Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[stivep]

Hi Wesley,

as you have visited Kapanadze and saw his 200 Watt device, I take your message seriously.

So you think this motor is a fake powered by batteries hidden in the Ibeam bottom ?

At minute 3:00 there you can see the wire coming from the external generator going back to the motor unit control panel
at the front where he switches to selfrunning mode, so the cable is no mystery !
It is just the output cable from the generator working as the positive feedback cable.

I agree with you, that the underside of the disc are probably going through the case floor and it might be
possible that there are motor(s) hidden,that propell the discs this way by touching their rim...


SO do you knowm for sure that these motor videos are fake ?


But the simple coil video from the 28th of April 2004 is genuine , right ?

How should he have hidden there a big battery ? There is no way to do this.

Also the other 50 to 100 KWatts models are not able to fake at this high output wattage...

Regards, Stefan.
P.S: CosmoLV, you are claiming it is a total new weird effect, so do you know Kapanadze personally
and can you shed some more light on it ?
If you know the pronciple, then why don´t you tell it to us ?

You put everything into one  bucket.
First Faraday concept of motor was not eliminated.
Second  i did not say that there is hidden motor but  ...elevated supports of shaft with two discs from the side facing discs have non metallic and/or non-electromagnetic  shield properties
That allowed penetration of magnetic flux towards the discs.   
in another video I said magnetic flux penetration is possibly  done  by the part of flor painted to imitate metal..
Concept of
Homopolar generator  known as Faraday disc  in multiform ( dual disc) is no disqualified.
In video from German side
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3thvqFhFIfY
we are dealing with floor made of dual T enough space to hide bank of battery 40 of them minimum. 14V10AH
look at my post with pictures... you will see comment on  this picture.


In video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVUN3GsekKQ
You see big box to the left ( the one with wire coming out.
That might be huge bank of battery
Again Faraday  disc is not disqualified


BUT TORID IS NOT TORQUE MECHANISM AT ALL.
TOROID MIGHT BE DOING NOTHING OR JUST SYNCHRONIZED PULSE READING MECHANISM 
READING MAGNETIC FIELD OF SMALL MAGNET EMBEDDED TO THE SHAFT


Please read  my previous post carefully.




Wesley

[andrea76]

this type of motor is similar to hendershot motor first device.work only when put i tin N/S direction.the toroidal coil is drived by the circuit inside the box (starting with pulse direct current at CORRECT frequency).the pulse is received to the coil wrapped around the shaft.because the shaft is blocked to the two brass plate,the shaft rotated.if you build the second coil out the shaft you have the solid stated device.study the hendershot unit......

[hexoda]

Kapanadze 28th April 2004 fuull version, 28 minutes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r99g4mjEvTE

[verpies]

I would agree on the lux reading.  Only problem I see with it would be the heat buildup (it need to be either a small bulb or large enclosure).  With a temp gun,  you could measure the load device surface heat in the open air and also take a measurement of the ambient air temperature under both source conditions.  I thought of this because so many people have these lying around.

Surface heat measurement is OK if it is not influenced by the ambient light.
The air temperature is the major error factor because it affects the light sensors, but even without compensating for it, the power measurement error is below 5%. Much much better than blindly multiplying Volts and Amps for non-DC arbitrary waveforms.

The bulb-in-a-box method is in good agreement with commercial wattmeters. See:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/kapagen/kapagen33pio.htm

It makes little difference whether a luxmeter or a photodiode or solar cell is used.  All are monotonic (unlike automatic video cameras)

[verpies]

Unfortunately, incandescence of a bulb is a affected by the applied frequency. So bulb brightness isn't telling you anything conclusive about OU power being generated. The fact that a high frequency output can light 100w bulbs does not mean 100w was used to light it. If you're stepping the frequency back down to 60hz, that would be apples to apples. Otherwise you're misleading yourself.

Up to 50MHz the skin effect error contribution is under 1% for thin non-coiled filaments.
Filtering-out the high frequency components is not an option because such action would destroy the resistive nature of the incandescent load and this would introduce huge errors.

P.S
Why 60Hz if DC is theoretically optimal