Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[John M]

- Caduceus inductance @1KHz  L = 0.3uH (!!)
- Caduceus resistance @1KHz   R = 0.0 Ohm

Driving the Caduceus (Wavetek sin generator Z0=50 Ohm) with 1K resistor in series gives no resonance till at least the 20MHz Wavetek capability. Putting the Caduceus in the operating mode by inserting the Ferrite rods (4stick  x 0.9cm x 20cm) and using a tank cap = 800pf gives a perfect resonance at 3.54MHz. This is not coherent if using any TBC as source  but make sense if referred for example to my kacher tailored (1/4 wave) to work at 3.1MHz.





Roberto - Good information on your post. The Caduceus will have some inductance including lead wires, and it does increase with addition of the Ferrite. A Ferrite Rod by itself  will have inductance across it which also varies with the frequency applied.  It seems to me that we may be dealing with a Ferroresonce effect on the replications which is notable when the ferrite starts to audibly vibrate if the frequency is low enough frequency. I thought that in some replications this was noticeable. In this effect there is a point at which the frequency reaches its highest point where the ouput suddenly drops. I don't know if anyone has experienced this with their replication. This is just my opinion for what its worth.
John

[ronotte]

@John,
yes, my system using kacher DOES generate often strong mechanical vibrations from Ferrites (200Hz - 5KHz range) either inside the Caduceus OR also inside the kacher itself. WHEN THAT HAPPENS THERE IS A STRONG INCREASE OF OUTPUT 1KV SPIKES REPETITION RATE. I generally avoid to maintain that condition fearing bad consequences

@watsup,
"Maybe on your Katcher coil, consider adding a third coil over the mini-Tesla coil. Maybe a little thicker wire and at least 20 turns with a tap at every 5 turns would give you Open-5T-tap1-5T-tap2-5T-tap3-5T-Open. Then put your HV- from the mini-Tesla to the open end of the 20T and put the other side of that to your CC center tap. Then add a small capacitor on Tap 1 and 2 or 2 and 3. You will have to try it from each side of the new coil to see which is the best polarity match. Then add a ferrite core in the center of the Katcher and see what happens. That would be a quick way for Katchers to test the TBC110 set-up."

I am actually working in a way different from what you suggested. Anyway that's an interesting TBC's simulation so I'm going to implement it. Thanks.

P.S. why don't you go for a simple kacher solution? This could allow to confront directly the results.

Roberto   

[aether22]

Roberto, great results!


I think one important thing is to test what is happening when you get the concave divergent trumpet.
Is the Caduceus coil tank circuit (which I now understand IS resonant at or about the ramp frequency with ferrite and cap) oscillating actively with current?


This is an important question, the other possibility is that it is just a static capacitive reading.


So if it is a circulating current, then it will be easy to show this with a pickup coil, the orientation of this pickup coil would change magnetic inductance but not electric field capacitance.
numbers of turns and electrostatic shielding can also be employed to further discriminate between the 2 possibilities.


Wattsup: For what it's worth (I don't know your belief system) the extra coil on the flyback can be doing 2 things, first the aether is moved by currents through time varying coils and by electric fields, if you have 2 different waves of aether collide (from 2 coils) you create an energized condition in the aether, that could be happening here. This is how the Hutchison effect works.  Secondly I believe under the right conditions for electromagnetic fields to couple from one part of a circuit to another with little concern for distance and those extra coils might create flux better able to project.

[baroutologos]

Hi Ghazanfar_Ali,

how do you do the feedback circuit to run it
just on a charged capacitor ?
...
Regards, Stefan.

I think, he subtly implied, that the initially charged capacitor is not obvious discharged and lasted a week, rather than oscillates the current back and forth towards the LC component (which in turn kicks it back by some means), somehow skyrocketing the voltage (when mosfets closed),  while a tiny current pass through the inc. lamp thus (in theory) producing power.

Bear in mind stefan, hypothetically such a OU system as depicted has its amp meters showing AC high frequency current and of weird wave shapes rather than DC. If you just sum all currents you would see the current that oscillates back and forth through MOSFETs ( stage 1 through drain, stage 2 through diode -reversed-) and bulb is equal to initial capacitor's thus the law of charge preservation is not violated.
What remains to be seen is the violation of law of Energy In = out... interesting and amusing go on...

[T-1000]

@ronotte the diagram you got obviosly has not full connections in ТÐ'С-110ЛА
The attached diagram has correct version.
Due much concerns about ТÐ'С-110ЛА, I need you to pay attention about it having LC resonant circuit attached in series to "cold" HV coil end. This is where you get exciter/katcher functionality.

Mr. N. Tesla always had two stages of power amplification:
1) In the step up transformer
2) In his Tesla Coil.

@watssup
ТÐ'С-110ЛА is not a must and any step up transformer with resonant LC circuit(on natual frequency or its harmonics) would do the job.

The one thing different from comventional approach is - we use Tesla coil primary/secondary interwindings stray capacitance as output for HV transformer. This is where you get load not affecting input.

P.S> It is good to see trumpet wave replicated, now the hardest bit is left... The energy harvesting without killing resonant circuit oscillations

Good luck!