Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[MileHigh]

Aaron and Rosemary:

This posting is going to focus exclusively on the DSO and what you are going to do with it.  The clock is running, you have had it for a few days so I assume that you will have to return it by the end of this coming week at the latest.

It's most unfortunate in that you were asked repeatedly what your plans were for the DSO and the question was repeatedly ignored.  What happened to being open and sharing with your data?

From what I can see, over the past few days you looked at the voltage profile of the spikes in the circuit with the DSO, perhaps giving you a clearer picture as compared to your other scopes.  Then you went on a wild goose chase and wasted a day where you reconfigured the Ainsley circuit and turned it into a solid state Bedini circuit and showed that the solid state Bedini circuit could recharge a battery.  That's all fine and dandy but big deal, it has nothing to do with your experiment.

Here is the deal:  Your DSO shows up online as used piece of equipment for sale for about $6000 USD.  This probably meas that it was about $15,000 - $20,000 USD when it was launched in the marketplace.  So a beautiful $15,000 piece of measuring equipment is yours to play with for free, and it's time to start doing something really useful with it.  You should drop all thoughts of running you battery rundown tests until after you return the DSO.

Rosemary, I am going to quote you:

The benefit is always there. The extreme benefit is with resonance.

Aaron has also made the pitch that there is much more benefit with "oscillation" or "resonance." and you are repeating the same mantra.

I have asked Aaron repeatedly to explain WHY this would be the case and he has repeatedly ignored my question.  I now pose the same question to you.

Here is a suggestion:

1.  Explain your theory behind the mechanism behind the "extreme benefit" due to "resonance."

2.  Make a series of measurements with the DSO to validate or invalidate your resonance theory.  Make various DSO measurements with and without resonance to back up your theory/claim.   Focus on making POWER MEASUREMENTS because that's what the claim is all about and that's where the action is.  Also make measurements on spike voltages, currents, and energy.  Look at the circuit in as many ways as you possibly can with the DSO in conjunction with thermal power measurements across the coil-resistor in an attempt to figure out if the "resonance" claim is real or not and TRY TO FIND OUT WHERE THE EXTRA ENERGY IS MANIFESTING ITSELF.

That is what you should be doing.  Aaron would be absolutely crazy to start running his rundown tests while the $15,000 DSO is sitting on his bench like a glorified paperweight.

In addition to this, I laid out the measurement procedure for making an accurate power consumption of the Ainsley circuit on a silver platter for both of you in a posting on the Energetic Forum a few weeks back.  Honestly, you would make yourselves look like complete and total fools if you never make that measurement.  It is essentially the same measurement being made in Rosemary's white paper, and it is a critical piece of data that is sitting in front of both of your faces like low hanging fruit, just daring you to pick it.  If Aaron doesn't make true power consumption measurements with the DSO for the standard running mode, as well as a few of your oscillatory or "resonance" modes, while at the same time making accurate temperature measurements of the coil-resistor at it's stabilized temperature - then both of you are a joke.  You were given a $15,000 DSO, and all that you did was make rundown tests?  You have got to be kidding.

Yes, I know that I am straying into "tough love" territory here and I am not being so PC.  The most important fact is that what I am saying is TRUE.

I already suggested that Aaron make the true measurement of energy in the high voltage spikes at the battery positive terminal because it is most likely that those spikes are potential only with no real energy in them - they are a fake-out.  Don't confuse what I am saying with Aaron's claim that potential-only spikes at the battery positive terminal induce "currents inside the battery that charge it."  Aaron's claim is an unsubstantiated free energy concept that would have to be backed up with data that is outside the scope of this round of testing.

There is a whole myriad of testing that could be done with the DSO.  You could try to reverse-engineer the timings for the voltage and current flow in the circuit and make a highly accurate timing diagram and energy audit trail.  The list goes on an on.

So that's the challenge for you Aaron and you Rosemary.  It's time for both of you to start thinking "outside of the box" of your battery rundown tests.  You have a fantastic piece of test equipment to play with for FREE, and you had better start doing something useful with it.

I will repeat again, if you don't even do the most basic test:  Record the voltage and current waveforms for the standard and various oscillatory modes so that you can make very accurate measurements of the power consumption and also make accurate measurements of the spike power being returned back to the battery - then both of you fall flat on your face and this is yet more of a fiasco than it already is.

Sorry for the tough talk, but that's where we appear to be since Aaron has decided to "hide" as of a couple of days ago because of some "frustration" with TK's comments or something like that.  Aaron, it's time to use one of your "mind energetics" modules to show some real character.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Joit:

I try again Milehigh
Noone cares about your Suggestions Estimations or complaining.
Really, Noone cares about, to show you a Proof, or investigate something with or for you.
You would be the last Person on Earth, whom i would show something, or want to have Progress with and i am sure, i am not alone.
Noone needs you here to put your further smarts Comments in here, leave and be quiet,
even with your crap Estimation, 'The Equipment is surely damaged'.

