Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[PaulLowrance]

You people seem to be working together, each playing a different role. If these endless fakes continues, then don't think for a second that eventually someone will one day investigate such people? Have you ever heard of a PI, Private Investigator? One can be imprisoned for being paid to mislead a lot of people, thus wasting a lot of their life away and their resources? All you can do so far is be dodgy and play games with people.

If you think for a second that you people have shown an experiment that measures the temperature produced by the heated component and then you did the control experiment to see how much power was required to produce that heat then show it. Stop playing games. I looked at the links. It does not exist. Stop playing games and show it.

If you think for a second that you've shown "Rosemary Ainslie" mathematics to prove her theory, then show it.  Stop playing games and show it.

I'm glad that people are finally catching on this attempt at destroying the "free energy" community.

Paul

[poynt99]

Paul,

Please describe what criteria you use to determine if a claim or claimant is a fake or not.

For me, it's quite simple: If the claimant states that their device works a certain way with a certain benefit, knowing full well that it does no such thing in reality, then this person and their claim is indeed a fake.

Otherwise, if it turns out that they are sincere in their beliefs, but adequate replications prove the claims are not valid, then it is simply a matter of the claimant being mistaken due to poor/inadequate measurements and/or mis-interpretation of the measurements and the results, and/or poor understanding of the device's operation.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Poynt.  I also have a critical standard to evaluate sincerity.  And I think you've disqualified yourself from comment.

Aether ever rising and getting ever more technical.

[PaulLowrance]

Please describe what criteria you use to determine if a claim or claimant is a fake or not.

From one of my favorite studies occurring over the past few decades, Human behavioral studies. It's not difficult to test for sincerity, or how dodgy they are. Rosemary Ainslie failed miserably. I also gave mylow a chance. He failed miserably. Everyone ganged up on me. Look what happened. And before that I gave Al a chance. He failed miserably, and everyone ganged up on me as well. Look what happened. ... Hello???

--Derren Brown, Criss Angel, David Blaine

[poynt99]

Paul,

I'd have to say you're the one being dodgy here. I asked you specifically what criteria you use and that's the best you can do?

If you can't do that, then explain why you don't agree with my criteria posted above.

Please abide by your own "rules", or kindly buzz off.

.99