Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[stivep]

NYW Group Aidass Arunas Wesley








Pictures for  evaluation have been provided  by Antanas




Wesley

[T-1000]

Ok since a few have asked me about my design I would like to clarify a few things about the box Tesla had in the pierce arrow experiment.

If you want to find out more about N. Tesla Pierce Arrow, you should go back to source closest as possible:
http://ia700302.us.archive.org/16/items/inventionsresear00martiala/inventionsresear00martiala.pdf

The later books got alterated information due lots of rewriting. For example, Tesla hairpin is opposite in books of this day...

Good luck!

[blocki]

@Blacktail:

I found some KP1211EY1A here: http://inter-energo.com/
It's all in Russian, and my Russian is not a 10
I have send them a mail, I don't know if they will deliver abroad, at the moment I live in Belgium.

@Starcruiser,

The schematic make sense, with the loop-back and all, that's the reason I want to know if there is somebody working with this schematic.
The difficulty is of course the construction of the 'Kapanadze Coil' to get the desired resonance.


--- Keep Fighting For Free Energy ---

[Khwartz]

..../....

We do not know what  gain of energy is coming from
We do not know why TK device work without any external power supply.

By the fact of applying different schematics and gaining results we have a chance to
-compare them
- analyze similarities
-mark differentiates
-get to logic conclusions


There is no one way to Washington
There are plenty.
There is no one OU device concepts
There are plenty.


There are many ways but only one unique mechanism ruling coupling energy of steady state Tesla based devices that is  common to all group of Tesla based devices

We try to find that mechanism
that  is why we have so many approaches


There is no magic device. It is only device that we do not understand why it works.



One of the main focuses of mine is spark gap by itself.That is why I try to attract    the group with new approach
Arunas than is taking concept into the drowing table
Than group together is scrutinizing the the schematic made by Arunas.

Hi Wesley! that is the good way :-bd

My Letter to John my friend from scientifically oriented group  of traditional science
who is supporting that all and closely watching group progress.




From Wesley to John


"The large time jitter originates from the stochastic processes
that cause the actual breakdown of the spark gap: When an electric field is applied over
a gap, at some point in time a free electron will be created (due to (cosmic) background
radiation). This free electron is accelerated by the applied electric field, gains energy and,
eventually, hits an atom. When the energy of the accelerated electron is high enough,
this atom will be ionized and another free electron is created. The two electrons will be
accelerated again, additional ionization will take place and this way an electron avalanche
in created. Finally, via this avalanche and the additional process of streamer formation a
conducting (arc) channel will be formed, spanning the complete gap between the electrodes
(a streamer is a narrow filamentary plasma, driven by highly non-linear space charge waves
This breakdown process is a stochastic process. The creation of the first free electrons
is stochastic and also the electron avalanche-formation has a stochastic nature, causing the
large shot-to-shot time instability and also limiting the rise time of the switched pulse





Theory of how TK device works. 


Take spark gap that is made from two contacts and is placed in our example  horizontally

Lets say that :Spark is jumping from left to right
Lets assume that when cosmic ray strike an electron it ads to total  energy by coupling energy of an electron.

This is what I've called otherwhere: "Venturi Pumping Like Effect" 

Lets say that after all of the losses we are still dealing with little more additive energy level at the right side of the spark gap than we delivered to the left hand side.
Lets say that we  tuned spark gap to its own self resonance frequency
Lets say that in spectral view, there is certain significant presence of amplitude level that represents mentioned above occupying narrow bandwidth. That would manifest  self resonance frequency of a spark gap.   




The theory of mine is
- that in spark gap we are dealing with slow down of transition of energy ,that has addition of cosmic rays  than we try to deliver summary of the charge  after spark jumps back to the left hand side of spark gap.
Despite the losses  energy return is faster than energy transfer  at the spark gap.
-difference in speed travel of electrons in plasma and in copper.
Now we dealing with self-looping circuitry.
Each loop time period gives us more energy going to infinite number up.
Infinite number is energy without limitation but chopped by spark gap self resonance frequency
Right before  very maximum of the amplitude of the signal  from  right  hand side of spark gap
the impulse is than  caught   part of the access energy is delivered to the load ( light bulb)
The rest of the signal  is returned to the left hand side of spark gap
That rest  of the signal = energy needed to sustain oscillation.


