Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

You simply cannot change the topology of a circuit to one that is more favourable to support your argument and then try to claim that it applies to the original circuit also.  You just CAN'T do this.  This is cognitive dissonance reality distortion at work.

so you choose to not reconcile tk's contradictory statements before moving on and continue to attempt to bury them quietly. THAT is cognitive dissonance reality distortion at work.

[Asymatrix]

the amazing thing is, you fail to provide evidence for your claims every time. and when i provide evidence for mine you ignore it, or like your fellow sycophant utilitarian, outright refuse to even look. the pathetic thing is, you think that is being skeptical, even when the definition has been shown to you.

Evidence? Do you deny initiating the antagonism? Nit picking anything you can find to soothe your bruised ego? There you go. using the word 'sycophant' again, while simultaneously confirming the fact that you are one. And still, not a single experiment or test out of you. Has it ever occured to you that you serve no purpose?

Wilby's entire existence apparently revolves around procuring negative attention. Much like an 8 year old.

[WilbyInebriated]

Evidence? Do you deny initiating the antagonism? Nit picking anything you can find to soothe your bruised ego? There you go. using the word 'sycophant' again, while simultaneously confirming the fact that you are one. And still, not a single experiment or test out of you. Has it ever occured to you that you serve no purpose?

yes evidence, back up your claims with evidence. is there a sign language i can do to help you comprehend that? i deny it completely. please provide some evidence of that claim. mine is not open for discussion tk's is. it's 'occurred'... has it ever 'occurred' to you that when the word turns red you spelled it wrong and it just might be my purpose to tell you that?

much like an 8 year old playing with his 5 year old neighbor whose refuses to admit he was picking his nose when caught red handed, yes.

[TinselKoala]

Here's the biggest most blatant and most manipulative lie on this thread, where the trollbot offers to send me a mosfet if I tell him my address--which, in his trusting innocence, he thinks I did. But it turns out he never intended to send me a transistor, he was only manipulating me into revealing personal information, for who knows what evil troll purpose.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg189752#msg189752

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 06, 2009, 04:04:49 PM

    Well, clearly you have the ability to order your own parts and build your own circuit, since you can use a web catalog. Oh, wait--using the catalog only requires a single finger for typing. Actually building something requires opposable thumbs.

    If you want to buy that from ebay and send it to me, I'll deduct the cost from the bill I send you for the consulting work.

    And the batteries cost "somebody" seventy-six dollars each. But I just had to walk around the building to get them.

    Now, from your elevated pulpit, can you read me the gospel chapter on how the choice of any particular N-channel mosfet would make a likety-split of difference in the duty cycle issue? And why do you care so much anyway? Why don't you go attack her, there are a LOT more holes in her story than you will ever find in mine.
    Zipons! Hah!

well, you clearly have the ability to make BS up on the spot and then misdirect and obfuscate when called on it... i am assuming $4! is still "expensive" for you then? or is it that ebay is as difficult for you to use as google? or do you just like posting outright falsehoods as justification for doing it wrong?

send me your address and i will send you the part, you worthless bum.

building "something" may or may not require opposable thumbs. from your elevated pulpit do let us know when you get around to building it "right"...

I may have made some statements that could be interpreted as being inconsistent. Or not, depending. But Wilby's a liar, plain and simple, and a manipulative, non-creative, one-track one to boot. And the proof is in his own words in the link above.

Oh, did I mention that Wilby is a lying jerk? See above.

[WilbyInebriated]

tk, i'm glad you're here. mh has some contradictions of yours he would like to talk to you about. so we can all move forward. to checkmate. most players usually resign a lost game before being checkmated but tk is slow learner. that's why he dropped out of 5? schools. mh is the only one who knows enough to distance himself from a sinking ship. so for that mh, i was wrong, you are not a blind sycophant, just a sycophant. here is your big chance to show some integrity, don't fail as usual.