Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hoppy - on Aaon's negative voltage he is getting considerably more than COP>17

And as for tidying up his circuit - I'm sure he'll attend to the necessary not to impress you but to satisfy himself.  You will recall that the circuit was partially dismantled in order to place shunts all over the place.  Under test conditions this would not be necessary.

BTW - I think we should leave the objects of the test to the experimenters.  I don't think you're in a position to dictate the direction these tests should run - with the utmost respect.  Nor do I think it in anyone's interest to disregard interesting data because it does not 'fit' with your requirements here.

[Hoppy]

Hoppy - on Aaon's negative voltage he is getting considerably more than COP>17

And as for tidying up his circuit - I'm sure he'll attend to the necessary not to impress you but to satisfy himself.  You will recall that the circuit was partially dismantled in order to place shunts all over the place.  Under test conditions this would not be necessary.

BTW - I think we should leave the objects of the test to the experimenters.  I don't think you're in a position to dictate the direction these tests should run - with the utmost respect.  Nor do I think it in anyone's interest to disregard interesting data because it does not 'fit' with your requirements here.

Rosemary,

The data is not reliable because his setup is poor. I'm not trying to dictate the direction the tests should be run, just suggest good practice, so that EE's may take notice and show a genuine interest, rather than simply criticise and laugh as has been happening up to now.

Hoppy

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

I give you credit for your tenacity.  I intend to see more results come in and see what happens.  Aaron has been laying low with the DSO, let's hope that he produces some new data.  The reality is that what he produces will be scrutinized honestly, as it should be.  The honest scrutinization can get nasty depending on the merits of the data and how the debate ensues.  It's all very existentialist and the human condition.  I remember seeing this documentary about Northern Ireland, and how kids on the rooftops on opposite sides of the wall would throw stones at each other.

Speaking of the Turing test:  The Turing test is fascinating, it is to determine if you are having a conversation with a real person or a computer running artificial intelligence software that mimics a human being's interactions.  So you start up a conversation about any subject and go from there.

.99 and all qualifiers:

I mentioned qualifying people and it seems to me that there are some "fissures" in Lighty's armor.  I half read his efficiency and power analysis posting and it all looked legit, and I came to the same conclusion as you about him jumping into the thread late.

But this:

You are quite right in the sense that it would be wise to first reproduce the original experiment. However that also means that same resistors should be used (same types and manufacturers- not just same inductance and resistance values)

I don't buy that, and I just posted about that issue.  Hmmmm....  Now I am suspicious.

or drives it into self oscillation resistive and reactive losses must be addressed.

I am going to be a little bit picky here and take issue with someone with his knowledge level using the term "reactive losses" but at the same time I am willing to cut him some slack.

So I am not so sure about Lighty now.  That's just the way I think and I thought that I would state it here.

Plus he beat you up and spanked your ass!!  lol

MileHigh

[poynt99]

I don't buy that, and I just posted about that issue.  Hmmmm....  Now I am suspicious.

I am going to be a little bit picky here and take issue with someone with his knowledge level using the term "reactive losses" but at the same time I am willing to cut him some slack.

So I am not so sure about Lighty now.  That's just the way I think and I thought that I would state it here.

Plus he beat you up and spanked your ass!!  lol

MileHigh

Did he? Well, I just got back from buying my active microphone for the new camera, so I haven't looked back at EF to see the licking I've been taking after my last posts, but thanks for looking out for me MH and Hoppy. Video coming shortly I hope 

@ powercat

.99

[poynt99]

Regarding lighty...

Looks like a No-Go. My current impression is that he's from the same line of cookie cutters Harvey came from. Not that it matters anyway. Results will speak for themselves.

.99