Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

Started by TinselKoala, June 16, 2009, 09:52:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

PaulLowrance

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on November 05, 2009, 01:45:36 PM
so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is extremely difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?

You can't read? In case you have the comprehension of an ape, try this: His measurements are meaningless to people unless he can prove he's capable of making such complex measurements.

I'm still waiting for your answer. What's the matter, you can't answer? As expected.

Paul

PaulLowrance

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on November 05, 2009, 01:51:01 PM
paul of course i know how to spell it. if you could read and had followed this thread at all you would have seen me spell it out entirely. but you haven't ::) you are a pauly come lately that thinks they know it all... we have seen more than one of you come and go in this thread.

so i am a bad guy, whaa cry. and then what does that make you? kinda of puts you down on what you consider to be my 'kid' level now doesn't it?

and yet you still have NOT answered this...
so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is extremely difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?

More handwaving, huh?  What scientist would want to hang out in this thread for very long. And if you think you know more about taking measurements then me, then bring it on little boy.

Paul

PaulLowrance

You two handwavers are a waste of time. I've answered your silly questions. Now I'll sit back and wait for you to show us how to properly measure the correct real power from current pulses through a wire wound resistive element.

We'll all see that you are incapable of showing the correct method.  IMO .99 posts are the only ones worthy of reading. The rest of you are spammers trying to destroy a thread with kindergarten measurements.

Paul

WilbyInebriated

Quote from: PaulLowrance on November 05, 2009, 01:54:32 PM
More handwaving, huh?  What scientist would want to hang out in this thread for very long. And if you think you know more about taking measurements then me, then bring it on little boy.

Paul
paul i would suggest you look up what it (ad hom) means. then you can try and explain how i was subverting or misdirecting or rejecting an argument by saying the things you quoted. ::)

here, i will help you out since you are so damn lazy.
"An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:

   1. Person A makes claim X.
   2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
   3. Therefore A's claim is false.
"

and yet you still have NOT answered this...
so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is extremely difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?

yes or no pauly
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: PaulLowrance on November 05, 2009, 01:36:21 PM

fuzzy is a little mind IMO, and rarely deserves responding to. He wants to talk about battery measurements when we're talking about taking complex scope measurements consisting of pulses.

Paul

Paulycomelately - to borrow Wilby's description - I LOVE THIS.  Fuzzy is a 'little mind'?  And the "we're talking about taking complex scope measurements?  LOL  You're talking to yourself and about yourself.  So sweet - such huge presumptions. 

Pauly arose one dark night
In a sweat - in a horrible fright
For a thought that he thunk
had horribly sunk
To the dark - from a previous light.

He cried out in pain as he said
'Dear Heaven that thunk thought has fled'
And he clutched in the dark
But was way off the mark
Saying 'Maybe it's under my bed'.

But the search through the night was in vain
As his stomach was knotted in pain
And in a state of alarm
That did bodily harm
Knew the vacuum that now filled his brain.