Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

Hi Willby.  Always nice to see you around.  I've copied this in case you're on Poynt's ignore list here as well.  But I think I may soon be joining you there.   

thanks. i'm sure i am on his ignore list here also. you might be, but i wouldn't lose sleep over it.
it's so cute how he gets around to admitting it so much further on down the road though isn't it? with no mea culpa... poynt in fact, that's why i don't care if he ignores me or not, it's no skin off my back and doesn't change the fact that i was correct.

i do wonder why it is taking them so long though, i'd guess it is more complicated than it may seem, at least for them, regardless of what motto poynt chooses.

[allcanadian]

@Harvey
Quote:
"When we sum these events, surely anyone with intelligence will recognize that this begs for an accredited answer as to how this is even possible not to mention why"

If poynt99 or anyone else ever hits the correct frequency they should understand the how and why, the question is will they disclose it. I think good intentions tend to fall by the wayside once people actually succeed.
Regards
AC

[forest]

Pumping balloon  impulses  accumulate but they like to flow out using any hole

[poynt99]

It would seem that my account at EF has been deleted 

Luc et al, any PM's please send here.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

thanks. i'm sure i am on his ignore list here also. you might be, but i wouldn't lose sleep over it.
it's so cute how he gets around to admitting it so much further on down the road though isn't it? with no mea culpa... poynt in fact, that's why i don't care if he ignores me or not, it's no skin off my back and doesn't change the fact that i was correct.

i do wonder why it is taking them so long though, i'd guess it is more complicated than it may seem, at least for them, regardless of what motto poynt chooses.

Wilby - Hi again.   

I"m not at all worried.  There first  has to be some level of intellectual honesty before I invest any real interest in anyone's opinion.  The circuit is really simple.  But like most things that are that elementary - it also seems to go to the heart of the question and this question seems to be rather profound.  But measurement is everything.  What Poynt is telling us - I think - is that we can ignore the measurements applied to this circuit because all such measurements are suspect.  His argument would have been valid if he had ever also submitted unedited raw data for inspection and analysis.   Can't accuse him of this.  Ever. 

At its least - one needs to trust the representations of an experimentalist.  He's stressed this to breaking point.  And having now been broken - then - it's a bit like humpty dumpty.  Not easy to put things together again. 

But I do hope you'll continue to engage in this discussion.  We're hoping to develop this more fully during November and - all things being equal - we may, finally, then be able to get this to the academic table for consideration.  We'll need critical input and I suspect that your own skills here could be invaluable.  As would allcanadian's.   Do hope you're also reading this.  And, for that matter - Cat.  Guys - all of you - we need to cover all reasonable obections as we romp in to the finish line.  If this is going to be an open source first - let's also make it a respectable effort.  I would be sorry to find that we've presented the argument without considering all aspects.   Please do engage in this - as critically as possible.  I think we've more or less covered those points that still need clarification.  But if any of you think of anything at all - it will be much appreciated.

Rosie 

EDIT  And by the way Poynty  - just to remind you.  The dog with the really long tail can rub out his tracks.  But he thereby adds to the scent trail.  Or rather I should say 'stench trail'.  LOL.