Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

The real world?  If you think that strangers on the Internet, to whom you have given nothing but insults, are accountable to you for anything, you are living in a dream world.

i have given nothing but insults? this is simply another one of your baldfaced lies.

i meant the "jack of all trades" as a compliment tk... ie:polymath

more of utilitarian's bullshit. QED

[Harvey]

This was sent to me today in an email from a friend of mine with a PhD who owns M.H. Consulting group in California. It is an interesting test - and given the previous 10 post, it may be appropriate.


 
1. How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?

Stop and think about it and decide on your answer before you scroll down.

























The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe and close the door.
 
This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an overly complicated way.









2 How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?





















Did you say, open the refrigerator, put in the elephant and close the refrigerator?

Wrong answer.

Correct answer:  open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe, put in the elephant and close the door.

This tests your ability to think through the repercussions of your previous actions.
















3. The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All the animals
attend, except one. Which animal does not attend?
























Correct answer:  the Elephant. The elephant is in the refrigerator. You just put him in there.

This tests your memory.

Okay, even if you did not answer the first three questions correctly, you still have one more chance.







4. There is a river you must cross but it is used by crocodiles, and
you do not have a boat. How do you manage it?























Correct answer:  you jump into the river and swim across. Have you not been listening? All the crocodiles are attending the animal meeting.

This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.

According to Anderson Consulting Worldwide, around 90% of the
professionals they tested got all the questions wrong, but many preschoolers got several correct answers.

Anderson Consulting says this conclusively disproves the theory that most professionals have the brain of a four-year-old.

ROFLMAO 

[utilitarian]

i have given nothing but insults? this is simply another one of your baldfaced lies.

more of utilitarian's bullshit. QED

OK, I amend my previous statement to "you have given mostly nothing but insults."  And TK amended his statement to "nearly exact" replication.

But this post of your is a perfect example of your lack of cognitive reasoning skills.  You nitpicked and found an inaccuracy.  But so what?  The inaccuracy is not relevant.  Just because you gave someone a halfway sorta compliment does not raise any kind of responisbility on their part to be accountable to you for anything.

Nobody owes you jack.  You don't like the experiment as described?  Do your own, instead of throwing a tantrum about it.  This is not your project - you did not commission it.  You therefore have zero standing to complain about the way it has been carried out.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Question:

How do you put Wilby in a refrigerator?














Answer:

Say what you mean and mean what you say...and do none of it out of your ass.

An observation...I have noticed that in the jewel thief thread, where there is an absence of boasting and grandstanding, and only the sharing of information...Wilby seems to get along fine with everyone there.

A little advice for all...Wilby has got to be the stickiest tar baby I've seen on the net to date...so, I would avoid taking pokes at him, and just keep things real.

Regards...

[MileHigh]

Aaron and Rosemary:

We are going to discuss what is going on with your circuit and your testing yet again.  If you completely ignore what I say, that's your choice, welcome to the New Dark Age.

Sprocket:

It's a travesty the type of 'infestation' that permeates the Over Unity forum - a board that purports to be striving for FE solutions, yet any promising lines of enquiry are allowed to be completely dominated by paid sceptics! Stefan sold out? I sometimes wonder...

The real travesty Sprocket is that you would consider people around here to be "paid skeptics."  Yet one more time somebody is getting all excited about a discharging inductor.  The high voltage spikes are "magic" and are a source of energy - or not.  Sure, I am a member of the "Anti Spike League" and myself and others are on a mission to suppress all of the free energy discoveries derived from coils that are out there there in the world.  It's a thankless job but somebody has to do it, and the pay sucks.  Sprocket please!

Also, your use of the word "infestation" is positively creepy.  You seem to have your own NWO agenda forming.  Set up concentration camps for scientists and other "non believers" to keep society "clean."  Perhaps for starters a law proclaiming that people of that ilk would only have to wear arm bands would be more acceptable.

Aaron:

A draw down test is needed using the wattage draw that a control supply shows is necessary to produce the same heat as the Anislie circuit at whatever settings.

If 10 watts from control supply to get same temp, then appropriate resistance on control battery to draw exact wattage from full charge down to x voltage is necessary.

And of course Ainslie circuit running at that same temp on full charge battery down to x volts.

Recharge batts and swap batteries and do that back and forth. This will show the truth.

Well this is the same "old school technology" testing that I am sure that you have done many times before.  You don't need the DSO at all to run these tests.  All of this testing should be postponed until you return the DSO.

It's worth noting that you will be making the following comparison:

Control:  Burning equivalent heat of Ainsley coil-resistor only with no other overhead.
Ainsley test:  Burning coil-resistor heat plus overhead heat to run the rest of the circuit.

Under these conditions you can expect the control to run longer than the Ainsley test.  The good thing is that you avoid any requirement to make an accurate electrical power consumption measurement of the Ainsley setup while it is running because you are going the thermal route.  You have to get your coil-resistor off of the wooden board on your desk and hang it in mid air.  If you leave the coil-resistor on the wooden board then your test data will be invalid.

The big unknown is how you are charging the batteries up until they are fully charged.  How are you doing this?  Are you using the "idiot light" on your battery charger?  If yes, do you have any idea how it works?  Alternatively, are you charging the batteries up for a certain amount of time, or to a specific voltage?  How old and what is your estimate of the condition for each of the batteries?

The big question:  Are you expecting the rundown test on the Ainsley setup to last at least 10 times longer than then control rundown?  If the COP is 17 that's what should be happening.  Free energy heat pies are supposed to be appearing like magic.

Now Aaron and Rosemary - are you going to answer the questions above and be open and transparent?

Here is a little thought experiment for both of you:  (A) I ask the questions and you ignore them.  (B) A "good guy" on the Energetic Forum asks exactly the same questions and then you are compelled to answer them.

So, do the two of you have the character required to not make a distinction between (A) and (B)?

MileHigh