Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Cap-Z-ro]

Personally, if someone has something to say or post, I have the time to listen or read what is offered.

Lest something of importance be missed or passed over.

Regards...

[stivep]

A cheap CB Linear Amplifier can also be a powerful source of fast pulses.  It's good up to 27MHz.

No it is good for nothing.
CB or Ham Radio amplifier is tuned based on  swithible   "pi" filters.
Each of them  has a certain bandwidth.
At this bandwidth you have always only one frequency of maximum pick.
classes
A,
B,
AB,
C,
Modulations SSB or AM or listed below.



Ham Radio
SSB=2.4KHz
AM=6KHz
A1 (CW) 400 to 600 Hz
A2 modulated carrier 1.2 to 2KHz
The more narrow is the signal the more narrow is  tuning of  amplifier.


For comparison spectral components of plasma  of 250kHz generator is  roughly 10Hz to 1.5 GHz.
Pick of 240 KHz plasma  has bandwidth  of  50khz but mostly specified by parameters of spark ( material, medium, distance, voltage)
Pick of 1MHz plasma has  bandwidth  in pick  specified only by parameters of  spark.
We can vary pick of bandwidth of plasma   but we will have big problem to stabilize it and impedance matching as well.

27 MHZ is simply waste of money and time.
Typical characteristic  at band pass filter for say wide  band 3.5- 4MHz ( 80 meters)
is frequency of tunable pi filter ( capacitor, coil, capacitor.)
equals up to 40% of losses at the edges of it if you do not re tune the pick frequency to  particular frequency of transmitter within that bandwidth. But that also depends from characteristic of resonance circuit that is represented by our antenna.( such as dipole, inverted V, Yagi, .........loop- hmmm. loop is good  high voltage ........and so on)
Modern method is just use   band pass filters switchable  by relay say 3 of them but than we are dealing with significant power say 100W for filters to withhold.


But only if load is steady in parameters. Period.


Also frequency of response does not only depend  from pi filter but from impedance of the load.


when we deal with spark than load is and must be  understand as capacitive load ( high voltage, low current)
Nature of the spark  is unstable and impedance is uncertain, frequency response is unstable and wide.
The good is that it is us who pushes spark to respond at certain frequency
In practice  we need to automatically adjust gap to keep it steady or manufacture spark gap for the specific frequency of response ( bandwidth) That is only possible for ready to use out of shelf device that we do not have it  yet.
Pre tuning could be done  by decreasing gap distance.
But when we have plasma flow than we have to adjust again to match  to temporary stage of plasma and pi filter and reverse.


Automatic tuning could be done using triodes when one of them is used as generator with coupled coil in the cathode that is influenced by another coil at output circuit.
Schematic is available  from Aidas but I have to ask him for authorization before I will publish it.
Or just ask Arunas T-1000   to contact Aidas.


summary :
proposed amplifier will not  work  and will never work,
Not even for a second as impedance of output is 50 Ohm directed to inductive character load.
VSWR due to mismatch in capacitive load must than affect output of the amplifier  transistor and that one must be prepared to handle high voltages of capacitive load.



all you going to have is only  broken parts .


supporting material:
http://www.advanced-energy.com/upload/file/white_papers/eng-white18-270-02.pdf
http://www.icpig.uni-greifswald.de/proceedings/data/Dine_1
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA426684
Design, fabrication, and impedance of plasma wave detectors
http://nano.ece.uci.edu/papers/PSI59950M.pdf


Wesley

[jbignes5]

 Ok so I was thinking again about motors and I think the Tesla motor generator operates on the same premise of the lines. If lines are forming 90 degrees out of the wires then they would also be 3d as well. The fingers or lines generally form around wires in 2,4,6,8 and soo on. Always in pairs depending on the voltage value at that spot on the wire. These fingers get stiffer the higher the voltage goes and with the compressing nature of a circle from going into the center they compress and intensify cutting through the heavy rotor coils. Since the magnetic field is locked in the toroid core there is only the electric field left. Any bemf would be so weak that it wouldn't matter anymore and the motor runs way more efficiently. The heavy magnetic field will lock to the core around it and the heavy current field would induce a very high voltage field in the surrounding coil. This thing would be transforming in waves inside.

[Zeitmaschine]

why is he spamming our board?

Last attempt to cover over the truth of Kapanadze device?

Anyway, interesting stuff so far. Here a few more things to consider:

1) All hidden electronic equipment should fit in a round tin can with approx. 13cm diameter and 10cm height
2) The precision of the circuitry should match the (non-existent) precision of the 2004 coil
3) No high-tech parts, the circuit arrangement is most likely build out of junk parts from age old consumer electronics
4) There are no magnets at or near the spark gaps visible in Kapanadze videos
5) Neither the spark gap nor the helical coil have parallel-connected capacitors
6) There is nothing visible to electronically fine-adjust anything

My next realizations I have come to:

Changing the spark frequency slightly changes the amplitude of the resonating wave, but not dramatically. My clearest resonance is currently around 170KHz.

When I connect my oscilloscope to the bifilar secondary coil, then I get the waveform as shown in the previous image. But this is only true when the ground of the test probe is connected to the opposite side of the exciter coil (left side in Kapanadze 2004 setup), when I reverse the connection the amplitude of the resonating wave goes to minimum.

When the amplitude of the wave is high, touching the exciter coil reduces the amplitude. When the amplitude of the wave is low (+ and - reversed), touching the exciter coil increases the amplitude (but not to unreversed level).

My oscilloscope has no earth connection (have cut it on the power cable), hence what causes the different measurements? The metallic mass (shielding, housing) of the oscilloscope perhaps? Could this be the searched Kapanadze effect? If so, how to get power out of this effect?

Regards

[TinselKoala]

@Zeitmaschine: I made a long post, then I saw that you are using the bifilar correctly, as Telsa had it, not as a hairpin, so my post was irrelevant.
Your amplitude is varying because of the changing capacitance with respect to ground, caused by the mass of metal in the oscilloscope or by your body.

Please don't touch a properly working secondary, it will hurt !!

I've never had much success using bifilars as secondaries. But as primaries the benefit is obvious, compared to a normal pancake coil.