Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[poynt99]

Rose,

Based on your last few posts (here and at EF) pertaining to the "negative before positive" stuff, and the capacitors, and Aaron's latest video, I'd say you have both misunderstood what I have been saying about the circuit and internal capacitance and the parts they are playing.

In short, I was not trying to convey that the capacitors used in the 555 circuit are responsible for this effect.

The observed effect of the negative excursion before the positive is due to differentiation of the pulse entering the output section of the 555 chip. I mentioned that this stage is "inverting", and as such needs a "HI to LO" transition to equate to a "LO to HI" transition on pin 3. This HI to LO transition appears at the output as a "below ground" transition due to differentiation of the drive pulse to the output stage.

Once this differentiated pulse exits the 555, it enters the MOSFET Gate pin and is differentiated once more through the MOSFET parasitic capacitance as I outlined in a previous post. The MOSFET is not active in this mode of operation with only hundreds of mV drive on its Gate.

I have not studied Aaron's latest wave forms completely yet, but wanted to mention the misunderstanding before things get too carried away. I'll comment more later once I've had a chance to review the video further.

.99

[poynt99]

Hi,

Although I have no read the 185 pages in this thread, after searching the net for awhile, and unable to find any confirmation, can someone post a link to someone that has confirmed the total energy output in the form of heat is greater than the input supply?

Thanks,
Paul

Paul, I am not aware of anyone confirming this experimentally yet.

.99

[PaulLowrance]

Okay thanks. We've seen the patent via Ainslie's blog site. What country is that patent at because it's not found in a google patent search. Out of curiousity has anyone even verified that this Ainslie Rosemary Ann exists? I can't find a domain she owns, or anyway to verify her, ... or even to verify she's a female. Anything?

How I would test it is by placing the hot components in a small *thermal insulated* oil bath. Mineral oil is commonly used, purchased at local stores. Time how long it takes to heat the insulated oil bath to a certain temperature. Also, data log the battery *DC* current & voltage to calculate the total energy input from battery. Then do the control by placing a load in the oil bath, apply DC voltage, measure DC current, and time how long it takes to heat the oil to the same temperature. And there you go. You know energy output & input.

That would take 1 to 2 days, tops, to verify it.

Regards,
Paul

[PaulLowrance]

Would you agree that's a valid test?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi PaulLowrance.  You ask for a link to confirm the total energy output of the circuit.  Look up the opening page of this.  I think there's more links there.  http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-95.html.

(Hope I've done that right. If not - PLEASE OBLIGE someone, Poynt?)

You'll find reference to an article published on this.  It includes a list of accreditors to the claim.  None of the accreditors have allowed us access to their own reports on the experiment.  All did their own variations of the test on this circuitry.  Thus far none of the contributors to this or to the energetic forum have replicated the results.  But there have been further evidence of gains that, interestingly, point to over unity as opposed to a co-efficiency of performance in excess of anything at all.

Ainslie Rosemary Ann indeed exists.  I can vouch for the fact.  She has a blog spot? Does that help.  And I'm definitely female.

Your thermal insulated 'bath' would only confirm the dissipated heat.  You'll need to relate this to the energy delivered by the supply source.  It's a complicated waveform and probably needs some sophisticated instrumentation to prove values here.

I do hope you'll do the test.  If you do, then you and Poynt will be the only ones on this thread.  TK did take a stab at it but it proved too difficult and he gave up without reaching a conclusion.   

Anyway.  You'll notice that I post under the name witsend.  But most everyone knows me as Rosemary - or Rosie or 'Rose'.  I answer to anything unless it's insulting.