Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 181 Guests are viewing this topic.

jbignes5


Tesla: " The advantage of this apparatus was the delivering of energy at short intervals whereby one could increase activity, and with this scheme I was able to perform all of those wonderful experiments which have been reprinted from time to time in the technical papers.  I would take energy out of a circuit at rates of hundreds or thousands of horsepower.  In Colorado, I reached 18 million horsepower activities, but that was always by this device: Energy stored in the condenser and discharged in an inconceivably small interval of time.  You could not produce that activity with an undamped wave.  The damped wave is of advantage because it gives you, with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, or 5,000 kilowatts; whereas, if you have a continuous or undamped wave, 1 kilowatt gives you only wave energy at the rate of 1 kilowatt and nothing more.  That is the reason why the system with a quenched gap has become popular.[/font][/size]I have refined this so that I have been able to take energy out of engines by drawing on their momentum.  For instance, if the engine is of 200 horsepower, I take the energy out for a minute interval of time, at a rate of 5,000 or 6,000 horsepower, then I store [it] in a condenser and discharge the same at the rate of several millions of horsepower.  That is how these wonderful effects are produced.  The condenser is the most wonderful instrument, as I have stated in my writings, because it enables us to attain greater activities than are practical with explosives.  There is no limit to the energy which you can develop with a condenser.  There is a limit to the energy which you can develop with an explosive.[/size]
A common experiment, for instance, in my laboratory on Houston Street, was to pass through a coil energy at a rate of several thousand horsepower, put a piece of thick tinfoil on a stick, and approach it to that coil.  The tinfoil would melt, and would not only melt, but while it was still in that form, it would be evaporated and the whole process took place in so small an interval of time that it was like a cannon shot.  Instantly I put it there, there was an explosion.  That was a striking experiment.  It simply showed the power of the condenser, and at that time I was so reckless that in order to demonstrate to my visitors that my theories were correct, I would stick my head into that coil and I was not hurt; but, I would not do it now."

Capacitors are the workhorse Tesla used! They are the shooting mechanism he used. The trigger was the quenched spark gap. Without these two devices no system could put out more then what you put in.


So the condenser is the force provider with the quenched spark gap being the activator. The target is the primary of the second coil. The fist coil is only used to get to higher voltages to fill the condenser. If you shoot the charged condenser into the primary of the second transformer you can take out huge amounts of energy. But I am thinking the second transformer must be setup in the right manner to allow for run away. This runaway is needed to generate the power one wanted out of the second circuit or transformer.

What I am thinking is that Tesla found a way to harness this explosive power of the condenser. He devised a way to allow his system to pull in whatever it needed and to harness it to whatever device he wanted including Motors eventually with appropriate cooling from the increased heat produced in the process.
Tesla's special transformers (Toroids) were almost exclusively used in this process but special attention had to be paid attention to heating of the iron within the core.
This was also evident from the fan he adopted to his pierce arrow experiment. What I think he did was design a way to harness this high voltage burst to pass through the atmosphere between to antennas (one small and one large(focusing)) then into specially designed toroid transformer that was around a core. The ratio of copper wire was resonant or equal but the gauges were different. The outside being very small and the inner(armature) being very very thick. This did two things: One it stepped down the voltages into very high currents and two it kept the high current at bay. The huge magnetic fields would have been reflected back inwards from the inductive action going from the armature to the field coils. In the motor design he used the toroids acted in two ways: one of a lock on mechanism to create a synchronous of the armature and toroid and the second it created a shielding effect of the currents being transformed in the armature. Tesla also talked about shorting the armature at the peek of the up-slope of the pulses picked up in the armature. Why I don't know but that gives credence to the report his nephew made. The tubes are used for that purpose and are only employed after the armature coils. Tubes=very high current capability.
References:
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/nt_on_ac.htm#034
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/teslcar.htm


The major problem I see with the report is that everyone assumes it was from the power transmission. This is in error seeing that he has patents which include a self excited generator with included prime mover. If he could extract 5-10 times the input from the disruptive condenser discharges then he didn't need transmissions at all. The only thing he would need would be the initial surge to start the process then everything else would self resolve. Including replacing the energy needed to kick start the process. Yes he had antennas he used in the process but those were for concentrating(intensifying) and harvesting the gains he needed to run the prime mover. This was evident from the fan he had to use on the prime mover(transformer).

Further revelations from Tesla:

"What sort of apparatus was it connected up to for the purpose of absorbing these waves?

Tesla

It was the same as shown here [Fig. 38].  It was connected to the condensers, and these condensers were discharged through a primary which excited the secondary; the antenna was included in the secondary.  At other times we discharged the condensers directly so that I could use the antenna without the secondary.

Counsel

In the same way did you note the operation of these waves?

Tesla

We did, of course, only in most cases the instrument of reception was different.  When I operated with these continuous, or undamped, waves, generated in this way, I usually went to high frequencies.  I did operate [at] a very few thousand, but that gave me a smaller output.  Such a machine you have to operate at high frequencies to get power.

