Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[twinbeard]

Without resistance (somewhere) you cannot light a globe (if there is no resistance the fialment wont heat up)
Cold electricity is a phenomenon that has only a few uses
Talk of lenzless generators is stupidity (I repeat...without Lenz and resistance you cant do useful work)  Wake up!!
All you can do is recycle
Losses are everywhere...heat, light, magnetic, electric, gravitic


Anyway whatever.

I am going to take you to task on the Lenz.  If you phase modulate the field created in the generator coil such that the current does not appear until the exciting pole has already passed, then you can not only negate the Lenz related drag, but you can invert the effect so that you actually get higher frequency of rotation with less prime mover input.

I could expound upon other mentioned topics, but apparently you came to tell us what farking morons we are, so cast not pearls before swine, and all that. 

[teslabuilder]

Well done John.

One of the very few posts of intellect in this whole nonsensical thread.

I too spent 18 months methodically 'perfecting' a circuit that I would call a solid state tesla switch.  It is a thing of pure beauty.  After reading all of teslas patents, studing the works of Don Smith, I was able to build an 'amplifier' that gives the the illusion of OU.

Input 2 watts
Loaded output 4 watts.

The more load you apply the LESS the circuit uses! 

BTW, before anyone gets pedantic about my numbers let me clarify -

Obviously if it were REALLY 4 watts out and 2 watts in it would be able to self run.  I already stated it does not.

the 2 watts input is REAL value.
4 watts output was the READING from the scopes and various meters HOWEVER...as you should all know if you truly build...Tesla tech is all about sharp on/off switching with decaying resonance.  Meters are fooled by the massive voltage spikes and cannot keep up with accurate averaging.  Modern meters are meant for reading slow sine wave and even the best RMS gets bamboozled by the Mhz high freq tesla switching.

The reality is this.  By honest experiments with batteries and capacitors at both the input and output, I was able to calculate the input at 2 watts and the output about 1.96 watts.

The very specific waveform that this setup generates is something lead batteries love...you can charge a 12volt battery to 18 volts or higher on only 12 volt input.  When you cease charging it settles back to about 13.5 volts.  The charge is very real and very dense.  The batteries never sulphate and the run time on them is huge.

Another thing you will see is that this charger will automatically adjust to different battery capacitances.  whether 6 volt, series, 12 volt, whatever.  Additionally, this being the case it makes an excellent HHO generator.

You can light 15 watt rated led lights with the circuit and fool urself with that but this is not accurate as you may one day find out if you experiment rather than drivel nonsense.  You can also light 6 watt bulbs (filament) and the draw on the input goes down because of factors I wont discuss here.  Its all part of the makeup of circuit and when you see it for what it is...you understand why and how it works.

Sadly it is not OU...but it does have plenty of uses.

Tariel has no OU and neither did Don Smith.  Rosemary Ainslie, I will say has no OU either.  If she was honest with it rather than being in love with the circuit, she would be able to see that there is no OU even with all the silly heat output statements.

[teslabuilder]

I am going to take you to task on the Lenz.  If you phase modulate the field created in the generator coil such that the current does not appear until the exciting pole has already passed, then you can not only negate the Lenz related drag, but you can invert the effect so that you actually get higher frequency of rotation with less prime mover input.

I could expound upon other mentioned topics, but apparently you came to tell us what farking morons we are, so cast not pearls before swine, and all that.

I am aware of that.

At the end of it all, what you just stated is wanky.  My circuit wouldnt have less draw on input when loaded down if I didnt understand what you were stating.  But be that what it is ...it just doesnt matter.

Whether you try and lift a 1 ton rock with ur bare hands (and break ur back) or whether you decide to use a block and tackle for 2 days ...it all equates to METHOD of shuttling energy.  Either be efficient...or dont be efficient.  However, you have still expended a certain amount of energy and you wont get it all back.

So when you have settled down and got your knickers out of a twist, look at it honestly.

I just dont give a crap

[frantz]

Update of mustafa device:

[twinbeard]

I am going to take you to task on the Lenz.  If you phase modulate the field created in the generator coil such that the current does not appear until the exciting pole has already passed, then you can not only negate the Lenz related drag, but you can invert the effect so that you actually get higher frequency of rotation with less prime mover input.

I am aware of that.

Then why would you say this?

Talk of lenzless generators is stupidity

Its plainly not.  You just agreed with a technique I described to achieve it.

At the end of it all, what you just stated is wanky.

Well, to be fair, what you just said is either a)hypocritical or b) male bovine feces.

My circuit wouldnt have less draw on input when loaded down if I didnt understand what you were stating.  But be that what it is ...it just doesnt matter.

Perhaps, perhaps not.  depends on your load, and if your load is going to effect the Q of your circuit.

Whether you try and lift a 1 ton rock with ur bare hands (and break ur back) or whether you decide to use a block and tackle for 2 days ...it all equates to METHOD of shuttling energy. 

I would rather do it like Leedskalnin did it in the middle of the night.

Either be efficient...or dont be efficient.  However, you have still expended a certain amount of energy and you wont get it all back.

This is true.  Efficiency in loads is an excellent engineering goal, for sure.  Doing just that is what keeps me in the particular business that I am in, but that is irrelevant.  The less loss in your circuits, the better all around.  But what if you set up your circuit to create a condition that allows nature to give you some energy for free?  Maybe it gives you more than you expended in the process, plus what your circuit recycled once it was done with it?

So when you have settled down and got your knickers out of a twist, look at it honestly.

I do look at it honestly.  Watch the clear box video.  Maybe the 9V runs a small oscillator that tops off a cap till the potential is high enough to start the main device.  The device then runs with no obvious external input... just an earth connection.  Either that is a receiver circuit for a soviet magnifying transmitter, or it is a permutation of the transmitter itself, plasma arc reactor included, that tops off its own drive cap with part of the output.

I just dont give a crap

Good.  If I wanted any crap out of you, I would just squeeze your head.

Cheers,
Twinbeard