Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Ghazanfar_Ali]

@Verpies and Wattsup

Dear Friends
I was studying your OU devices schematics along with my 80% successful replication of STAAAR device. I was also scrutinizing data pertaining to Steven Mark's TPU. and after three sleepless nights in my Lab at home I was able to design a circuit which is a mixture of all of your hard efforts and my idea. And I found very interesting results. It is to remember that this device is almost a self running OU device. The only thing which we have to drive with a small power supply is the Pulse Generator and I think 555 Timer will fulfill this need.

Points of Consideration.
1. Frequency is 1KHz pulse with Vmax = 5V to 9 V. (I used minimum values to drive MOSFETs)
2. Duty cycle should be strictly 50%.
3. Rise and fall time of the pulse must be greater than or = 1nsec.
4. 4700uF electrolytic cap should be charged to 24 V DC before starting pulse gen and connecting load.
5. Load must be greater than 150 Ohms. Otherwise it will shutdown the device in a few seconds.
6. 345uH L1 is a ferrite toroid with windings. U have to make L1 using LRC meter.
7. Current drain from 4700uF cap is -9.116mA. From Pulse Gen it is 12.058 uA
8. Output with 150 Ohms load or above, I found so far is 200 V Pulsed DC (1KHz) with 6.4 Amps approx. Hence we got 1200 Watts with an input of 0.06mW.
9. I have tested its simulation so far using National Instruments MultiSim v11. (simulation files are available on demand).

I need your comments if you have suggestion.
I think we r close to a revolution in the field of free energy if we all share our thoughts and efforts.
This device is for all of u to be optimized. But do remember me in your prayers.

Waiting for your comments.
Kind Regards
Ghazanfar Ali
Pakistan

[gyulasun]

Hi Ali,

Would you mind my questions. 

I assume you built this circuit in your lab and I wonder how the 24V DC voltage in capacitor C2 changes, after you start the pulse gen?  How long time does the 24V last in C2 if it starts decreasing?
If you could use an air core coil of 345uH, would the circuit work in the same way?

Thanks for your hard work and time spent.

rgds,  Gyula

Edit: one more thing: why the other two MOSFETs are needed if they are not controlled by their gate? Just their output body diodes are in parallel with that of Q1, is this their intended role?

[wattsup]

@Ghazanfar_Ali

I will need some time to respond but @gyulasun has brought  up some good questions.

@ronotte

Thanks for the heads up on these diodes. I set-up an 110 to 117 AC transformer rated at 1 amp and put a FWBR to get my DC and can get 121vdc. So I put the diode in series with my volt meter to get some readings. To explain this I am using the ">" to indicate the direction of the diode and + and - on each side of this to show how it was connected and the voltage reading.

Diode A

+>- 120.5vdc
->+ 102.1vdc

Diode B

+>- 69.6vdc
->+ 0.037vdc

Sorry for being so numbskullish but HV diodes are not my forté. Hmmmmm. So by the above I would presume my B diode is shot, but what about the A diode? Why am I getting such readings from both sides. Usually one side will provide a reading while the other side will provide none or are HV diodes different?

Since I took off these diodes I connected the flyback HV+ directly to the spark gap that is in series with the Caduceus Coil and the HV- to the Caduceus Output Coil and saw some pretty good sparking but not in the spark gap. It was happening between the inner and outer Caduceus coils as I am showing in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Qttilc7ie8

I think I now know why Wesley was putting some good insulation between the two caduceus coils.

Anyways, I will have to order some more diodes but this time they will be the real ones and also a few HV capacitors would not hurt as well.

wattsup


Added:

In that short video where you see the space between the inner and outer coils, I am thinking that maybe if there was a third coil wound between the inner and outer coils, maybe this is how TK went about it. Put a HV- inside, HV+ outside and a pick up coil in between. Hmmmmmmm again.

[ronotte]

@wattsup
difficult to interpret IF YOU DO NOT PUT IN SERIES A 50K-100K resistor and measure voltage for example across the diode. In such a case if diode is OPEN then you must read 120Volt (diode connected with anode to resistor and in turn to  +PS); if diode is shorted you must read of course near 0Volt.
@all
I feel quite satisfied about my current setup: I am not using any TBC & associated problems...I'm using now a standard Tesla magnifying coil to develop for now a safe low 1500V @ f₀ > 2MHz (He He, much higher than the standard TBC's 16-35KHz!). Roles of the 3 caps used (in wesley suggested basick version #2) is very peculiar/distinctive: for example if you want to increase SG repetition rate you have to decrease the cap on the AV plug...but wait, not below a minimal critical value...
Of course I have now to increase that HV to at least 6KV in order to see an appropriate Trumpet amplitude ...but for before I want to see how to take max advantage from resonating perhaps using some kind of positive feedback: i.e. what suggested by Tesla pat.

Roberto

[Ghazanfar_Ali]

@ Gyula
A good question. I am in process of building this circuit in my lab. This is my initial simulation in NI Multisim. I know unlike LTSpice, Multisim and ORCAD are professional simulators and I always design my schematics before I start deigning the PCBs. Well the circuit is in Oscillation state and 4700uF Capacitor is charged to 24 V DC as an initial charge.The Berkhaussen Criterion is optimally set that u will see the capacitor initially dropping its charge in a few mVs but than back emf from the L1 will keep it charged without any discharging. In other words the rate of discharge = or slightly < than rate of charge for this capacitor so it is acting like a battery which is helping in producing back kick offs from L1 on falling edge of each pulse. Q1 to Q3 are used to provide load sharing and avoid heating up of MOSFETs.
I am sorry for one more thing I wrongly calculated the input and output voltages. In fact Ammeters are set on DC it should be on AC. Then we give  just 5V and 4.3mA to drive the pulse generator and at the output we get 200V with 230mA drain across 150 Ohms load. Thus 45W is the Output and 0.215mW is the Input. I think its not bad.
I have not used Air core L1 its toroidal Ferrite Core. I did not get any simulation errors and I kept its simulation running for 2 hours. 4700uF is not discharging gradually that is a good sign.
Kind Regards
Ghazanfar