Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[TinselKoala]

Besides, this oscillation thing is Yet another Red Herring.

Anyone with eyeballs can see that I have already reproduces essentially the heating profile that Ainslie claimed to get, and I'm using a known fast risetime clean 3 percent dutycycle with no parasitic oscillations. And my input power figures are nearly the same as Ainslie's.

The appearance of battery recharging and the accounting of the power flows through the circuit have been analyzed by Henieck and MileHigh and others, and this phenomenon also does not depend on the mosfet oscillation--as it can and has been observed in many other pulsed charging systems, that even Aaron can probably cite.

So, if the oscillation isn't necessary for the heat, and it isn't necessary for the appearance of battery recharging, what's it there for?

It is there to obfuscate the issue. Please tell me how the duty cycle figures cited in Ainslie's paper are compatible with the oscillations on Aaron's scope. Take single shots all you want...they will still result in regular traces that can be easily computed, when done properly.

(Don't forget, I have these 2 digital sampling storage oscilloscopes sitting here next to my analog ones. It is just possible that I do know whereof I speak, in spite of Aaron's enlightenment.)

[TinselKoala]

TK
Can you just add the links to the above comments [last post previous page]
Please?
Then I will delete this and headline it here and elsewhere
Chet

Done. And here they are again:
Part C:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcKg0oXtNjA
Part D:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1iRpEM0qTw

[TinselKoala]

@Ramset: Wow! That post looks a lot more aggressive over there than it does here, even with the little "edit". Some arrows will fly over that, I'm sure.

But I'm really curious about one thing:

I've done some experiments where heat was measured, and I've reported those experiments. Why hasn't there been any comment on those? I thought that photo especially would have gotten some play.

Is it because people already realize that the heat can't be OU, so they're trying to find OU in the battery charging explanation...even though we should know by now that voltage is not power, power is not energy, and energy is all that matters?

And with all this brouhaha about minor circuit variations making big differences in behavior, why hasn't Rosemary shown us the exact circuit, since she has said several times that she still has the apparatus...

You see, many direct questions have been dodged or ignored, and that is not helping people like me. Or anybody else, except those who wish to hide the truth or change history.

Rosemary, we need to see your exact circuit used, your raw data, your spreadsheet calculations, the vetting laboratory and university laboratory reports you keep citing, and so forth, in order to be able properly to evaluate your claims.

Publication in even a fringe peer-reviewed journal like JSE would need those items and more. They would need to see those things before even considering publishing a claim like COP>17.

Don't believe me? JSE is actively looking for experimental reports of this kind.

I suggest you submit your article to them and see what kind of response you get.

http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal.html

Because at the conclusion of my researches concerning your claims, I will be preparing a paper for submission to them, and you really do deserve equal time.

And I, as you know, have hard data, and I'm not afraid of scientific scrutiny.

[TinselKoala]

I have made Yet Another Video of the scope lost trigger phenomenon, using the Tek 2213A scope. As I suspected, its trigger is not as good as the Philips and it is easy to show the phenomenon Aaron demonstrated. The mosfet is oscillating because of the bad ( in Engineering terms, not Free energy terms) drive signal from the 555 timer, and at certain settings the scope loses trigger on the complex noisy signal. There is actually very little true "noise" in that signal, though.

However, when I try to upload the video I get this:

This functionality is not available right now. Please try again later.

This is clearly an attempt by the Ainslie crewe to prevent me from posting my results. They must be reading my emails and personal correspondence, and I want it stopped. I understand Ainslie takes her orders from someone called, "Jolt." Probably a pseudonym, intended to conceal a true identity.



Or it could be that YT is doing maintenance, so I'll try again in a few minutes.



(EDIT: Which delay gave me time to make Yet Another video, part F, where I trace the oscillation to the 555 timer definitely, and show again, definitely, that the oscillation is regular and Aaron's phenomenon is loss of scope trigger.)

I'll post the links here as soon as I can upload them. 

Grok the Fullness!


VERY IMPORTANT: I just realized, and confirmed, that the oscillation in my circuit, and probably Aaron's is happening when the mosfet is supposed to be OFF. Remember, the drain signal is High when the mosfet is OFF, and the 555 timer is high when the mosfet is supposed to be ON. So timer pulse High, Mosfet ON, drain signal Low.
Look at the traces. The oscillation happens before the timer is turning ON, not off, so the oscillations in the mosfet drain are causing the mosfet to leak power when it's supposed to be OFF according to the driving pulse.

Another point obfuscated by Aaron's misinformation project.

[ramset]

 Aaron said
TK's fraud
Ramset,

I don't have a smiley appropriate for this forum to respond that this deception but I'll try.

First, I'm quite aware of where I placed the timer ground originally, yes it should be on the other side of the resistor. But what has that got to do with the FACT that my circuit WAS producing square waves with the resistor on the battery EXACTLY like I said? Nothing, it is a distraction from the point that my mosfet was oscillating, period but you want to jiggle a sock puppet out in the other direction so people don't see the main point.

First he claims there is NO oscillation, second it is oscillating because of bad timing signal. No consistency in what he is saying, a bit of truth goes a long way, would be good to see him demonstrate some. I can get it to oscillate to at 99% duty cycle and he gripes about the quantum circuit. lol

It should be more than obvious to anyone that he is deceiving people. He said clearly on his video that he ADMITS that he can't get his mosfet to oscillate no matter what.

That is a very clear claim. Then he says:

Here is his exact quote from ou:

"I have _at last_ been able to get some true parasitic oscillations out of my "Aaron's Rod" circuit. Now that I've got the right resistor in the positive rail...

So I've made a couple new vids, they are processing and uploading now. I'm able to show that I do get parasitic oscillations of the classic textbook kind, and I still believe that Aaron's scope is missing triggering to produce the bands that he is seeing.

The parasitic oscillations are regular, albeit quite complex."

Then he now says:
"I have linked your triggering flaw to your induced oscillations in the mosfet, which are primarily caused by your improper signal driving the mosfet."

So improper signal causes???

    * true paracitic oscillation
    * parasitic oscillations of the classic textbook kind
    * parasitic oscillation that are regular



That means that my circuit produced real clean oscillations that the scope is reading. When I zoom in, I see very clear high frequency pulses going thru the coil and the shunt. That means there is no improper signal driving the mosfet, it means that I was zoomed out too much on the scope.

He said he gets true oscillations that he can see with my circuit since he duplicated it exactly. Yet he claims at the same time that improper signal is causing the triggering flaw. Yet, if he can see the oscillations with my circuit and my circuit is dong true oscillations as he claimed word for word, then that means he has multiple personality disorder where one personality doesn't remember what the other said.

His analysis is fraud or incompetance. In either case, it is bogus. He couldn't even see his mosfet oscillating until he used my circuit and got it right! I guess I shouldn't say stole because I give it away from free. At least he has something that works now that he can learn from since nothing he built works right.
__________________
With Gratitude, Aaron