Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

WilbyInebriated · July 12, 2009, 01:57:34 AM

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 12, 2009, 01:53:24 AM
If you fkn agree, mostly, and if I have long ago conceded your point, then why in the world do you keep on harping on it?
It's getting to be quite ridiculous. You seem fairly intelligent for a troll, and it might be nice to actually discuss something substantive with you, if only you would change your meds or something.

Oh, I get it--you are a paid lackey of the Free Energy Gurus In White, and you are keeping me uselessly distracted on this thread, answering your inanities, while everybody else is happily developing their gravitymagnoSECgenerator, without skeptical interference.

because you still haven't shown any data with a correct replication, obviously...
just do it, put it to rest.

TinselKoala · July 12, 2009, 01:57:57 AM

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on July 12, 2009, 01:52:15 AM
you didn't know that at the time. nice misdirection though. the point remains, you used a circuit diagram which specified a irfpg50 among other components and you substituted whatever you felt like. and then proceeded to use words like identical and exact and then compared your hack to good scientific method. that's what i have always had an issue with, 30 pages running now.

Wrong yet again. The very first thing when I started this fiasco was to read everything I could find, and it's in her early material. I knew she said the mosfet wasn't critical before I did the first thing with this project.
And I did not use whatever I felt like, I used the closest match I could find at the time, after pouring over data sheets for hours.

And you will be happy to know that I have just burned up my dinner, ruined a pan, and I have nothing else to eat in the house.

So troll along off, little troll, I'm not playing with you any more. You can't even come up with a proper criticism.

TinselKoala · July 12, 2009, 01:58:40 AM

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on July 12, 2009, 01:57:34 AM
because you still haven't shown any data with a correct replication, obviously...
just do it, put it to rest.

I don't have to show you no stinkin badges.

WilbyInebriated · July 12, 2009, 02:00:27 AM

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 12, 2009, 01:57:57 AM
Wrong yet again. The very first thing when I started this fiasco was to read everything I could find, and it's in her early material. I knew she said the mosfet wasn't critical before I did the first thing with this project.
And I did not use whatever I felt like, I used the closest match I could find at the time, after pouring over data sheets for hours.

And you will be happy to know that I have just burned up my dinner, ruined a pan, and I have nothing else to eat in the house.

So troll along off, little troll, I'm not playing with you any more. You can't even come up with a proper criticism.

no you didn't or you would have pulled out the 'zipons' ad hom right away. and, if that was the case, which it's not, why wouldn't you have said that in this reply to my first critique of your 'replication'?

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 17, 2009, 09:13:03 AM
OK, several points to address.
First, yes, when I can find them I will use identical components to Ainslie's circuit. Her MOSFET is kind of pricey and will have to be ordered; the one I'm using is...well, you can look up the data. It's pretty close, good enough for prelim testing. I will replace the shunt with .25 ohm today.

wow, what an amazing confabulation you have there tk...

nobody cares... mint?

TinselKoala · July 12, 2009, 02:09:56 AM

You will please stop making things up about which you have no idea.
I first mentioned the "zipons", I believe, in my very first post on this issue. Which is not in this thread. It's in the post where I replied to ramset when he asked me to look into this matter. I'm sure you could find it, if you could just get your head out of that dark smelly place you live in.