Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 102 Guests are viewing this topic.

ramset

These Boyz seem to think they can open a tanning Spa [incandesant] and an electric soup kitchen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpJDWRLTEXQ&feature=player_embedded

[from underservice.org]

Chet
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

verpies

Quote from: baroutologos on December 30, 2011, 07:40:27 AM
What about electrodes geometry? Makes any difference? example? ...
Are you sure the current you detected is not attributed to the changing magnetic field rather than to captured charged particles?

I remember that the placement of the electrodes mattered (just like in a positive and negative corona discharges) because the positive ions were so massive that they would not get accelerated very much and the electrode catching them had to be close by.
On the other hand, the stripped electrons were light and became significantly accelerated before the gas intercollision time put a cap on the distance that they traveled. Thus the electrode catching the negative charges could be much further away.

I am sure that the current detected could not be attributed to the changing magnetic field because it changed significantly between nitrogen and helium and did not follow the Faraday's Law of induction.

verpies

Quote from: baroutologos on December 30, 2011, 07:40:27 AM
Can you describe your setup? .... What about the non static or moving magnetic field..

The air was ionized with 20kV 16kHz PDC from a TV Flyback transformer driven by the TL494 PWM controller and H-Bridge HEXFET output stage using a fine mesh copper electrodes.
The major difference was the technique used to create the relative velocity between the electric charges and the magnetic field (in the Lorentz force equation F=qV x B)

You used a mechanical air fan, and I used a Lorentz Fan which creates much greater relative velocity and can accelerate even non-moving (static) charges.

Hope

Quote from: ronotte on December 30, 2011, 11:35:06 AM
UPDATE ON MY STAAAR Caduceus device
Remember the famous 'trumpet' like waveform from the many youtube video clips?  Here is my one.
Roberto

That's beautiful!  Excellent!

supersam

verpies,

with this lorenz fan setup is it possible to accelerate the charges to a point of cavitation?  just curious because some have realized excess or annomolous heat from hydrodynamic cavitation.

just curious of your thoughts,
supersam