Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[MileHigh]

Glen:

If I can offer you some advice:

I was only going to make a resistor like the one I left with you ..... but your suggestion of making one wound in the opposite direction is a "great" idea  I'll just have to make two now

There is no need to do this.  It is a common theme that comes up regularly on the forums, to try winding your coils in the "opposite" direction.  It's simply a myth.

If you take a coil and reverse the wires connected to it, you reverse the direction of its magnetic field.

If you make a new coil that is wound in the opposite direction then you reverse the direction of its magnetic field.

Conclusion:  Going to the trouble of making a coil that is wound in the opposite direction is identical to just keeping your original coil and reversing the wire connections.

Plus, and it is a big plus:  The direction of the magnetic field itself in this experiment has no bearing on anything.  Some people on the forums have a belief that there is a "difference between North and South."  This is NOT TRUE, they are essentially the same when it comes to this experiment, building a Bedini motor, etc.  This is a metaphysically true and indisputable fact.

That is your rational reason for not making a second coil.  It gives you absolutely nothing.  Spread the word!!!  lol

MileHigh

[the_big_m_in_ok]

MileHigh said:

Conclusion:  Going to the trouble of making a coil that is wound in the opposite direction is identical to just keeping your original coil and reversing the wire connections.

I agree in principal with MileHigh.  Older patents regularly did this as a matter peculiar to the electronic design.
It would then be easier to reconfigure an experiment, right?

--Lee

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

For Marko Rodin - that's a complete no go.  My words could get very harsh.  For some reason, I have watched his clips and I know about the Rodin Coil.

The Rodin coil is just a coil, it has properties of inductance and parasitic capacitance.  That's it - it's much ado about nothing.  At one point Marko says, "The mathematical fingerprint of God" - omg.

Some people demonstrate it's loudspeaker-like effects, without being able to explain why.

Marko Rodin looks like he teaches Yoga to Southern Californian housewives and eats lots of rice out of a bowl.  In another clip he casually claims that the "Rodin Coil" is going to start an energy revolution.

I get a similar vibe from the other two guys.

It's all off the deep end.  Sorry if that was upsetting to you but that's the deal as I see it...

MileHigh

[Rosemary Ainslie]

MileHigh:

Marko Rodin has some compelling number relationships around 9.  He's a strange character - talks really big money - all over the place which is something probably better left unsaid.  But clearly he is now getting funding for stuff that he couldn't get funded before?  And I doubt it that investors would put that much into anything without some reason for some real interest.

Secondly, his side kick - Jamie Buturff is easy on the eye and ear.  Unfortunately - as pointed out by Nassim Haramein - his measurements analysis leaves room for improvement.  But he does indeed illustrate some neat arrangements.  Let me tell you since you wont watch it.  He uses the Rodin Coil to run a frictionless brushless motor - which is neat.  Then.  He is able to run a large number of motors concurrently by juxtaposing them to that live coil.  And then he proceeds to demonstrate that the current drawn is reduced.  Apparently this happens with each new load.   Then - to compound confusion - he shows that the more 'load' applied to each motor - reduces the drawdown further.  And you're not impressed?

Regarding the 'philosophy' of Marko Rodin?  It's strangely compelling.  He apparently has no 'college' eduction?  Is that the same thing as university education in the States?  Just don't know.  But his knowledge base is pretty impressive and he's been studied by mathematicians all over the place.  I'm satisfied that he's found a new number sequence - at it's least.  And  I'm impressed with his evident sensitivity and tact.  Rather resent his claim to have discovered the God Particle.  And I don't entirely buy into Nassim Haramein's claim to have done that final resolution of all things - thing.  I can't see how he has got the answer without including new dimensions - yet acknowledges that the electron 'disappears' into the 'void' - I think he called it.  String theorists give the 'void' some dimensions.  And I think appropriately.  But he's trying to do what Einstein tried to do.  And Einstein is definitely my hero among giants.

So you see MH.  By simply not looking you lose out.  And that's the nub of my quarrel with you.  You never really get to grips with altrnate arguments and just stick to your own.  But I must admit that you also give your own enough variation and interest to keep me reading you.  Endlessly inventive.  But the chocolate thingy thing?  That was your best.  Have it printed and filed.  Really it deserves to be framed.   

[fuzzytomcat]

Glen:

If I can offer you some advice:

There is no need to do this.  It is a common theme that comes up regularly on the forums, to try winding your coils in the "opposite" direction.  It's simply a myth.

If you take a coil and reverse the wires connected to it, you reverse the direction of its magnetic field.

If you make a new coil that is wound in the opposite direction then you reverse the direction of its magnetic field.

Conclusion:  Going to the trouble of making a coil that is wound in the opposite direction is identical to just keeping your original coil and reversing the wire connections.

Plus, and it is a big plus:  The direction of the magnetic field itself in this experiment has no bearing on anything.  Some people on the forums have a belief that there is a "difference between North and South."  This is NOT TRUE, they are essentially the same when it comes to this experiment, building a Bedini motor, etc.  This is a metaphysically true and indisputable fact.

That is your rational reason for not making a second coil.  It gives you absolutely nothing.  Spread the word!!!  lol

MileHigh

Hi MH,

I think we were discussing at one time that if one end of the load resistor was pointed only at the mosfet within it seemed 30 degrees , the circuit went a little wacky ...... thus the CW CCW winding direction question thing .....

I'll take your advice under consideration on making a second prototype with a different winding direction .... I've never had a opportunity to make these kinds of devices and being I have enough "Ni Cr A" 80% nickel, 20% chromium wire to do four (4) more resistors and It takes 30 minutes to wind and 24 hours to dry it's not that big of deal to make.

What is you thoughts on the resistor wire spacing ....... the article states a 1mm spacing with AWG 20 [.032 dia] ( .6348 ohms ft )a diameter of 32 mm ( 100.5308 mm / 3.9579 in circumference ) 48 turns of resistance wire (4825.4784 mm / 189.9795 in / 15.8316 ft long) = 10.0499 ohms this makes the coil about + - 3.416" long on a tube with a length of 150 mm (5.9055 in long)

It just seems strange to me and could be a article misprint or error, could the spacing be wider to accommodate a tube of the specified length and do you think it could possibly make any difference in any way ?

Fuzzy