Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[poynt99]

Thanks Grumpy.

Always one able to cut through the BS and get to the meat of the matter 

Oh, and why are you holding back?..tell us how you really feel! LOL!

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Poynty - confusions abound.  Aethertech is, as far as I know, the name of the technical arm of Tektronix in Europe and, I think in Africa.  Hence the extraordinary and compounded confusions between our different references.  When referencing Aethertech I assumed that the technical support division of Tektronix used the same name in the States. 

Regarding the deletions of posts - definitely none apparent.  Again I was looking for the wrong company name.

What can I say?  I'm old and getting ever older and,  apparently - at speed.

Nonetheless - my comments regarding your motives in suggesting the requirement for differential probes and the object of discrediting our data on the basis of this lack - stands.  You have forced this issue and we will need to address it in full.  I'll revisit this later today - your tomorrow - when I can reach Tektronix myself.  When I asked you for a number?  I was referring to Dave's number.

[poynt99]

As it's doubtful my contact with David will continue due to this unfortunate occurrence with Fuzzy's email and the forced uncomfortable position he and Lisa will no doubt be in tomorrow as a result, I'll post his one last bit of advice that says it all anyway, and that is:

These are not trivial measurements and techniques. 

Even with the correct current probes, and differential probes, they require the utmost of care in setup and use.

This is where the "higher standard of measurement" comes in as I have been espousing.

.99

[poynt99]

Nonetheless - my comments regarding your motives in suggesting the requirement for differential probes and the object of discrediting our data on the basis of this lack - stands.  You have forced this issue and we will need to address it in full.  I'll revisit this later today - your tomorrow - when I can reach Aethetech myself.  When I asked you for a number?  I was referring to Dave's number.

First: If you are referring to David McDonald from Tektronix as "Aethertech", please remove that notion from your thinking--he is not "Aethertech"!

Second: If you are intending on contacting David, don't you think your team has done enough damage already? I have not even had a chance to respond to his second email to me and already he is going to suffer a barrage of nonsense emails that will do nothing but worsen the now precarious situation.

Third: It was evidently a mistake on my part thinking I could trust this group to be professional, mindful, and respectful. It won't happen again.

.99

[Grumpy]

Read the first post of "ION".  Also notice that the name is all-caps.

"transient analysis" - Holy Crap!  How many people are even qualified to perform transient analysis?  ION points out that this is not required - thank God!  My point is that he is not some ignorant bystander.  He is skilled in the art.  If you would care to read what he says, you may even consider yourselves in the company of "greatness".  You hardly even noticed his presence...

For the thick-headed:

Engineers have been building power pulse circuits for decades using load resistors and topologies similar to the so called "Ainslie" circuit. Those skilled in the art know that there is nothing novel about the circuit except for the claimed COP. It is strange that no one has observed this effect before (again, if it is real).

And if it is real we should all be heating our homes for less than one cent per equivalent kilowatt hour.(cost here is about 17 cents per kWhr).

The proof of the pudding is in the (h)eating

Probably just an electron transfer mech like in secondary avalanche mode in a transistor.  Increases the goods, but is not OU.