Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

@jbignes5
do you have some idea how to do some kind of experiment?

Well we already have evidence and experiments with the avramenko plug. The Kapanadze system would be the other. It uses a bidirectional pair to ground to separate the positive and negative static charges that are in the ground or earth. When you polarize the flows by running the bifilar coil in the middle of the hv coil one can see the separation via induction from the source well of Our planets static charge. We know there is a lot of rubbing going on inside of the core. This generates heat and a huge static potential to form. This potential of accumulated charges can be drawn from the source by exposing it to the hv electric field of the solenoid coil wrapped around the inner bifilar ground coils. Check my wiring diagram and see if it makes sense. This system would be the proof of that concept.

The one thing kapanadze didn't show was the voltage difference of thew two ground spots. I bet one was neutral and the other was highly charged via the bipolar grounding to each other. Once the system is on it works on it's own through the inertia of the charges between the two ground spots.

That means once the load gets too big it will suck down the difference and eventually stop self oscillating. So these systems will have a definite cap to the output of a given unit based on the construction and materials.


For those that did not see my diagram here it is again. The only thing I have left to figure out is if the solenoid coil is connected to ground 2 or 1 at the low end or the high end. Picture below:


I think I"m very close to figuring out why the magnetic spark gap is soo good. It increases the resistance to back flow current after the breakdown of the air across the gap. It does not allow current to return at all. This might be why it was so useful as a variable diode in the discharge circuits. Everything can be adjusted then to the return pulse, magnetic polarization of the air allows the space to become resistant to alignment and feedback. It's the perfect one way valve. This can create a constant pressure or vacuum if one wanted. Wow Tesla was really smart in that area. His favorite thing to do was make his own vacuum tubes.

We also have to remember if we want pressure we must shield or reflect it back into itself and not let it leak out where it would depressurize the system.

Hmm the picture seems to be a ground loop feedback circuit. the second picture eerily looks like the polarized version or Avramenko plug

[jbignes5]

 Now from seeing the ground loop system in a circuit makes sense really to what Tesla did. He knew antennas we virtual grounds or acted like grounds. The main antenna or source ground is in the back of lets say a Pierce arrow. With two smaller surface antennas on the box. Two magnitzed steel rods being the other grounds. The taller antenna has much more surface area then the smaller ones and hence sreads out the value it's charged to in even spacial excitation. These separate and get attracted to the appropriate polarity of magnet sticking out of the box. Put an exciter coil around the main line to source ground and you can pulse the whole system now. Every pulse causes an intensifying of the fields and they grow until they touch the magnets. A polarized flow should happen and each side will be caused to have a difference of voltage.


The antenna theory and intensifying effects of going from larger to smaller surface area is very intrinsic to our understandings already through RF technology. But this won't be RF per say. It is like RF but works out of phase of the regular theory. We are trying to ignor the magnetic and only use the band of current that responds to higher voltages. This is because the loss goes way down when you can restrict the resistance of the driving system.


Using the Tesla radiant receiver coils as a very low loss capacitor seems to be the best choice because we can stack them and every time we do they lower the esr of the unit. Of course oil will have to be used with these coil/caps because this will extend their capabilities much further along the scale of voltage spikes we will be using.

The radiant receiver coils in my opinion are accelerators of charges. We can simulate these charges by using a spark gap. Once it is fired the lower the resistance ofr the path the higher the effects you get because the charge is not slowed down but sped up. This is why Tesla used the bifilar coil as another receiver of the pulse. Then all he had to do was shot it once and two different polarities came out of the end of the secondary coils. One for each polarity. This was the special coil I have shown many many times and is well documented in his lectures as well.

http://www.jensen-transformers.com/an/generic%20seminar.pdf A good pdf of ground loops and reducing the noise ground loops cause. This might be helpful to understand what they do and how to allow this to happen in our systems.

From another source comes this:

"Even a very small induced voltage can cause a very large current in a ground conductor loop, because the resistance (and inductance) are very low. These currents can indeed be tens of amps. Current induction can be caused for example by cables carrying high currents and from transformers."

"The amount of current that can be induced into the loop for a given magnetic field is related to the area of the loop. Keeping the two interconnects distant from each other creates a large loop area resulting in larger currents. Keeping them close together reduces the loop area and the subsequent currents, however this situation has implications for increased crosstalk.

The sources of alternating magnetic fields which can induce currents into the loop can be anything from loudspeaker cables and AC power cords, to television sets and computer monitors, to fluorescent light ballasts and electric motors, and, unavoidably, the AC power lines in our homes."

Am I reading this stuff right?

"What is a Ground Loop?
A Ground Loop (not a particularly intuitive term) arises in a system when points nominated as Grounds are at different potentials (for various reasons) AND there is more than one electrical path connecting these Grounds AND signal lines are connected in such a way that circulating ground currents are able to flow through one or more signal conductors.
The resulting current that flows in the loop can be very large - in extreme cases hundreds of amps - but is more commonly less than 500 mA. The voltage drop along the wire that is part of the measurement circuit is impressed on the signal voltage thus causing the error. Because this current is variable, it cannot be "calibrated out""

Hundreds of amps?


"If back EMF simply appeared as high frequency, short duration voltage spikes, it would be
relatively easy to filter using small, high frequency capacitors (such as polyester film
capacitors). However, since the back EMF voltage is acting through the relatively low
resistance motor winding (0.1 to 10 ohms are typical), the back EMF voltage spikes also
produce a significant "***current spike*** with enough energy that a large capacitive filter ***or Capcoil(bifilar coil in oil design)*** is
necessary."

My own focus comments with *** around it.

[wattsup]

@all

Regarding the Tesla Transmission of Energy (TTE) as @ronotte has shown, you have a TTE transmitter (TTET) and one or more TTE receiver(s) (TTER) right.

OK, so what if the TTER was not used to run a load, but instead used to run an OU device as the main feed having both input energy and "inherent" frequency all in one. Like a long distance optocoupler.

Even further, what if SM (not related to TK) ran his devices in this manner with a central TTET that was just strong enough to start and run the impulse and also provide the pulse frequency to his OU devices. The OU device would produce the final output. Anyone trying to measure any energy transmission going on around the device would not catch anything strong enough to warrant the output of the device so they say there was no transmission of this energy to the device, but maybe it was just a small transmission just to keep it running without worrying about blowing any mosfets. He even indicated that the circumference of the unit determined the frequency.

Imagine with one TTET, how may pulse circuits would that replace on the TTER. One TTET could run how many Joule Thiefs while the JT would not require transistors or diodes until the energy exits to a dioded load cap.

wattsup

[jbignes5]

In accordance with the revered teachings of  Georg Simon Ohm, these voltages while quite low are capable of generating significant current flow.  It is then these “looping” currents that create the unwanted noise by impressing their signature on low level signals, usually in the form of common mode noise.


This is mind blowing. Is this what Maxwell knew and was removed from the equations?

Does this mean making a core out of copper like a toroid is the best core?

[verpies]

Anyone trying to measure any energy transmission going on around the device would not catch anything strong enough to warrant the output of the device so they say there was no transmission of this energy to the device, but maybe it was just a small transmission just to keep it running without worrying about blowing any mosfets. He even indicated that the circumference of the unit determined the frequency.

I was hired once to investigate a TPU type setup designed to milk investors.
I caught the deception with simple 3D search coils and a portable scopemeter - there was a large winding under the floorboards and the DUT was the secondary of an air-core transformer