Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[ronotte]

Hi all,
I've just completed the autogenerator from WNG group. Here you can find my first tentative conclusions
The schematic in fig.1 is from to WNGs group. What is shown is basically a Kacher-Delamorto setup with quarter wave design (ANONIMUS - AIDAS 2012.02.21.jpg) and output load coupled with the use of concentric and separated coils and interwinding capacitor charging. This config is WRONG as plate coil connection must be reversed as correctly reported in earlier pic (fig. 2) or ТÐ'С-110ЛА autogenerator.png.

My final schematic is in fig.3. There it is possible to see that I changed the modulation approach adopting the standard ‘screen grid’ modulation . Also many Radio Frequency Choke (RFC) and adequate bypassing has been proved necessary. Voltage on top of big L30 is in excess of 4KV and practically not measurable with my HV probe (max 4KV). Positioning the probe’s tip at 1cm far from L30 open top gives already more than 2KV.

In Fig 4 you can see the waveform taken near the L30 top. The 2V vertical indication refers to HV probe so must be read 200V/div. It is only an indication as the probe put at 2cm from top. You can see that there is a near 100% modulation index at 20msec (50Hz) rate. The top and bottom side are flattened because too much modulation applied, nonetheless there is certainly max output condition.
The other almost sinusoidal wave is taken on screen grid and shows about 200V of positive 50Hz modulation. The two waveforms are in phase.

Output considerations. The lamp load (220V/60W) is connected on one side to transformer Tr1and on the other side to two concentric coils: L31 and L32. This means that without powering the kacher the lamp is slightly lighted as you can see in fig. 5. After kacher is switched on the lamp is more lighted as in fig. 6. That is the max difference I have been able to obtain.


The voltage taken differentially across the lamp is in fig 7. There you can see that  peak to peak voltage is 340V with some modulation superimposed of about 50 â€" 140V. In my opinion the lamp is not lighting as I would have expected for 340Vpp. (voltage while kacher off is much lower).

All comments are welcome!
Roberto

[cheappower2012]

Zeitmaschine said

Reading along this thread intensively since weeks,
I would suggest anyway to rerail this thread and return it to square one in order.
to figure out which important facts have since been overlooked (some with the kind
help of numerous distractors, I presume). I think the tin can video was recorded by chance,
hence there are no fakes in it only incidentally hidden parts.



A transistor using two connections will not work,a big rectifier that passes maybe
40 amps connected to the can object conducted by a very thin wires makes no sense.Blue tape wrapped around the coil to make it appear to be two coils or to focus your attention that it is the winding that makes it work is a good trick.Another one of TK's tricks is the earth ground connection its not needed,except to fake you out,reminds me of SM using magnets to fake out the investors.The video was recorded on purpose,check the picture,the suit is in the 2004 video and the same suit is the turkey video,the 2004 video was a demonstration of TK's device to someone connected to the Turks.So yes he hid things thats obvious to fool the suit.Further this member then is pushing Tesla,to either misdirect you or push hes pet theory.I'm not picking on this member only pointing out things,you have to be careful or like the tpu thread,4 years later you will have nothing.

[Zeitmaschine]

A transistor using two connections will not work

Yes, but these transistors obviously using three connections. Base and emitter are visible in 2004 video (tin can) and collector is visible in green box video (see pdf).

40 amps connected to the can object conducted by a very thin wires makes no sense.

But the high amps are coming from the ground cable, not the thin wires. Exactly that's the trick with the Kapanadze device, redirecting the amperage to the ground not to the power supply and transistors.

Blue tape wrapped around the coil to make it appear to be two coils or to focus your attention that it is the winding that makes it work is a good trick.

Maybe, but what's the point in not experimenting anyway with a two-parted coil?

Besides, why then is Kapanadze not using the same color for all wires of the coils in order to obfuscate the windings, but white and orange?

Unfortunately my VCO-IC's are all gone, so I can't do experiments right now.

Another one of TK's tricks is the earth ground connection its not needed

If earth connection is not needed, then why is the ammeter reading 22.9A in the green box video?

Regards

[jbignes5]

 I was thinking again about the source of energy here. I am going in the direction again of internal focusing. Oil filled cap with very heavy copper pipes. Or bery low gauge  solid copper wires. Plus the density of the lines will have been completely focused and reflected. The capacitor part is which way the electrodes turn. They should screw into each other and should be designed to facilitate equal breakdown tolerances.


