Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[TinselKoala]

I've never seen so many people scared of the truth in all my life.

Please no more pen jockey ideas or technical explanations as they have no basis in reality. Do the experiments and post them, otherwise, keep your uninformed distracting opinions to yourselves.

This thread is for duplication of the circuit and constructive talk of the results even by people not duplicating. I don't mind "skepticism" but outright misinformation will not be tolerated so please give it up.

Amazing. Isn't it? The hypocrisy astounds me. How can a single brain hold such contradictory statements in such close proximity without burning out? I suppose the insulation must be very very strong.

[TinselKoala]

I'm posting these comments on Aaron's video. How long will they last? I am asking legitimate questions.

Nice load resistor. What's its inductance? I estimate it at between 150 and 200 microHenrys. In other words, roughly twenty times the value of Ainslie's 8.64 microHenrys. So your "replication" fails right there.

Or is that figure in Ainslie's paper a misprint, like the circuit diagram, too?

Just asking. After all, we wouldn't want any misinformation posted, now, would we?

and

Is that 555 timer constructed according to the Quantum article diagram? If not, why not? That article still has not been corrected by Ainslie so we must assume that it was the one she used, until she tells us exactly otherwise. After all, she still has the circuit in her possession.

and

3:10
talk real fast, say "right" and think we'll miss it? No, not right. Some is being stored in the inductor's mag field, and after the fet turns off and the field is collapsing by bouncing back and forth between the inductances and capacitances in the circuit, that's when this stored energy is dissipated. See the ringdown on the end of your spikes? That's this stored energy sloshing back and forth. See it exponentially decreasing? That's because it is being dissipated as heat.

And I will try to post This old vid of mine as a "reply"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tW2g4KinuA

[TinselKoala]

Well, that's ten minutes of my life I'll never get back.

Nice views of the tabletop and under the workbench, btw.

I'm flabbergasted. They were perfectly right to ban me. There is no way I can possibly communicate with someone who will not even read the manual for their oscilloscope.

Self-oscillation? You mean uncontrolled feedback due to poor construction (screwing the mosfet to the workbench!! ROTMFFLMAO I have Never seen that one before); and the fact that you cannot resolve it on your scope tells me that you cannot use an oscilloscope properly. When you figure out how to set your scope's trigger correctly, you will be able to resolve that signal, because while it might be self-oscillation, it certainly is also regular, not a-periodic or random.

Ahh, a blast from the past:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxabhjHoV50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwbdvDms0Bk

[TinselKoala]

I wonder what the COP is of this device.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxEpSX2Hd54

Or this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir9RIsXzmzY

[TinselKoala]

Aaron says:

TK has been defended as an apparent expert with credentials and I think he bragged about published papers, etc... but couldn't even intentionally get the mosfet into self oscillation but I could. Therefore, the argument is null and void. The argument of credentials stands or it doesn't and is not subject to "conditions."

And I say: See the led glowing a bit, even when the "switch" is open??? What is the matter with your eyeballs?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSFS99SaZTA