Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Hoppy]

Hoppy:
Good Pics.  Where is zero volts, the line in the middle with hash marks, or where the signal settles down at the right side?

Hi Bubba1

At the RHS on the flat signal line.

Hoppy

[jibbguy]

This gets to heart of the problem of what we see here: Assumption that  the "foundation" and "101" classes we were taught in the first place were correct in all ways.

...They were not.

Once that gets through your skull, then the reasons for these endeavors here that you constantly attack might become apparent.

And there is much evidence to the contrary regarding differences in magnetic poles. Anisotropic magnets are a fact (U.S. Patent No. 6,787,083 ). Gauss meters can even detect differences in ordinary magnets as well. Researchers have reported that a North pole of a magnet can indeed be "different" than the South in both behavior and intensity.

A few days ago, a Paper describing the empirical discovery of magnetic monopoles released from researchers in Germany.

http://www.physorg.com/news171209923.html

They didn't cover that in freshman science either

To be so smug and sure in what you know about science, must be psychologically comforting. But it is not logical.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Of course the believers will argue that both have been met, but those familiar in the art know that -5.4mV in a sea of noise hardly qualifies as either in this particular setup.

.99

If there is a net zero current flow from the delivery of a battery supply source - then what measurement would prove this? Zero? Greater zero? Less zero? Where are your brains? How can a zero net loss be proven if any measurement at zero is considered NOISE?

I'm posting this answer here to accommodate any readers who do not read both forums and both threads.  Else your conclusions here will be the only one on record.  You'll note the edit but this is, in any event, for the record together with this second post reference and a second marginal edit.

And with reference to 'faulty meter' read uncalibrated, insensitive, whatever you want. I'm simply stating that it may not be equal to the required voltage measurement. Let me remind you - it was required by you. And - let me stress, the Tektronix is well able to deal with this measurement. It entirely eludes me why you should have wanted an alternative instrument unless you were looking for inferior data. I also do not understand why Aaron ever obliged you here. The real joke is that having done the measurement which you called for - you then discount it on the basis of the the instrument not giving a correct value. So, so strange. You really do treat us like idiots.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

I have attached scope shots taken across the 0.25R mosfet circuit shunt resistor. The first is with the batteries commoned to ground (Fig.1). The second is as connected in Fig. 4. Both waveforms are at 20mV / 0.2uS per div & x10 probe.

EDIT: Both waveforms DC coupled.

Hoppy

Am I missing something here Hoppy?  The two waveforms look so much the same with possibly a marginal improvement over the first?  Would you mind explaining this?

[Hoppy]

Am I missing something here Hoppy?  The two waveforms look so much the same with possibly a marginal improvement over the first?  Would you mind explaining this?

Rosemary,

Only that the waveforms are different and could affect the result at the extremely low power levels that Aaron was measuring in his circuit. As Aaron needs to re-test in line with Harvey's recommendation, he could try the other shunt configuration in his next series of tests.

Hoppy