The trumpet waveform is significant  to energy grow on the right hand side of spark gap.
If there was  element of device that could allow to do not interrupt trumpet that energy will grow infinitely .
That is the spark gap plasma transition delta T that is interrupting trumpet   

The frequency of oscillation is tuned to frequency of spark gap by itself.



For one who may analyze energy level of the cosmic ray as additive:
-Does not matter what is energy of cosmic ray as we do not know how many cosmic rays and at what interval i time  is striking electron / plasma of spark gap
example.
water is flowing into a container at steady speed= delta T
with the time,  potential energy in the container is accumulated 
I once released it represents say 100% of energy accumulated  from the water flow.
( minus energy losses due to the friction)
But we utilize only part of that  energy for our needs.

Looks to me that could be good idea to multiply the width of the spikes, like having kind of plasmic -surface that could catch more cosmic-rays.

and we have constant water  flowing into a container at steady speed= delta T  all the time any time.
The speed of that flow is the factor determining potential energy level in container
The faster the speed  of flow the faster  container gain its potential energy.


Lets take this to three-dimensional  geometrical  platform
once electrical filed, and magnetically created field  expands more surface is available for cosmic ray to strike and add energy to energy of  plasma.


And lets assume that  cosmic ray energy is in phase  and reacts as pure additive to overall energy level.

conclusion #1


There is conservation of energy laws obeyed
There is only mechanism of ENERGY COUPLING PROCESS
That energy is free of charge by oil guys.



conclusion # 2
what ever mechanism or theory we take to analyze what this energy  is coming from
energy is coming from somewhere and is utilized by TK device or any device that uses the same mechanism.


final conclusion= summary of conclusions
there are many concepts but only  one mechanism of coupling.


As Dick said Spark gap does not care about signal carried on (say radar TX signal)
Spark gap works with its own frequency.


Frequency of radar transmitter is 3-9GHz
Frequency of spark gap is say 20 khz
So transmitter  of radar must send burst of the signal of 3 to 9 GHz that  has a length of burst matching spark gap frequency of switching
In between of intervals when transmitter is OFF the receiver input is not shorted by spark and using the same antenna  of radar
That signal goes from antenna to receiver of radar till the next spark jumps shorting receiver again. 
Receiver is receiving signal reflected from objects.


We have noticed that based on geometry of spark gap, with the same power supply- generator  we have soft spark or violent spark


Wesley


PS: pictures attached show geometry of spark gap tube only for one particular group of spark gaps
This one gives  nice soft spark .
The tubes pictured have addition of vacuum that in my opinion  makes it less vulnerable to atmospheric impurities

Wesley, ionisation can only occur with presence of atoms in the environement of the SG. If total vacum, it's something else that happened, as I could see.
In FLC light bulbs, we use that to start the light and then, while ionisation is made, it runs with less need of power.
So, we chose specific inert gas to maximize the lighting, like we could chose type of gas too for maximizing the pumping effect.
But I think that what John said doesn't apply in vacuum and could be essentially ZPE "Venturi Pumping Like Effect". What do you think?

[stivep]

Hi Wesley! that is the good way :-bd

This is what I've called otherwhere: "Venturi Pumping Like Effect" 
Looks to me that could be good idea to multiply the width of the spikes, like having kind of plasmic -surface that could catch more cosmic-rays.

Wesley, ionisation can only occur with presence of atoms in the environement of the SG. If total vacum, it's something else that happened, as I could see.
In FLC light bulbs, we use that to start the light and then, while ionisation is made, it runs with less need of power.
So, we chose specific inert gas to maximize the lighting, like we could chose type of gas too for maximizing the pumping effect.
But I think that what John said doesn't apply in vacuum and could be essentially ZPE "Venturi Pumping Like Effect". What do you think?

Interesting approach. Definitely we dealing with  pumping effect
The problem I might have is gas or vacuum . TK did not used any vacuum and any gas
violence of spark gap depends on geometry of spark gap.
I have one vacuum tube that has flat discs 1.4" diameter and it works like a charm.
I have noticed that  TK utilized thick wire  with flat service in all of  his devices.


Wesley