Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[TinselKoala]

SO...

I suppose Glen will retract this statement On Energetic?

I have recommended that the testing is skewed by his own admission and that should be thrown out, you cannot cross reference "AC" and "DC" grounding through ground loops with bonded neutrals connected and have semi conductors operate 100% properly.

The one made prior to TK's vids

I dunno.
It depends on what "skewed" means, in Rosemary-speak. If it means that the groundloop must be present, than indeed my previous results are skewed. But if it means that the circuits and instruments must be properly isolated and grounded and so forth, then it probably means that Rosemary's results are skrewed. Er, I mean skewed.

Actually I think "Glen" is trying to be helpful. And I am glad he pointed out this item.

Now, if he would only use those great critical talents and his practical electronics knowledge to assess the circuit under question, instead of mine...Oh, wait...My circuit is so far the ONLY  KNOWN  Ainslie reproduction attempt that is even close to what was described in her paper, with the ability to do comparisons and control testing...

So I suppose we have to be talking about my circuit, since there aren't any others, that I can see.

[ramset]

Well...
Helpful or not he was trying to throw you, Owlsly the testing,all data Right off the bus!!

Yes Glen made a very useful observation for members to understand, it just had NOTHING to do with YOU and how you do things[the right way]

Chet
Waiting on data
PS
personally I think he Hates Owlsley [just like Wilby]

[TinselKoala]

Oh, and I totally agree that heat tests and so forth are just pilot baselines, until I can reproduce for sure the waveform used in the Quantum/EIT experiment. And I'm afraid only Rosemary can help us here.

Since she has said several times that she still has the circuit...well, you can do the math, even if she can't.

Take that thing out, there, girl, and show us what you've got. Make that booty shake for us, on camera--there will be a lot of people watching.

How many times now have we, or somebody, asked to see a scope shot from her circuit?

And next: as jibbguy pointed out, and as I also pointed out here and in the video ("hope I don't kill myself here", "school of smoking oscilloscopes" etc. ) fooling around like I did in EOU#11 is dangerous to life and equipment. Do a quick check with a DMM before you go risking your life or your equipment by trying what I showed.

I won't be doing this test on the Fluke-O-Scope because it is borrowed and I don't want to take the chance of smoking it. And the LeCroy, fergeddabout it.
To address jibbguy's speculation, the Fluke's power comes either from its internal battery or from its wall-wart isolated DC power supply/charger. So it probably would be a safe test for the Fluke, and if it were mine I'd do it in a heartbeat. But it would be just my luck, a car would hit the pole outside just as I hook it up...

Of course in the video shown, the FG and the analog scopes are providing the ground link, through the bonded line ground, back to the negative battery pole. THAT IS THE POINT of the video.

And as far as connecting the probes goes, I am connecting them as Ainslie showed in her paper, remember...not necessarily where or how I would have connected them.

The issue of isolation and groundloops does not appear to have been addressed in the EIT.pdf paper.

[ramset]

Post from Jolt

@witsend Well, anyhow, you came in with the Timer and the Mosfet.
Its only just such a mess to read there through, and i dont, when its not really needed.
Its clear for me, that -some Peoples- never do mistakes and are never wrong.
Therefor i am glad to be just here.

Btw, with the Timer, lol. What is clear now ?
I state to have ~ 10-50% Switch Time at the Mosfet with this Circuit.
Means, this Time is the Mosfet ON and do lead through S and D.
For the low Cycle it works.
When the Frequency is to high, i can lower it with the Pot at the Gate.

If its not clear, then i do make a new Thread.
Still got a new Shot, where you see the Spike equals the ON Time, not the lower Line, what is the Offtime.
Maybe my Scope shows it different then others, or, for the use of the Mosfet it is actually only different explained, what do match better.
Anyhow, i got something like this in Mind.

Otherwise, the Timercircuit is usable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This is just to show where the other replicator is.

Not the guy who's doing his damnedest to copywright some PATH TO
MONEY[peace love light and show me the money][An FE entrepreneur,WTF is that? a paradox, an oxymoron ]

Chet

[fuzzytomcat]

TK, I would assume by this statement from Rosemary Ainslie it would make me believe that any ground or grounded connection used possibly was a "Earth" ground similar to whats in the UK, Europe, Australia, Asia and Africa on all their 240 volt circuits.

http://www.energeticforum.com/61046-post801.html

Quote:

Regarding the need for grounding, and at the risk of prolonging an argument regarding this - I have to see clear evidence of the earth attached to the neck of the probe attached to the meter and across the shunt. This is sadly lacking. And from memory - that waveform looks like a single probe connection. I'm sending the link to experts at Fluke for final comment. I need to put this 'evidence' to bed. We also never saw full benefit of the scope functions. But certainly early suggestions of the Hartley effect.