These electric lines that radiate out are like a pixie stick. They cross the wire and use it like a fulcrum. they like other lines that are flowing in opposite direction the best. I'm also thinking the outside field will move the field inside, based on the pixie stick method. So designing a guide on the outside would facilitate better stable effects inside. Think rowing a boat on water. The capacitor inside would be energized with ease that way. I'm thinking this would work with a single heavy conductor wound in either direction. Coils tend to polarize the output and pre-define the gain available based on well know principles. Capacitors add huge amounts of punch.

The lines don't actually go through the material. This is because of the flow differential. More space outside of the wire makes it flow freer on the outside. Although the network is complete inside and transfers the finger position of one side directly to the other. I don't think the finger goes trough the matter. Just the information does and the finger flows around the matter and continues on. This does raise the excitation of the inner network and forces it to grow or pressurize. This can be used if the wire or coil inside is in the bifilar wound method to supply a constant current. It already has a voltage potential from the exciter field.

I used copper pipe in my example for the simple fact that we need to start thinking in terms of pumping and fluidic flows. We know these lines are what is responsible for energy generation. The flow once the connection has been established via voltage is entirely based on the action applied to the field.

If we took the transformer Tesla designed: Shown below. This design uses both currents at the same time. One a voltage current and the other a heavy magnetic current. The finger or lines come off of the 90 degree shifted thin wires. They also go inside as well. Iron changes a lot, it's a focus for heavy magnetic lines. This keeps the ring charged much like the Ed Leedskalnin PMH. <<Very important... The wires wound around the transformer go unimpeded both out(lossy) and in(amplifying). Remember these lines don't like to be compressed when they are of the same polarity. But none the less they squeeze together increasing their density and likewise their current. I am suspecting the lines follow the wire because it is congruent. The lines will follow around the wire cutting anything in the way. When the eggfs are cut they develop a charge from the line cutting the egg. This pushes against the next line and spins it in one direction.

This is a vital clue to the Tesla method. You also have to remember that one end of the coil will have a different value than on the other end. This increase will effect the shape of the field as I have shown. The only difference is that in the solenoid version compression is ommited. So take the vortex field and bend it over the arc of 1/4 of the ring. The field will become uniform across in the central portion. Adding to the force in the center is the two handed approach. Try to turn a valve with one hand gripping the handle like a car steering wheel and you get little torque. But use two hands diametrically opposed will net much better torque for less input.

The below picture shows that you can take an oscillation and turn it into inertia or stored energy. If you switched that off it would take a fair bit of time to run down I suspect. This also tells you there is a field present in the middle of the ring. It can't be magnetic because there is a magnetic ring provided to suck up the magnetic lines. This leaves only the electric field left.

I know this particular transformer had specially annealed Bessemer iron wire. There should be a short and unshort of this wire as well in my opinion this way you could PMH/unPMH this thing as well. This would make the device have a direct shut off for emergency use. Shorting is running mode and unshorting is not running mode. <Core modification.

[ronotte]

Hi jbignes5,

I'd like to give you some old Tesla open question hoping that you have a possible answer:

1 - The Oil cap. I do not understand why the oil would enhance the coil operation, could you explain? Mineral Oil (like one we use in cars) in my knowledge is intrinsically inert and good isolator, if circulated it could take out some heath. So, I should think that it make any difference: why the contrary? Is it only because it does increase the overall mass? Why?
2 - Referring to Tesla picture it is not clear if he intend use an iron toroidal core?
3 - In the past I did many attempts to replicate SM's TPU (6" and 15" diameter TPU , ECD, Spherics, etc) . Except Spherics blue print replication, all the other attempts mimic the Tesla's you posted: an horizontal inner air big-wire winding and 4 Control coils connected as per Tesla indication in order to build a rotating mag field. Difference is about iron core (not used in my exp.) and of course I never immersed all in oil. In my knowledge none near SM results. I personally obtained best case efficiency of 98%.
I encourage you to go deeper with your line of reasoning perhaps laying out a possible design according to Tesla patent.

I'll start soon experimentation with ambient RF collection to be used with capacitive coil exciting.

Thank you

Roberto