Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

Started by TinselKoala, June 16, 2009, 09:52:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 46 Guests are viewing this topic.

qiman

Quote from: newbie123 on July 28, 2009, 11:00:20 PM
I think it might be too early to conclude the claims are 100 percent bogus  ...  But there's just nothing real to talk about until there's a well documented experiment (or video even) that shows a self running circuit, ou measurements,  etc (assuming "ou" is even possible).  Until then, you guys are just arguing about speculation.

Bedini energizer is over 1.0 COP. Can easily get back 90% in secondary battery with measurable 15%+ in mechanical work in rotor. 1.05%. Everyone seems to want to ignore the mechanical work. It is an over 1.0 COP device.

The 2 stage mechanical oscillator, over 1.0 COP by quite a bit.

Peter's rotary attraction motor, over 1.0 COP.

Anyone trained in classical EE is not qualified to measure it because all the defeats are built into the math and logic.

qiman

Abbreviated response to MH from Energetic Forum:

The spike reduces what the input pulse delivers. AND, the oscillation cancels itself out.

EXCESS HEAT IN THE INDUCTIVE RESISTOR thanks to the ringing. PLUS CHARGING IN THE SUPPLY BATTERY thanks to the spike.

But make sure it is tuned or you'll get less heat and less charge for equivalent input. There is a difference.


qiman

TK, I posted your results and link to pic on Energetic Forum.
It is there for the record and I'm sure you stand behind your
results. You can verify that I posted it verbatim.

TinselKoala

Well, if you liked those results, I'm sure you will love the newest video, uploading now.

You know, if you took out the "for free" your description of your waveform above would almost be correct.
But it isn't for free, it comes from the battery, and it isn't increasing, as you can see from the nice exponential DECAY of the waveform. Each cycle is a little smaller in amplitude than the last--because some power is being dissipated as heat. Power from the battery. Not increasing--the envelope shows you that.


(Oh, and there aren't very many people, even on this forum, that believe any of those things you mentioned are even close to being OU. If you really think they are, why haven't you applied for any of the MANY prizes that you would get? If only you could PROVE IT.)

0c

So, is this Ainslie thing put to bed yet?