Okay Joit, so you want to be nasty and play "hard ball?"  My suggestions can be taken or ignored, I am fully aware of that.

I don't want to say this but I will.  Joit, you are the "village idiot" on the Energetic Forum and by extension also here.  The majority of what you state is nonsensical gibberish, and it very obvious that you have very little understanding of electricity and electronics.  Your level of "un-understanding" is so deep that nobody wants to correct you 100% of the time.  At the same time you seem to be a perfectly nice and honest person as far as day to day life goes.  When you talk about energy and electricity and electronics you become the village idiot.

Your spelling and strange grammatical constructs are getting old and tiresome.  I can't believe that you don't know how to spell "battery" and still appear to have your own special way to mangle English syntax even though you have probably been on the Energetic Forum for years and have been downloading and reading all sorts of information - in English.

So are you a strange ephemeral pixie faerie character that floats around like a butterfly and talks about electronics in a strange incomprehensible pixie faerie dialect, or is it all an act?

I am truly trying to help Aaron and Rosemary even if there is tension in the air.  Like I said before I am trying to help them discover what is going on by themselves, because that is the only way they are going to believe the data.

If you are going to always act like this strange floating pixie faerie character that speaks gibberish in tongues, that's your choice.

MileHigh

[WilbyInebriated]

OK, I amend my previous statement to "you have given mostly nothing but insults."  And TK amended his statement to "nearly exact" replication.

But this post of your is a perfect example of your lack of cognitive reasoning skills.  You nitpicked and found an inaccuracy.  But so what?  The inaccuracy is not relevant.  Just because you gave someone a halfway sorta compliment does not raise any kind of responisbility on their part to be accountable to you for anything.

Nobody owes you jack.  You don't like the experiment as described?  Do your own, instead of throwing a tantrum about it.  This is not your project - you did not commission it.  You therefore have zero standing to complain about the way it has been carried out.

and you still have a post which is a outright lie which you have to withdraw, i'm just letting you stick your foot all the way down your throat before i roast you...

no that post is a perfect example of me calling out a liar... the accuracy is COMPLETELY relevant, you said i gave nothing but insults (a baseless lie), i showed otherwise.
it's not hard to do. most of what you post is inaccuarate.
what is irrelevant is your allusion that a half compliment is relative to accountability...

wrong again. if he posts it here on a FORUM, it is open for criticism and review. too bad if you don't like that fact that i pointed out your hero is a liar with no integrity or credibility, much like yourself.

[WilbyInebriated]

Joit:

Okay Joit, so you want to be nasty and play "hard ball?"  My suggestions can be taken or ignored, I am fully aware of that.

I don't want to say this but I will.  Joit, you are the "village idiot" on the Energetic Forum and by extension also here.  The majority of what you state is nonsensical gibberish, and it very obvious that you have very little understanding of electricity and electronics.  Your level of "un-understanding" is so deep that nobody wants to correct you 100% of the time.  At the same time you seem to be a perfectly nice and honest person as far as day to day life goes.  When you talk about energy and electricity and electronics you become the village idiot.

Your spelling and strange grammatical constructs are getting old and tiresome.  I can't believe that you don't know how to spell "battery" and still appear to have your own special way to mangle English syntax even though you have probably been on the Energetic Forum for years and have been downloading and reading all sorts of information - in English.

So are you a strange ephemeral pixie faerie character that floats around like a butterfly and talks about electronics in a strange incomprehensible pixie faerie dialect, or is it all an act?

I am truly trying to help Aaron and Rosemary even if there is tension in the air.  Like I said before I am trying to help them discover what is going on by themselves, because that is the only way they are going to believe the data.

If you are going to always act like this strange floating pixie faerie character that speaks gibberish in tongues, that's your choice.

MileHigh

welcome to the new dark ages, where the sycophants claim to not be able to see their hero's lies and contradictions because it is too dark...

may i remind you milehigh, you still have little, if any integrity here. you dodged a bullet when tk so graciously exited, but don't think that lets you off the hook. not even for a minute. i am far from done with you...

when you lie and pretend you don't see the contradictions that have been pointed out to you numerous times, i suggest that makes you the 'village idiot'. sorry for the 'tough love'

edit: and your soliloquy of a response to sprocket... creepy you say? like your night of the long knives racial slur?  the one that got removed by the admin. that kind of creepy?

[WilbyInebriated]

Here is a little thought experiment for both of you:  (A) I ask the questions and you ignore them.  (B) A "good guy" on the Energetic Forum asks exactly the same questions and then you are compelled to answer them.

So, do the two of you have the character required to not make a distinction between (A) and (B)?

MileHigh

i'll take a shot at that one for you mh since you are so slow.
you had your chance at being listened to over there. you blew it. you were warned, you didn't listen. you got booted. so now anything you say, good, bad or otherwise is ignored.
JUST LIKE THE BOY WHO CRIED WOLF, YOUR INTEGRITY AND CREDIBILITY ARE ZERO.

your character is why you are not allowed to speak or be heard there anymore.
do you have the intelligence to make that distinction?