Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

Let's stop wasting time and effort and get on with agreeing a method and procedure that anyone can use with readily available and innexpensive test equipment.

Hoppy

sounds good hoppy. why don't you gather all the cynics, debunkers and believers together and come to a consensus on what that method and procedure is, since you can't seem to agree amongst yourselves. if/when you get that accomplished then present it before rose, harvey, fuzzy, etc. (the true skeptics) for final consensus.

i'm curious about this suggested 'time saver' of yours "using readily available and innexpensive [sic] test equipment". is it going to hold any weight with academia?

[utilitarian]

sounds good hoppy. why don't you gather all the cynics, debunkers and believers together and come to a consensus on what that method and procedure is, since you can't seem to agree amongst yourselves. if/when you get that accomplished then present it before rose, harvey, fuzzy, etc. (the true skeptics) for final consensus.

i'm curious about this suggested 'time saver' of yours "using readily available and innexpensive [sic] test equipment". is it going to hold any weight with academia?

Maybe a little perspective is in order.  No one is paying anyone to do anything.  A successful validation is not an easy thing, and would only serve the interests of the inventor.   Hoppy is not obligated to do this, and if nothing is done, then the invention can languish in obscurity for all time.  So maybe drop the condescending tone?

If you want to hire a team to do a validation to your specifications, maybe you should pony up the money and do that, and then you can criticize their approach to your heart's content and they will be obligated to listen to you.  But not until then.

[Grumpy]

Engineers have been building power pulse circuits for decades using load resistors and topologies similar to the so called "Ainslie" circuit. Those skilled in the art know that there is nothing novel about the circuit except for the claimed COP. It is strange that no one has observed this effect before (again, if it is real).

And if it is real we should all be heating our homes for less than one cent per equivalent kilowatt hour.(cost here is about 17 cents per kWhr).

The proof of the pudding is in the (h)eating   

[WilbyInebriated]

Maybe a little perspective is in order.  No one is paying anyone to do anything.  A successful validation is not an easy thing, and would only serve the interests of the inventor.   Hoppy is not obligated to do this, and if nothing is done, then the invention can languish in obscurity for all time.  So maybe drop the condescending tone?

If you want to hire a team to do a validation to your specifications, maybe you should pony up the money and do that, and then you can criticize their approach to your heart's content and they will be obligated to listen to you.  But not until then.

who said anyone was paying anybody? this is just more of your irrelevance... only serve the interests of the inventor? LOL
noone said hoppy is 'obligated'... where do you get this crap from?

red herring logical fallacy and more irrelevance...

[utilitarian]

who said anyone was paying anybody? this is just more of your irrelevance... only serve the interests of the inventor? LOL
noone said hoppy is 'obligated'... where do you get this crap from?

more irrelevance...

I was referring to your sarcastic post.  Anytime you quote someone and include "(sic)", it's pretty much a sure sign of being an ass.  Yea we get it, there is a spelling error and you're aware of it.  You're so smart to spot that!

So just saying, if you don't like what some of these validators are doing, organize your own team.  As it is now, you have zero standing to be issuing directives.