Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Fuzzy.  Golly.    

I've been rolling.  Clearly our kitty has claws.  And so little said?  That's true eloquence.   

[PaulLowrance]

Paul - what's the matter with you?  If you had MH's abilities we could at least laugh.  But your posts are boring, repetitiive, pedantic and dull witted.  A troll with no teeth.  Nothing sadder.   

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

In my opinion the most significant thing that happened recently is that I reverse engineered the ringdown and explained the current spike back to the battery, and .99 indicated that he agrees with the analysis.  If Aaron had only generated that data 2 1/2 months ago.

That is giving you and others insight into all of the oscillation effects that you are observing.  It is the kernel of knowledge that gives you a clue to all of the energy returned to the battery with all of the random or repetitive waveforms we have seen.  I don't expect it to be acknowledged on the other side though by the big cheese himself or any cheesettes.  Harvey might.

Just the fact that Marko and Jamie will leave up their clips where they feign creating a magnetic monopole stinks.  I just can't understand the selective nature of the "believers."  For me they are nothing more than sleazy carneys running a ring-toss concession.  The stupid coil does nothing that I am aware of.  The "look it can act as a speaker" trick is laughable nonsense.  Nothing will ever come out of this except one or two people will be able to eak out a living in the free energy cottage industry like barnacles casting their money nets into the stream filled with "believer fishies" carrying dollar bills.  It's that bad and I won't say any more about those scammers.

Please back off on the "Deanna Troi" daily barometer readings directed at me and then at yourself.  Just be cool.

The believer gang on EF love to hurl insults at myself and .99 and others.  Have you noticed?  It's pure cognitive dissonance in action.  We are so stupid that we get everything wrong and we are too stupid to even understand how a flashlight works.  We are "slow thinkers" that can't understand harnessing back-EMF.  Did you see all that?  What a joke.  Nobody is without sin, but in my case I try to be selective and only do it to call out the sheer utter nonsense coming from the mouths of people that are positioning themselves as some kind of authority figures.  In other words, I don't initiate it gratuitously, I only fire when the target presents itself.  Call me an entartiste.  On your side I fully understand that you are in a delicate position.

Glen:

You are welcome.  I am going to pose some "solid" questions your way:  What is your next step?  What about those two data logs that you did with the various temperature readings and battery voltages and all that stuff, what is supposed to be done with that data?  What do you have to say about it yourself?

Do you know what to do with the DSO to give you your power readings?  If not do you want some advice on that?  I am being PC since I got spanked by Rosemary and so I am asking you first.

MileHigh

[poynt99]

MH,

I agree with some of your analysis, however I have another explanation for the negative spike, post Gate-OFF.

First off, I did not read Harvey's post, but after you mentioned it, I took a look. He's not even close to the mark with his induction theory. In fact he mentions then all together dismisses the correct answer.

Here's what's causing that negative pulse on the shunt that is coincident with the positive inductive spike on the Drain:

When the MOSFET finally does switch OFF (it is a slow one indeed), the Drain voltage spikes positive relative to ground, but the inductor energizing current not only begins decreasing, it eventually passes through 0 Amps and begins increasing in the negative or opposite direction. It is this current inversion in concert with the positive voltage spike that creates this negative spike, and all the subsequent negative excursions on the shunt during ringdown.

I am confident this can be experimentally verified with the present setup.

.99

[MileHigh]

Hey Poynt,

You had me thinking there again, and there is a funny tag line that somebody has, "I'll see your theory, and raise you mine!"  lol

For starters, I agree with you about Harvey's induction theory being wrong.  Any induction would me minuscule relative to the LC shakedown.  After that I was lost.  I just didn't go into details.

Now for the breakdown.  Joit, Aaron, Jibbguy pay attention!  lol

Let's reference the third plot in Glen's posting:

http://www.energeticforum.com/69850-post2875.html

Also, to discuss the action in the upper-right quadrant of the graph, let's say T=0 ten small divisions to the right of the center line.  This means the main spike centers on T=5.2.  Everybody get that?

At T=4.5 the MOSFET has switched off, the current is zero.  So why does the current keep shooting down after T=4.5, which of course means that it just changed direction.

A very significant and subtle thing happens at T=4.5.  Let's put aside the reversing current and the apparent continuity in the current waveform through the reversal for a second.

The significant thing that happens is that the MOSFET has switched off, which implies that the coil has switched off, but the voltage at the drain keeps increasing.  The only explanation for this is that the current in the coil has not yet switched off completely and is continuing to charge the stray capacitance right up until T=5.2.

So we are in a strange state where the inductor has finally discharged fully into the stray capacitance.  The discharge for the coil goes through two phases, the first phase is when the coil burns through the switching-off MOSFET.  Then the MOSFET "disappears" because it is fully switched off, and the second phase of the discharge is the coil charging up the stray capacitance.

There is "smoking gun" proof of this.  The first part of the drain waveform (light blue trace) is more or less exponential in form as the coil discharges through the MOSFET.  (This waveform is actually quite complicated.  It is the intersection of the coil discharging with the MOSFET absolute resistance increasing as it switches off.)  The second part of the waveform after T=4.5 is sinusoidal.  The MOSFET is gone and you switch over to a sinusoidal waveform as the coil charges the stray capacitance.  Just have a look at some of Glen's later waveforms and you can see it as clear as a bell.  (First plot in post #2893.)

It's all quite unusual, the coil is only fully switched off at T=5.2.  This is the point when there is no current flowing through the coil, and there is no voltage drop across the coil.  So both sides of the coil are at 230 volts, the same voltage as the stray capacitance between the source pin (the "ground") and the drain pin.

And the problem is if there is no current flowing through the coil, and yet we are at maximum reverse current through the body diode.  How do you explain this?

That's it for now, too late to continue.

MileHigh