while ago) but I don't remember seeing this.
Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

quarktoo

Quote from: newbie123 on June 12, 2009, 04:18:27 PM
Can you give me a specific reference?  I've read most of S. Meyer's papers (a while ago) but I don't remember seeing this.


Read them again, it is most of what he talked about.