Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

Why don't we ignore the reality?


http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/Solenoid_magnetic_field.jpg


Why is it most only see the Magnetic spectrum and ignore the electric field? They both exist at the same time do they not? Kapanadze is using high voltage and that means the electric field is the strongest of the two fields.


No one wants to read and learn I guess. They have their minds set already as to the process and this is why they are failing! Yes diodes, spark gaps and capacitors can be used only in this process. It is that simple, plain and simple.

Condensers(capacitors):
"I have refined this so that I have been able to take energy out of engines by drawing on their momentum.  For instance, if the engine is of 200 horsepower, I take the energy out for a minute interval of time, at a rate of 5,000 or 6,000 horsepower, then I store [it] in a condenser and discharge the same at the rate of several millions of horsepower.  That is how these wonderful effects are produced.  The condenser is the most wonderful instrument, as I have stated in my writings, because it enables us to attain greater activities than are practical with explosives.  There is no limit to the energy which you can develop with a condenser.  There is a limit to the energy which you can develop with an explosive."

"The method was this: I had a 550-volt current with which I charged the condensers.  These condensers I discharged through a primary in the form of an arc, sometimes I also introduced in this arc a mechanical break of several thousand per second.  And I obtained a perfectly continuous train of waves as has been described in my patents.  The reason why I show the condenser here [Fig. 83] is that that is synonymous with undamped waves.  If I had shown the whole apparatus as arranged there, then I might still have damped waves; but whether I use an alternator or some other way of getting energy to that condenser, the condenser is usually there.  For instance, if I use an alternator, I shunt its terminals with a condenser in order to magnify the current in the primary.  I then tune this circuit to the alternator, and magnify the current in the primary in the ratio of the inductance to the resistance.  Therefore, this condenser here stands for either method, and simply means that in this system, as is obvious from the description in the patent, the waves are undamped because high rises of potential would not be obtained otherwise.  Whenever I wanted to obtain a high potential, I had to observe these rules in order to force the potential up to that value."

Antennas and little magnetic radiation:

"This coil, which I have subsequently shown in my patents Nos. 645,576 and 649,621, in the form of a spiral, was, as you see, [earlier] in the form of a cone.  The idea was to put the coil, with reference to the primary, in an inductive connection which was not closeâ€"we call it now a loose couplingâ€"but free to permit a great resonant rise.  That was the first single step, as I say, toward the evolution of an invention which I have called my "magnifying transmitter." That means, a circuit connected to ground and to the antenna, of a tremendous electromagnetic momentum and small damping factor, with all the conditions so determined that an immense accumulation of electrical energy can take place.

It was along this line that I finally arrived at the results described in my article in the Century Magazine of June 1900.  [Fig. 43] shows an alternator; not the alternator that was furnished for my laboratory on Houston Streetâ€"that was another one, [but] at 35 South Fifth Avenue [and] operated on the same principle.  Here [lower left] are the condensers, primary, and all the rest.  The discharge there was 5 or 6 feet, comparatively small to what I subsequently obtained.  I have produced discharges of 100 feet, and could produce some of 1,000 feet if necessary, with the greatest facility.

Counsel

Mr. Tesla, at that point, what did you mean by electro-magnetic momentum?

Tesla

I mean that you have to have in the circuit, inertia. You have to have a large self-inductance in order that you may accomplish two things: First, a comparatively low frequency, which will reduce the radiation of the electromagnetic waves to a comparatively small value, and second, a great resonant effect.  That is not possible in an antenna, for instance, of large capacity and small self-inductance.  A large capacity and small self-inductance is the poorest kind of circuit which can be constructed; it gives a very small resonant effect.  That was the reason why in my experiments in Colorado the energies were 1,000 times greater than in the present antennae.

Counsel

You say the energy was 1,000 times greater.  Do you mean that the voltage was increased, or the current, or both?

Tesla

Yes [both].  To be more explicit, I take a very large self-inductance and a comparatively small capacity, which I have constructed in a certain way so that the electricity cannot leak out.  I thus obtain a low frequency; but, as you know, the electromagnetic radiation is proportionate to the square root of the capacity divided by the self-induction.  I do not permit the energy to go out; I accumulate in that circuit a tremendous energy.  When the high potential is attained, if I want to give off electromagnetic waves, I do so, but I prefer to reduce those waves in quantity and pass a current into the earth, because electromagnetic wave energy is not recoverable while that [earth] current is entirely recoverable, being the energy stored in an elastic system.

Counsel

What elastic system do you refer to?