Counsel

What do you mean by high frequencies?

Tesla

I mean frequencies of 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, or something like that."

wattsup

@ronotte

Thanks for replying to my PMs. As you know I have blown one of my FGs as well as two DC power supplies, a volt meter and endless mosfets and I am really getting scared of blowing any more equipment.

As per your suggestion I took a look again at the ECD circuit which I am posting below.

I have built and tried the circuit but cannot see anything really so I think I am making some mistake.

First off, the IRF7307 I had already purchased when @verpies recommended it but because it was so damn small (SO-8) I was afraid fo trying to solder such a small component. Well this weekend I decided to try it again and have succeeded after great hassles.

What is confusing to me is that your circuit is showing the positive of the supply side going through the source drain when the IRF840 is an N-Channel. Is it possible that your circuit is wrong. I built it exactly like it is shown with the caps and 10k resistor but it does not work. Also on your circuit, it is not clear is the pulse generate signal negative is also connected. Also the power supply negative is going to the mobius loop shield but Terminal 4 of TB-1 is going nowhere. Maybe I am looking at the wrong circuit diagram.

If you have a circuit like this, can you please take a picture of it and post it so I can see where I am going wrong.

If this can work, then I would not have to always work in fear of losing more and more equipment which is definitely not cheap.

Anyways, I put up a photo of my circuit close up and a far shot to show how I am using it. Because I want to have a good pulsing component for the flyback return form the primary of the FBT, I am doing the following.

Pulse generater to
ECD circuit to
Toroid coil with bucking mode primary and series secondary to
Primary of FBT.

I want the toroid to drive the flyback primary as I have future plans for such a toroid once things can get working.

@woopy

I just love your last video man. That is just great and you are definitely onto something so please keep at it.

@stivep

Incredible coil winders. My wife and I usually drive down to New York in the summer for a few days so maybe we can meet. I would love to see your shop. That toroidal winder is so nice and I have two nice cores to test with a possible wind method. hehe.

I would like to eventually get a toroid winder and so so many builds. My son just purchased his first home so he will be moving out end of sprng and this will enable me to expand my office space. Then I will look for one. hehehe.

wattsup


jbignes5

@wattsup


Have you tried the mag amp I referred to earlier?


http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/magnetic%20amplifiers.pdf


This is a book written by the US Navy. It shows all the types of mag amps back from the 50's. Give it a look see and you'll see that you don't need to buy expensive parts. You can just build it with common parts. If you read into the book it will show you all the different types of mag amps and how you can make them with all kinds of feedback and controls to get what you need. Mag amps are very very tough and robust and even have great efficiency as well...

ronotte

 Hi wattsup,

I do understand you frustration about choosing the correct circuit for driving such huge flyback.  So, lets go with order:

1. My mosfet circuit driver’s correct. I used many of them without any failure (I even did PCB for them), simply the ECD's coil is driven from TB1-1 to +Voltage.  Mosfet’s gnd  is connected to TB1-6. Basically is a simple low-side switch driven by a proper complementary driver and input opt isolator. Nothing to discover. Just pay attention to floating voltages needed in order to isolate the components. Perhaps you get confused by the many wiring in my complete ECD schematic (pse see my easier pulser only pic). Anyway such circuit’s tailored to drive ECD’s coil hence NOT good for flybacks that need special approach (as you know very well). Mainly you can chose between a single transistor oscillator or the much better push-pull approach.

2. Push-pull approach. As probably you are aware there are many possibilities using either JBT of mosfet. Generally I prefer to use mosfets mainly because they are more efficient and…I’ve lot of them. One of the best & easier  circuit in my opinion has been shown by WNG’s group (see attached detail): here there’s a main oscillator with frequency & duty cycle control (good for experimenting…without destroying costly prof oscillators) using a TL494 IC. Such device provide two separated complementary outputs just good to properly drive  the two TC4422 mosfet’s drivers. In turn the latter drive in contro-phase the two IRFP460 (or the like) power mosfets. All the material is low cost and total assembly time on a small board is quick. TC4422 probably need a small heath sink while the final IRFP640 do need a bigger heath sink. All the design, you see could be floating and use a small  12V battery. Final mosfet’s supply is from CT (pin 1): here you could supply DC voltages from 12V to about 1/3 of max allowed final mosfet Vd...of course you have also to put a strong decoupling circuit. Safety zener (or the like) protection could be placed between each drain and GND. Same is possible to protect Gates: just a small 15V zener to GND.

If you have any question do not hesitate to contact me.
Ciao
Roberto

Shokac

This is elektromagnetic field of external Kapanadze coil.

Inner coil (Grid coil) have smoler electromagnetic field.
Kapanadze inner electromagnetic field increases with external coil and increases curent in Grid coil.

Only the fields must match the frequency to get the effect of increasing current.

Whoever finds a way to automatically adjust the frequency of the external solenoid with Grid frequencies that would reveal the secret Kapanadze.

But to think it is very simple and using only capacitors, diodes and spark