Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 348 Guests are viewing this topic.

scratchrobot

So then the article in that paper is only an example and has nothing to do with it.

Thank you for translation
scratchrobot

a.king21

Kapanadze and earth wire. It is important that we understand the reason for the earth wire. Kapanadze has said that this can be replaced with any heavy object, so his system can power cars for example. At high voltages the electric field exists outside the wire (Steinmetz). As a result a standing wave is set up between the device  - let's say a neon bulb for now - and any earth or virtual earth. A virtual earth is a bowl of water, a coil of wire or a human body which is mostly water etc or a CAR CHASSIS!. Consequently you do not have to physically attach the neon to anything. Simply holding it near to the output will indicate the strength of the field. Alternatively attaching one wire to the output and the other end to earth ground will light the bulb. This is the best way to check for increasing electrical output. The standing wave is AC. So obviously you can bridge rectify it to charge capacitors. In fact this is the basis of one of Utkin's experiments. He additionally screens the output with a parallel plate capacitor to "blind" the device. I've tried it and it works but it doesn't give me enough output to get excited about. Anyway, using this method you can find nodes in your circuitry and obtain power by joining two nodes - as the SAAAR team did in the Lithuania experiments.
What happens is this: Kapanadze's device outputs high voltage. The earth reflects this voltage and a standing wave is created. Because the device is blinded (Utkin) to this voltage Kapanadze can activate circuit B blind to Circuit A. He can then ensure that circuit B is at a higher potential than the start up voltages and a resonant loop is created. In the aquarium video the spark gap is a lightning arrestor. When he disconnects bulbs, the frequency of the spark gap INCREASES, as the system tries to cope with a sudden in rush of power. Towards the end of the aquarium video when he blows a transistor (probably), the spark gap goes BEZERK. Kapanadze wants to keep the device on because the Armani/Gucci dressed over rich potential investors are present. Kapanadze feels the arrestor can cope. His side kick, (probably the circuit man) gets alarmed and urges Kapanadze to switch off to save further components. Once you understand this phenomenon re-watching the aquarium video is a joy. You can predict the speed of the spark gap with each event. The spark gap arrestor also NORMALISES. This means that once the circuit gets used to a new power level it stabilises and the spark gap fires less. This is EXACTLY the same event which was in the Don Smith Tesla symposium suitcase video. So my conclusion is that Don Smith also used a feedback loop. In radio this is called a regenerative receiver. The schematic for this is in Kapanadze's patent. So SAAAR team, this is what you have to do. Power down your flyback till you just get overunity. Then use the increased output to power back into the input via the start up capacitor.(Use Utkin's parallel plate blinding capacitor if necessary) The regenerative process will do the rest. To prevent your components from melting down, you put in a spark gap parallel to the circuitry at the feedback point so it takes the overload and acts as a stabiliser in the circuit. It is actually all in Kapanadze's schematic patent. But remember the resonant output transformer. I hope this introduces some clarity into the Kapanadze system. The start up capacitor is obviously of a high capacity because it takes a couple of seconds to charge it up. The start up battery is a pp3 9 volt at something like 200 ma. So if my calculations are correct it's roughly 2 watts/second per second for 2 seconds IE 4 joules. :)

a.king21

KAPANADZE'S SYSTEM.

To further clarify the point. Kapanadze's system consists of 2 circuits: Circuit A and circuit B. Both are essentially TANK circuits with added components. Circuit A is the start up circuit and powers up the system. Maybe not overunity. Then circuit B kicks in taking BLINDED power from Circuit A. Then the system is looped. You only require a TINY amount of overunity power in circuit B to feed back into circuit A ;and at the speed of electricity the circuit outputs kilowatts in milliseconds. Obviously at this rate it will melt down or explode, so a lightning arrestor (spark gap) is put into the circuit to prevent this event. In radio they use this system (regeneration)to pull in faint signals and they call it a regenerative receiver. The output scope shots in a regenerative receiver are of a rapidly rising wave, similar to the SAAAR team. If you look at the circuit B patent you see that it is earthed. This is also a big clue. That's where the standing wave is set up and "mined" as per Utkin in my opinion. The rest of the circuit is setting up 50 Hz by simply superimposing a 50 Hz signal on top of one of the coils so that mains power can be delivered. That part can be left till later. The important part is to understand the HUGE significance of the regenerative circuit. And of course to remember resonance in both input and output transformers. That means they need a ratio of 1:4 or some denomination of it i.e 1:2, 1:8, 1:16 etc. So wire lengths are important at the outset, and saves a lot of trouble later. The fact that the Kapanadze team can touch the earth wire is also indicative of a standing wave. If the wave was pulling electricity from the ground they could get electrocuted. What would work from this earth point would be an Avramenko plug. Then you could get zapped.

ronotte

Caduceus/coil device UPDATE
It is now some time that I'm playing with that device. Up to now I have not seen a useful output.
During first tries I have used as exciter a standarddimmerable 'neon sign' oscillator able to deliver  more than 10KV at about 40 Khz. Initial results encouraging because the waveform seen similar to that reported by STAAAR team (fig 1): the pic captured in the coil nearing and amplitude about 1KV. Basic sinusoidal signal around 40KHz and discharge rate about 100Hz...the waveform itself similar to 'trumpet' reported by STAAAR team. Well, output load (60W/230V lamp) only very low brightness. My big mistake there has been the interwinding capagitance only 60pf... I increased isolation but... a too high voltage on output provoked oscillator's smoking and puncturing between the Caduceus crossings and output coil...disabling everything.
I did a second and a third attempt re-designing the isolation and reaching at the end an interwinding capacitance of 138pf (near the 140 mentioned by Wesley if I remember well). Measured Caduceus inductance= 38uH and R=0.00Ohm, Output coil inductance=38uH and R=0.15OHm. The overall natural complete device resonance found to be in the MHz range (between 2 and 8 MHz) measured by injectig a small sinusoidal signal from a Wavetek function generator. I tried in every possible way to scale down that resonance to 40KHz range...as expected it has not been possible as any parallel tank cap over 10n behaves poorly (too small L). So at the end the only clever way I have found has been that to tune for the 10 harmonic hence 4 MHz correponding to 3.3n... as wesley showed on his basic design #2 that I also duplicate.
I run the 3rd attempt in a safer way in order do not destroy anything. For this purpose I used as oscillator an LCD power supply able to reach a sinusoidal 2-3KV @40KHz output and having an overall drawn power less than 5W. For SG I use a 1KV arrester. Schematic always that 'basic 2' provided by STAAR team. In this case I have not been able to obtain again the trumpet shaped wave but rather the 'normal' wave (fig 2): you see that basic wave is 40KHz, discharge rate is 500Hz but no trumpet wave as just after the discharge the oscillation decreases instead to increase. The overall operation is better wieved in fig 3 where in the upper trace you see the voltage charging the output cap (before the SG that drives the lamp load). That voltage jump to zero as SG firing (600V). It take 7 steps or 14msec to full charge the output cap. Of course no light in the lamp as only a very sharp discharge pulse goes in the lamp. Wait, I forgot to say that in order to see well what's happening I connected the low side of the lamp and the low side of the oscillator directly to house's ground.
Roberto

ronotte

I'm trying to load the other pics...but the site refuses to accept them...
Roberto