Tesla

I mean this: If you pass a current into a circuit with large self-induction, and no radiation takes place, and you have a low resistance, there is no possibility of this energy getting out into space; therefore, the impressed impulses accumulate."

[T-1000]

Why don't we ignore the reality?


http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/Solenoid_magnetic_field.jpg


Why is it most only see the Magnetic spectrum and ignore the electric field? They both exist at the same time do they not? Kapanadze is using high voltage and that means the electric field is the strongest of the two fields.


No one wants to read and learn I guess. They have their minds set already as to the process and this is why they are failing! Yes diodes, spark gaps and capacitors can be used only in this process. It is that simple, plain and simple.

Back to basics:
http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Magnets/Leedskalnin/Magnetic-Current_Edward-Leedskalnin_51pp.pdf

No diodes or capacitors will change natural resonant frequency. The coils itself need to be adjusted for that. "Parasitic stray capacitance" in coil (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitic_capacitance) is your friend not enemy in that realm (remember http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifilar_coil ?).
Also if you miss natural resonant frequency and make just LC resonant frequency, you miss resonant magnetic interaction on nuclear level too. Please see what E. Leedskalnin was telling about small particles as very small magnets then hopefuly that will bring some understanding...

[Shokac]

Why don't we ignore the reality?


http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p171/jbignes5/Solenoid_magnetic_field.jpg


Why is it most only see the Magnetic spectrum and ignore the electric field? They both exist at the same time do they not? Kapanadze is using high voltage and that means the electric field is the strongest of the two fields.

Magnetic field make electric field. Two magnetic field make strong electric field bat only if the in phase and must be alternating or pulsating current.

Hi Voltage and spark make strong electromagnetic fields like lightning.

[jbignes5]

Magnetic field make electric field. Two magnetic field make strong electric field bat only if the in phase and must be alternating or pulsating current.

Hi Voltage and spark make strong electromagnetic fields like lightning.

Magnetic fields do not make electric fields. Electric fields are the support for magnetic fields. The one requirement for any transfer is the electric field. Since the electric field is not dependent on current it looses little in it's propagation. But on the other hand magnetic fields loose strength based on the inverse square law. This is because there is a lot of current in the magnetic field. Since there is a lot of current there is a lot of loss. The electric field has no current to loose and hence why it can go leaps and bounds further for less.


http://www.who.int/peh-emf/about/WhatisEMF/en/

This is just one explanation of the process. If there is no electric field there is no magnetic field. Although the difference is the electric field is based on volts per meter and the magnetic is amps per meter. But if you have no electric field then there is no associated magnetic field. The electric field could be either internal or external of an object. In the case of magnets it is internal and the magnetic lines are going through the internal electric field accelerating and then exiting the object and interacting with the external fields. This is done in the creation of the magnet or object. In the case of iron it is very possible that the material is highly electrical inside or at the very least highly organized particles that can be energized with the electric field. This causes the alignment and subsequent movement of the magnetic lines that are organized by the electric field internally and sort of tightened like a loose string of pearls. With the string being the magnetic portion and the pearls being sub sub sub particles that are highly charged and oriented by the internal electric static field. Magnetic's is a concentrated electric field or current(movement) of electric field.

  The picture below is a very very basic understanding of the fields and it doesn't show line density which is another variable. Electric lines are the only thing associated with this model. Because everything is based on 90 degrees. Meaning forces of the lines must obey 90 degrees to facilitate free movement of the lines otherwise the lines just get denser based on + (++) charge being stronger then - (+). The lower possible charge level is ambient of the surrounding environment. This would be considered negative -(+) when compared to the + (++). This is proven by the experiment of the Tesla switch.

The example is +12 and +24 volts with the negatives connected together. This results would allow you to run a motor that is based on 12 volts. The negative in this example would be the 12 volt and the positive would be the 24 volt side. The difference between the two is 12 volts and the motor runs as usual. The lines act the same based on the charge level of the nucleus in the picture. The closer to the nucleus the higher the density of the lines. This includes all the lines especially the "magnetic" lines. The density for the electric lines radiating out is actually the spacing between the bulges. I haven't figured out if the in and out are are real yet. I am leaning twords they are not and it is a single line but still have bulges because they are vibrating like a guitar string. They revolve but are the signal type like we see on an oscilloscope.

[T-1000]

Magnetic fields do not make electric fields. Electric fields are the support for magnetic fields.

It is opposite when you have oscillating magnetic fields. All electrical generators are based on this...