Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

Once again you are blind. I quoted you. Try reading. In our short little discussion you've said nothing, but ambigous statements such as, "what kind of nonsense is this?"   You can't prove it's nonsense. Where's your math, or measurement techniques? Show something so real EE's can get a real laugh.

Still no answer about how to take such measurements, huh. IMO you're a child next to .99, and I say that in all seriousness.

Paul

no i'm not blind. i don't see ANY claims from me, just questions NOT STATEMENTS directed towards you and the merry gang. why do you keep avoiding answering this simple question? it requires a yes or no answer, nothing more pauly...

so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is extremely difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?

[fuzzytomcat]

LOL, you're not worth my time. Still gibberish replies. Take a look at the difference between our posts. I outlined the method to complete .99 posts. All you do is attempt to crap on people, but you only crap on yourself.

fuzzy is a little mind IMO, and rarely deserves responding to. He wants to talk about battery measurements when we're talking about taking complex scope measurements consisting of pulses.

So, you could not answer the question. As expected.  So far .99 is the only person who's come close to completing correct measurements. You people have no clue how to conduct pulse measurements across such components. The inductance is non-linear. The capacitance is non-linear. It's a complex problem that is not taken lightly. That's why the temperature method is the way to go here.

Paul

Just as I thought ..... "NO" documentation ..... "NO" references ..... "NO" intelligence

Sorry but I have to go to Tektronix today and pick up the TDS 3054C for several weeks of further testing and documentation .... and will be making a formal complaint to Stefan on the "SPAMMING" of this thread 

[PaulLowrance]

gibberish? which word did you have trouble understanding pauly?
so you ARE making shit up then. where is my ambiguous claim(s)? i asked you a simple question(s) and you respond with strawmen and ad hom...

one more time then.
so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is extremely difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?

LOL, "ad hom..."   You don't know how to spell it? It's Ad hominem, and it's exactly what you started. Want a few examples? You wrote, "ahh, there is the merry gang of debunkers. hiding in the woods like ticks.."   How about this nice little line from you, "it's cute how you guys feed, off each other even."  Or how about, "what's up ramset? still in touch with tk? do you think you could talk him into leaving his little pity party and coming back for some more debate?"

Paul

[PaulLowrance]

Just as I thought ..... "NO" documentation ..... "NO" references ..... "NO" intelligence

Sorry but I have to go to Tektronix today and pick up the TDS 3054C for several weeks of further testing and documentation .... and will be making a formal complaint to Stefan on the "SPAMMING" of this thread

You're such a ding dong. You prove my point, that such measurements are difficult. I am the one asking you people to show the methods. You can't.

Paul

[WilbyInebriated]

LOL, "ad hom..."   You don't know how to spell it? It's Ad hominem, and it's exactly what you started. Want a few examples? You wrote, "ahh, there is the merry gang of debunkers. hiding in the woods like ticks.."   How about this nice little line from you, "it's cute how you guys feed, off each other even."  Or how about, "what's up ramset? still in touch with tk? do you think you could talk him into leaving his little pity party and coming back for some more debate?"

Paul

paul of course i know how to spell it. if you could read and had followed this thread at all you would have seen me spell it out entirely. but you haven't you are a pauly come lately that thinks they know it all... we have seen more than one of you come and go in this thread.

so i am a bad guy, whaa cry. and then what does that make you? kinda of puts you down on what you consider to be my 'kid' level now doesn't it?

and yet you still have NOT answered this...
so let me make sure i understand you here pauly. the scope stuff is meaningless because it is extremely difficult, UNLESS poynt can prove to you he is a senior EE, in which case the scope stuff then has meaning?