Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

Rosemary Ainslie · August 30, 2009, 07:02:43 PM

8MH - I've taken the trouble to read your last post because it's got the rare merit of being short. You should adopt this brevity as a more general practice as it makes your posts marginally more digestible.

Thanks for highlighting Fuzzy's results here. And may I echo Wilby's question here. When are you going to do your own tests. At least Hoppy supports his objections with actual data.

MileHigh · August 30, 2009, 07:14:49 PM

Rosemary:

Were you standing on your head to see the cooling? Or is it because you are in the Southern Hemisphere? Or because your Coriolis effect is the opposite from mine? Or did you have to drop acid to see the cooling effect?

So, do you think that Aaron's setup with the oscillation is puttting power back into the battery, or do you think that he is completely wrong?

MileHigh

P.S.:

QuoteYou should adopt this brevity as a more general practice as it makes your posts marginally more digestible.

Your fall from grace happened a long time ago. *giggles*

Rosemary Ainslie · August 30, 2009, 07:26:09 PM

MH - I think our difference is perspective because mine is still from ground level. Your's is stratospheric. I think the coriolis effect distorts yours more than mine.

I don't think energy is returned to the battery. The voltage below ground is not greater than the battery voltage. But I do think that less energy is being delivered than dissipated. Hopefully we'll see these results at higher voltage levels.

I also think it's interesting to see the 'cooling effect'. I had never even heard of this before and apparently it's well known.

MileHigh · August 30, 2009, 07:39:46 PM

Rosemary:

There is a great old joke by the comedian Steven Wright, "I put instant coffee in a microwave oven and almost went backwards in time."

Perhaps that's how you are seeing the "cooling effect." Looking forward to seeing some real results one day.

MileHigh

P.S.: I finally get it. Remember yet another antagonistic discussion with Aaron over the ambient temperature issue where .99 said that it would be normal to observe lower initial temperatures on the ceramic coil-resistor as compared to the measured room ambient temperature? Thank you Mr. FuzzyTomCat a.k.a. Glen for providing data to back up .99's statement. I tried to find some info about that online myself but was having an off searching day. It has to do with the way objects radiate heat away from their surfaces, their "emissivity", and related stuff but I could not find a definitive statement on that. Poor Aaron jumping the gun AGAIN!!! Jeeze!

So the "cooling effect" is noting more than a "discovery" about the natural properties of materials. If a mechanical engineer was around you would get the real deal on that.

Aaron wrong again!!?? Impossible! lol

Rosemary Ainslie · August 30, 2009, 07:57:17 PM

MH check out Harvey's references here. The cooling effect is accommodated in terms of classical and quantum physics. Why are you not inclined to believe it? It seems to be related to negative energy? And Aaron crossed referenced this measurement with more than one instrument. By our closest reckoning the 1.5 degrees difference over the 100 watt resistor is close to half a watt. Admittedly not much - but definitely measurable. Over and above which it seems that Fuzzy found similar values. I think that's significant.

The problem here is that the values are still so low. Hopefully the numbers will be evident with higher wattage values. That's something I'd really like to see.